Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161 |
Resumo: | The (in)equality issues facing disabled people are extensive and long-enduring. The way(s) in which equality is conceptualised has important consequences for understandings of disability. The ambiguity of what I call dis-equality theory is two-fold; the apparent failure of mainstream equality theorising in, firstly, embracing disability concepts at all, and secondly, in fully incorporating the logistics of disability, particularly in relation to the social construction of such. Practices of institutional and more complex forms of discrimination are part of those deeper structures of domination and oppression which maintain disabled people in positions of disadvantage. Everyday practices, in the ‘ordinary order of things’ (Bourdieu, 2000), continue to be misrecognised as natural and taken for granted. This article critically explores the complexity of dis-equality theorising utilising a Bourdieusian lens which explicitly incorporates complex and subtle forms of discrimination, and by examining the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ approach to equality. I argue that the way forward for dis-equality theorising in today’s rights based era must be one that considers the nuances of the ‘rules of the game’ (Young, 1990) if it is to be effective in challenging the inequalities to which disabled people have long been subject. |
id |
RCAP_8c1d6cdd4fc3145dbbc521daeae30159 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and EqualityBourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPDThe (in)equality issues facing disabled people are extensive and long-enduring. The way(s) in which equality is conceptualised has important consequences for understandings of disability. The ambiguity of what I call dis-equality theory is two-fold; the apparent failure of mainstream equality theorising in, firstly, embracing disability concepts at all, and secondly, in fully incorporating the logistics of disability, particularly in relation to the social construction of such. Practices of institutional and more complex forms of discrimination are part of those deeper structures of domination and oppression which maintain disabled people in positions of disadvantage. Everyday practices, in the ‘ordinary order of things’ (Bourdieu, 2000), continue to be misrecognised as natural and taken for granted. This article critically explores the complexity of dis-equality theorising utilising a Bourdieusian lens which explicitly incorporates complex and subtle forms of discrimination, and by examining the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ approach to equality. I argue that the way forward for dis-equality theorising in today’s rights based era must be one that considers the nuances of the ‘rules of the game’ (Young, 1990) if it is to be effective in challenging the inequalities to which disabled people have long been subject.Cogitatio2018-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 9-172183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161/1161Copyright (c) 2018 Bronagh Byrnehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessByrne, Bronagh2022-12-20T11:00:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:57.255457Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
title |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
spellingShingle |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality Byrne, Bronagh Bourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPD |
title_short |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
title_full |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
title_fullStr |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
title_sort |
Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality |
author |
Byrne, Bronagh |
author_facet |
Byrne, Bronagh |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Byrne, Bronagh |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPD |
topic |
Bourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPD |
description |
The (in)equality issues facing disabled people are extensive and long-enduring. The way(s) in which equality is conceptualised has important consequences for understandings of disability. The ambiguity of what I call dis-equality theory is two-fold; the apparent failure of mainstream equality theorising in, firstly, embracing disability concepts at all, and secondly, in fully incorporating the logistics of disability, particularly in relation to the social construction of such. Practices of institutional and more complex forms of discrimination are part of those deeper structures of domination and oppression which maintain disabled people in positions of disadvantage. Everyday practices, in the ‘ordinary order of things’ (Bourdieu, 2000), continue to be misrecognised as natural and taken for granted. This article critically explores the complexity of dis-equality theorising utilising a Bourdieusian lens which explicitly incorporates complex and subtle forms of discrimination, and by examining the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ approach to equality. I argue that the way forward for dis-equality theorising in today’s rights based era must be one that considers the nuances of the ‘rules of the game’ (Young, 1990) if it is to be effective in challenging the inequalities to which disabled people have long been subject. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-26 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161/1161 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Bronagh Byrne http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Bronagh Byrne http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 9-17 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130665836347392 |