Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Byrne, Bronagh
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161
Resumo: The (in)equality issues facing disabled people are extensive and long-enduring. The way(s) in which equality is conceptualised has important consequences for understandings of disability. The ambiguity of what I call dis-equality theory is two-fold; the apparent failure of mainstream equality theorising in, firstly, embracing disability concepts at all, and secondly, in fully incorporating the logistics of disability, particularly in relation to the social construction of such. Practices of institutional and more complex forms of discrimination are part of those deeper structures of domination and oppression which maintain disabled people in positions of disadvantage. Everyday practices, in the ‘ordinary order of things’ (Bourdieu, 2000), continue to be misrecognised as natural and taken for granted. This article critically explores the complexity of dis-equality theorising utilising a Bourdieusian lens which explicitly incorporates complex and subtle forms of discrimination, and by examining the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ approach to equality. I argue that the way forward for dis-equality theorising in today’s rights based era must be one that considers the nuances of the ‘rules of the game’ (Young, 1990) if it is to be effective in challenging the inequalities to which disabled people have long been subject.
id RCAP_8c1d6cdd4fc3145dbbc521daeae30159
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and EqualityBourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPDThe (in)equality issues facing disabled people are extensive and long-enduring. The way(s) in which equality is conceptualised has important consequences for understandings of disability. The ambiguity of what I call dis-equality theory is two-fold; the apparent failure of mainstream equality theorising in, firstly, embracing disability concepts at all, and secondly, in fully incorporating the logistics of disability, particularly in relation to the social construction of such. Practices of institutional and more complex forms of discrimination are part of those deeper structures of domination and oppression which maintain disabled people in positions of disadvantage. Everyday practices, in the ‘ordinary order of things’ (Bourdieu, 2000), continue to be misrecognised as natural and taken for granted. This article critically explores the complexity of dis-equality theorising utilising a Bourdieusian lens which explicitly incorporates complex and subtle forms of discrimination, and by examining the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ approach to equality. I argue that the way forward for dis-equality theorising in today’s rights based era must be one that considers the nuances of the ‘rules of the game’ (Young, 1990) if it is to be effective in challenging the inequalities to which disabled people have long been subject.Cogitatio2018-03-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 9-172183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161/1161Copyright (c) 2018 Bronagh Byrnehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessByrne, Bronagh2022-12-20T11:00:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:57.255457Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
title Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
spellingShingle Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
Byrne, Bronagh
Bourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPD
title_short Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
title_full Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
title_fullStr Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
title_full_unstemmed Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
title_sort Dis-Equality: Exploring the Juxtaposition of Disability and Equality
author Byrne, Bronagh
author_facet Byrne, Bronagh
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Byrne, Bronagh
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPD
topic Bourdieu; disability; dis-equality; discrimination; equality; rights; UNCRPD
description The (in)equality issues facing disabled people are extensive and long-enduring. The way(s) in which equality is conceptualised has important consequences for understandings of disability. The ambiguity of what I call dis-equality theory is two-fold; the apparent failure of mainstream equality theorising in, firstly, embracing disability concepts at all, and secondly, in fully incorporating the logistics of disability, particularly in relation to the social construction of such. Practices of institutional and more complex forms of discrimination are part of those deeper structures of domination and oppression which maintain disabled people in positions of disadvantage. Everyday practices, in the ‘ordinary order of things’ (Bourdieu, 2000), continue to be misrecognised as natural and taken for granted. This article critically explores the complexity of dis-equality theorising utilising a Bourdieusian lens which explicitly incorporates complex and subtle forms of discrimination, and by examining the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ approach to equality. I argue that the way forward for dis-equality theorising in today’s rights based era must be one that considers the nuances of the ‘rules of the game’ (Young, 1990) if it is to be effective in challenging the inequalities to which disabled people have long been subject.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1161
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1161
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1161/1161
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Bronagh Byrne
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Bronagh Byrne
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Disability Equality: In Theory and Practice; 9-17
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130665836347392