Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The non-muscle invasive bladder tumors should be stratified into risk groups so the adjuvant treatment after surgery can be suited to each patient. The high risk tumors should be treated with one to three-year maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). It has been reported shortages of intravesical BCG and our hospital center was affected in 2014/2015, leading to a treatment change of the patients who had indication to BCG. Gemcitabine could be a valid alternative because some studies show it may have a role in intermediate-risk patients, as an alternative to mitomycin C, and in high risk, BCG-refractory patients, with a better toxicity profile. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study that included patients with non-muscle invasive bladder tumors of high risk with onset of disease in 2013/2014, affected by the BCG shortage period at the Hospital Center. Results: At CHLC, 11 high-risk patients were treated with gemcitabine, only two exclusively, and the others sequentially with BCG. Only two patients, treated with both gemcitabine and BCG, had tumoral recurrence. However, a significant number (6 out of 11) had adverse events, two of whom had to stop treatment. Conclusion: Apparently, gemcitabine seems to be a good adjuvant treatment choice during the shortage of the gold standard treatment, due to the low number of recurrence, although adverse events reported were high. |
id |
RCAP_0e7c06dd8ab39d71ffd8ad14ff645648 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) ExperienceA Gencitabina como Alternativa Terapêutica na Ausência de BCG: A Experiência do CHLC (Hospital S. José)BCG VaccineGemcitabine/therapeutic useMitomycin/ therapeutic useTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapyGemcitabina/uso terapêuticoMitomicina/uso terapêuticoNeoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamentoResultado do TratamentoVacina BCGIntroduction: The non-muscle invasive bladder tumors should be stratified into risk groups so the adjuvant treatment after surgery can be suited to each patient. The high risk tumors should be treated with one to three-year maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). It has been reported shortages of intravesical BCG and our hospital center was affected in 2014/2015, leading to a treatment change of the patients who had indication to BCG. Gemcitabine could be a valid alternative because some studies show it may have a role in intermediate-risk patients, as an alternative to mitomycin C, and in high risk, BCG-refractory patients, with a better toxicity profile. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study that included patients with non-muscle invasive bladder tumors of high risk with onset of disease in 2013/2014, affected by the BCG shortage period at the Hospital Center. Results: At CHLC, 11 high-risk patients were treated with gemcitabine, only two exclusively, and the others sequentially with BCG. Only two patients, treated with both gemcitabine and BCG, had tumoral recurrence. However, a significant number (6 out of 11) had adverse events, two of whom had to stop treatment. Conclusion: Apparently, gemcitabine seems to be a good adjuvant treatment choice during the shortage of the gold standard treatment, due to the low number of recurrence, although adverse events reported were high.Introdução: Os tumores não músculo invasivos da bexiga devem ser estratificados em grupos de risco de forma a adequar o tratamento após cirurgia a cada doente. Nos tumores de alto risco deve ser realizada terapêutica adjuvante com bacilo de Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical durante 1 a 3 anos. Têm sido reportadas roturas de stock de BCG intravesical, tendo sido o Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central (CHLC) afectado nos anos 2014 e 2015, o que obrigou a uma reformulação no tratamento dos doentes que tinham indicação para realização desta terapêutica. A gencitabina poderá ser uma alternativa válida, dado que alguns estudos mostram que poderá ter um papel nos doentes de risco intermédio, como alternativa à mitomicina C, e nos de alto risco, refractários à BCG, com um perfil de toxicidade mais favorável. Material e Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo retrospectivo descritivo que incluiu doentes com tumores da bexiga não musculo-invasivos de alto risco, com início da doença em 2013/2014, afectados pelo período de escassez de BCG no Centro Hospitalar. Resultados: No CHLC, 11 doentes com tumores de alto risco foram submetidos a terapêutica com gencitabina, apenas dois exclusivamente, os restantes sequencialmente com BCG. Apenas dois doentes, tratados com BCG e gencitabina, apresentaram recidiva tumoral. No entanto, um número significativo (6 em 11) sofreram efeitos adversos, dois dos quais que levaram à interrupção da terapêutica. Conclusão: Aparentemente, a gencitabina foi uma boa alternativa de terapêutica adjuvante na ausência do tratamento gold standard (BCG), dada a existência de baixo número de recidivais tumorais, apesar do elevado número de efeitos adversos reportados.Associação Portuguesa de Urologia2019-09-21T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1-2 (2019): January - June; 11-16Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 36 n. 1-2 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 11-162387-04192341-4022reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttp://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90/49Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, VanessaMedeiros, MarianaGuimarães, TiagoBernardino, RuiFalcão, GilFernandes, FranciscoFarinha, RuiCalais da Silva, FernandoCampos Pinheiro, Luís2022-09-21T09:04:47Zoai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:54.314871Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience A Gencitabina como Alternativa Terapêutica na Ausência de BCG: A Experiência do CHLC (Hospital S. José) |
title |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience |
spellingShingle |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience Andrade, Vanessa BCG Vaccine Gemcitabine/therapeutic use Mitomycin/ therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy Gemcitabina/uso terapêutico Mitomicina/uso terapêutico Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento Resultado do Tratamento Vacina BCG |
title_short |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience |
title_full |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience |
title_fullStr |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience |
title_sort |
Gemcitabine as a Therapeutic Alternative during Shortage of BCG: The CHLC (Hospital S. José) Experience |
author |
Andrade, Vanessa |
author_facet |
Andrade, Vanessa Medeiros, Mariana Guimarães, Tiago Bernardino, Rui Falcão, Gil Fernandes, Francisco Farinha, Rui Calais da Silva, Fernando Campos Pinheiro, Luís |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medeiros, Mariana Guimarães, Tiago Bernardino, Rui Falcão, Gil Fernandes, Francisco Farinha, Rui Calais da Silva, Fernando Campos Pinheiro, Luís |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrade, Vanessa Medeiros, Mariana Guimarães, Tiago Bernardino, Rui Falcão, Gil Fernandes, Francisco Farinha, Rui Calais da Silva, Fernando Campos Pinheiro, Luís |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
BCG Vaccine Gemcitabine/therapeutic use Mitomycin/ therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy Gemcitabina/uso terapêutico Mitomicina/uso terapêutico Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento Resultado do Tratamento Vacina BCG |
topic |
BCG Vaccine Gemcitabine/therapeutic use Mitomycin/ therapeutic use Treatment Outcome Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy Gemcitabina/uso terapêutico Mitomicina/uso terapêutico Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento Resultado do Tratamento Vacina BCG |
description |
Introduction: The non-muscle invasive bladder tumors should be stratified into risk groups so the adjuvant treatment after surgery can be suited to each patient. The high risk tumors should be treated with one to three-year maintenance intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). It has been reported shortages of intravesical BCG and our hospital center was affected in 2014/2015, leading to a treatment change of the patients who had indication to BCG. Gemcitabine could be a valid alternative because some studies show it may have a role in intermediate-risk patients, as an alternative to mitomycin C, and in high risk, BCG-refractory patients, with a better toxicity profile. Material and Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study that included patients with non-muscle invasive bladder tumors of high risk with onset of disease in 2013/2014, affected by the BCG shortage period at the Hospital Center. Results: At CHLC, 11 high-risk patients were treated with gemcitabine, only two exclusively, and the others sequentially with BCG. Only two patients, treated with both gemcitabine and BCG, had tumoral recurrence. However, a significant number (6 out of 11) had adverse events, two of whom had to stop treatment. Conclusion: Apparently, gemcitabine seems to be a good adjuvant treatment choice during the shortage of the gold standard treatment, due to the low number of recurrence, although adverse events reported were high. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-21T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90 oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:oai.actaurologicaportuguesa.com:article/90 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90 https://doi.org/10.24915/aup.36.1-2.90 http://www.actaurologicaportuguesa.com/index.php/aup/article/view/90/49 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urology info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Portuguese Association of Urology |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Urologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Urológica Portuguesa; Vol. 36 No. 1-2 (2019): January - June; 11-16 Acta Urológica Portuguesa; v. 36 n. 1-2 (2019): Janeiro - Junho; 11-16 2387-0419 2341-4022 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817551684451172352 |