Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085 |
Resumo: | The current convergence of global challenges, particularly the climate change emergency, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter movement, have highlighted the need for a new lens to challenge and interrogate key urban planning assumptions related to spatial urban inequality. Yet urban inequality is often and invariably described from a limited economic perspective, commonly interpreted and measured as income inequality. This is an overtly statistical measure, or Gini-Type index, often giving limited and unsatisfactory results. Yet, in practice, the spatial distribution and concentration of income inequality is a multi-scalar, multi-variant, and multi-disciplinary issue and has links with other and wider dimensions of inequality and well-being. As such, this article argues for a holistic understanding of urban inequality that goes beyond narrow empirical and quantitative models. It presents collaborative research that aims to impact the actions of urban professionals, to accurately identify and adequately respond to urban inequalities. Through the establishment of an interdisciplinary expert panel, we have uncovered a series of provisional mechanisms and responses to aid practitioners to achieve more spatial equality. We introduce an integrated analytical method, the “litmus test,” that acts as a planning tool for understanding, evaluating, and responding to inequalities and segregation present in the built environment. This novel methodology and procedural framework will assist us in (a) identifying and defining different forms of inequality and segregation beyond the current scope of physical and agency-based forms; (b) measuring and demonstrating the latter with a combination of qualitative, empirical sources that are materially significant in supporting and evidencing planning strategies; and (c) setting out a series of planning and built environment specific responses. |
id |
RCAP_113790c42049dc8e9f928f054fdb55c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6085 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environmentinequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planningThe current convergence of global challenges, particularly the climate change emergency, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter movement, have highlighted the need for a new lens to challenge and interrogate key urban planning assumptions related to spatial urban inequality. Yet urban inequality is often and invariably described from a limited economic perspective, commonly interpreted and measured as income inequality. This is an overtly statistical measure, or Gini-Type index, often giving limited and unsatisfactory results. Yet, in practice, the spatial distribution and concentration of income inequality is a multi-scalar, multi-variant, and multi-disciplinary issue and has links with other and wider dimensions of inequality and well-being. As such, this article argues for a holistic understanding of urban inequality that goes beyond narrow empirical and quantitative models. It presents collaborative research that aims to impact the actions of urban professionals, to accurately identify and adequately respond to urban inequalities. Through the establishment of an interdisciplinary expert panel, we have uncovered a series of provisional mechanisms and responses to aid practitioners to achieve more spatial equality. We introduce an integrated analytical method, the “litmus test,” that acts as a planning tool for understanding, evaluating, and responding to inequalities and segregation present in the built environment. This novel methodology and procedural framework will assist us in (a) identifying and defining different forms of inequality and segregation beyond the current scope of physical and agency-based forms; (b) measuring and demonstrating the latter with a combination of qualitative, empirical sources that are materially significant in supporting and evidencing planning strategies; and (c) setting out a series of planning and built environment specific responses.Cogitatio Press2023-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085Urban Planning; Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Social Justice in the Green City; 372-3872183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085/6085Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Crilly, Georgiana Varna, Chandra Mouli Vemury, Mark Lemon, Andrew Mitchellinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrilly, MichaelVarna, GeorgianaMouli Vemury, ChandraLemon, MarkMitchell, Andrew2023-06-29T21:15:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6085Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:42:41.142451Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
title |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
spellingShingle |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment Crilly, Michael inequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planning |
title_short |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
title_full |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
title_fullStr |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
title_sort |
Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment |
author |
Crilly, Michael |
author_facet |
Crilly, Michael Varna, Georgiana Mouli Vemury, Chandra Lemon, Mark Mitchell, Andrew |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Varna, Georgiana Mouli Vemury, Chandra Lemon, Mark Mitchell, Andrew |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Crilly, Michael Varna, Georgiana Mouli Vemury, Chandra Lemon, Mark Mitchell, Andrew |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
inequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planning |
topic |
inequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planning |
description |
The current convergence of global challenges, particularly the climate change emergency, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter movement, have highlighted the need for a new lens to challenge and interrogate key urban planning assumptions related to spatial urban inequality. Yet urban inequality is often and invariably described from a limited economic perspective, commonly interpreted and measured as income inequality. This is an overtly statistical measure, or Gini-Type index, often giving limited and unsatisfactory results. Yet, in practice, the spatial distribution and concentration of income inequality is a multi-scalar, multi-variant, and multi-disciplinary issue and has links with other and wider dimensions of inequality and well-being. As such, this article argues for a holistic understanding of urban inequality that goes beyond narrow empirical and quantitative models. It presents collaborative research that aims to impact the actions of urban professionals, to accurately identify and adequately respond to urban inequalities. Through the establishment of an interdisciplinary expert panel, we have uncovered a series of provisional mechanisms and responses to aid practitioners to achieve more spatial equality. We introduce an integrated analytical method, the “litmus test,” that acts as a planning tool for understanding, evaluating, and responding to inequalities and segregation present in the built environment. This novel methodology and procedural framework will assist us in (a) identifying and defining different forms of inequality and segregation beyond the current scope of physical and agency-based forms; (b) measuring and demonstrating the latter with a combination of qualitative, empirical sources that are materially significant in supporting and evidencing planning strategies; and (c) setting out a series of planning and built environment specific responses. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-03-16 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085/6085 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Urban Planning; Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Social Justice in the Green City; 372-387 2183-7635 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131513042763776 |