Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crilly, Michael
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Varna, Georgiana, Mouli Vemury, Chandra, Lemon, Mark, Mitchell, Andrew
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085
Resumo: The current convergence of global challenges, particularly the climate change emergency, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter movement, have highlighted the need for a new lens to challenge and interrogate key urban planning assumptions related to spatial urban inequality. Yet urban inequality is often and invariably described from a limited economic perspective, commonly interpreted and measured as income inequality. This is an overtly statistical measure, or Gini-Type index, often giving limited and unsatisfactory results. Yet, in practice, the spatial distribution and concentration of income inequality is a multi-scalar, multi-variant, and multi-disciplinary issue and has links with other and wider dimensions of inequality and well-being. As such, this article argues for a holistic understanding of urban inequality that goes beyond narrow empirical and quantitative models. It presents collaborative research that aims to impact the actions of urban professionals, to accurately identify and adequately respond to urban inequalities. Through the establishment of an interdisciplinary expert panel, we have uncovered a series of provisional mechanisms and responses to aid practitioners to achieve more spatial equality. We introduce an integrated analytical method, the “litmus test,” that acts as a planning tool for understanding, evaluating, and responding to inequalities and segregation present in the built environment. This novel methodology and procedural framework will assist us in (a) identifying and defining different forms of inequality and segregation beyond the current scope of physical and agency-based forms; (b) measuring and demonstrating the latter with a combination of qualitative, empirical sources that are materially significant in supporting and evidencing planning strategies; and (c) setting out a series of planning and built environment specific responses.
id RCAP_113790c42049dc8e9f928f054fdb55c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6085
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environmentinequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planningThe current convergence of global challenges, particularly the climate change emergency, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter movement, have highlighted the need for a new lens to challenge and interrogate key urban planning assumptions related to spatial urban inequality. Yet urban inequality is often and invariably described from a limited economic perspective, commonly interpreted and measured as income inequality. This is an overtly statistical measure, or Gini-Type index, often giving limited and unsatisfactory results. Yet, in practice, the spatial distribution and concentration of income inequality is a multi-scalar, multi-variant, and multi-disciplinary issue and has links with other and wider dimensions of inequality and well-being. As such, this article argues for a holistic understanding of urban inequality that goes beyond narrow empirical and quantitative models. It presents collaborative research that aims to impact the actions of urban professionals, to accurately identify and adequately respond to urban inequalities. Through the establishment of an interdisciplinary expert panel, we have uncovered a series of provisional mechanisms and responses to aid practitioners to achieve more spatial equality. We introduce an integrated analytical method, the “litmus test,” that acts as a planning tool for understanding, evaluating, and responding to inequalities and segregation present in the built environment. This novel methodology and procedural framework will assist us in (a) identifying and defining different forms of inequality and segregation beyond the current scope of physical and agency-based forms; (b) measuring and demonstrating the latter with a combination of qualitative, empirical sources that are materially significant in supporting and evidencing planning strategies; and (c) setting out a series of planning and built environment specific responses.Cogitatio Press2023-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085Urban Planning; Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Social Justice in the Green City; 372-3872183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085/6085Copyright (c) 2023 Michael Crilly, Georgiana Varna, Chandra Mouli Vemury, Mark Lemon, Andrew Mitchellinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrilly, MichaelVarna, GeorgianaMouli Vemury, ChandraLemon, MarkMitchell, Andrew2023-06-29T21:15:27Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6085Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:42:41.142451Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
title Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
spellingShingle Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
Crilly, Michael
inequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planning
title_short Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
title_full Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
title_fullStr Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
title_full_unstemmed Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
title_sort Building Equality: A “Litmus Test” for Recognising and Evidencing Inequalities and Segregation in the Built Environment
author Crilly, Michael
author_facet Crilly, Michael
Varna, Georgiana
Mouli Vemury, Chandra
Lemon, Mark
Mitchell, Andrew
author_role author
author2 Varna, Georgiana
Mouli Vemury, Chandra
Lemon, Mark
Mitchell, Andrew
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crilly, Michael
Varna, Georgiana
Mouli Vemury, Chandra
Lemon, Mark
Mitchell, Andrew
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv inequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planning
topic inequality; levelling up; litmus test; spatial segregation; UN sustainable development goals; urban planning
description The current convergence of global challenges, particularly the climate change emergency, the Covid-19 pandemic, and the Black Lives Matter movement, have highlighted the need for a new lens to challenge and interrogate key urban planning assumptions related to spatial urban inequality. Yet urban inequality is often and invariably described from a limited economic perspective, commonly interpreted and measured as income inequality. This is an overtly statistical measure, or Gini-Type index, often giving limited and unsatisfactory results. Yet, in practice, the spatial distribution and concentration of income inequality is a multi-scalar, multi-variant, and multi-disciplinary issue and has links with other and wider dimensions of inequality and well-being. As such, this article argues for a holistic understanding of urban inequality that goes beyond narrow empirical and quantitative models. It presents collaborative research that aims to impact the actions of urban professionals, to accurately identify and adequately respond to urban inequalities. Through the establishment of an interdisciplinary expert panel, we have uncovered a series of provisional mechanisms and responses to aid practitioners to achieve more spatial equality. We introduce an integrated analytical method, the “litmus test,” that acts as a planning tool for understanding, evaluating, and responding to inequalities and segregation present in the built environment. This novel methodology and procedural framework will assist us in (a) identifying and defining different forms of inequality and segregation beyond the current scope of physical and agency-based forms; (b) measuring and demonstrating the latter with a combination of qualitative, empirical sources that are materially significant in supporting and evidencing planning strategies; and (c) setting out a series of planning and built environment specific responses.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i1.6085
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6085/6085
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 8, No 1 (2023): Social Justice in the Green City; 372-387
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131513042763776