Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Botelho, Goreti, Caldeira, Ilda, Torres, Amílcar, Ferreira, Fernanda M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388
https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028
Resumo: During the last few years, Portugal has seen an increasing trend in the development of new fruit-based products, such as liquors and spirits. The antioxidant capacity of fruit liquors and spirits, sourced commercially or produced on a pilot-scale, was assessed using two simple spectrophotometric methods: the 2,2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. The major goal of this work was to find which of the two methods is the most suitable and accurate in determining antioxidant capacity for fruit liquors and spirits. In addition, the total phenolic compounds of both kinds of alcoholic beverages were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau method. Despite the widespread use of DPPH assay for distilled drinks, a weak Spearman correlation coefficient (r = 0.023) between ABTS and DPPH methods in spirits were found, as well as, between DPPH values and total phenolic compounds content (r = 0.239). This work highlights the limitations of DPPH assay when used for analysis of samples with very low antioxidant capacity, as distilled spirits.
id RCAP_14103c1f69d5b512ce919693d87dddb6
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/109388
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparisonfruit liquors and spiritstotal antioxidant activityABTSDPPHtotal phenolic compoundslicores de frutos e aguardentescapacidade antioxidante totalABTSDPPHcompostos fenólicos totaisDuring the last few years, Portugal has seen an increasing trend in the development of new fruit-based products, such as liquors and spirits. The antioxidant capacity of fruit liquors and spirits, sourced commercially or produced on a pilot-scale, was assessed using two simple spectrophotometric methods: the 2,2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. The major goal of this work was to find which of the two methods is the most suitable and accurate in determining antioxidant capacity for fruit liquors and spirits. In addition, the total phenolic compounds of both kinds of alcoholic beverages were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau method. Despite the widespread use of DPPH assay for distilled drinks, a weak Spearman correlation coefficient (r = 0.023) between ABTS and DPPH methods in spirits were found, as well as, between DPPH values and total phenolic compounds content (r = 0.239). This work highlights the limitations of DPPH assay when used for analysis of samples with very low antioxidant capacity, as distilled spirits.Portugal, nos últimos anos, tem desenvolvido novos produtos à base de frutos, tais como aguardentes e licores. A capacidade antioxidante dos licores de frutos e aguardentes, obtidos comercialmente ou em produções à escala piloto, foi medida usando dois métodos espetrofotométricos: o 2,2´-azino-bis-(3-etilbenzotiazolina-6-ácido sulfónico) (ABTS) e o 1,1-difenil-2-picrilhidrazil (DPPH). O principal objetivo deste trabalho consistiu em determinar qual o método mais fiável na determinação da capacidade antioxidante total das aguardentes e licores. Adicionalmente, o conteúdo total em compostos fenólicos de ambos os tipos de bebidas alcoólicas foi determinado pelo método de Folin-Ciocalteau. Embora o DPPH seja o método mais utilizado neste tipo de análises, no presente trabalho, no entanto, verificou-se que o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman (r=0.023) entre o ABTS e DPPH é baixo, bem como entre os valores de DPPH e o teor de compostos fenólicos totais (r=0.239). Este trabalho destaca assim as limitações do método de DPPH quando usado em amostras com baixa capacidade antioxidante, como é o caso dos licores de frutos e das aguardentes.Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028eng2416-3953Santos, CarolinaBotelho, GoretiCaldeira, IldaTorres, AmílcarFerreira, Fernanda M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-12T08:48:10Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/109388Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:25:35.085491Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
title Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
spellingShingle Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
Santos, Carolina
fruit liquors and spirits
total antioxidant activity
ABTS
DPPH
total phenolic compounds
licores de frutos e aguardentes
capacidade antioxidante total
ABTS
DPPH
compostos fenólicos totais
title_short Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
title_full Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
title_fullStr Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
title_full_unstemmed Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
title_sort Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
author Santos, Carolina
author_facet Santos, Carolina
Botelho, Goreti
Caldeira, Ilda
Torres, Amílcar
Ferreira, Fernanda M.
author_role author
author2 Botelho, Goreti
Caldeira, Ilda
Torres, Amílcar
Ferreira, Fernanda M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Carolina
Botelho, Goreti
Caldeira, Ilda
Torres, Amílcar
Ferreira, Fernanda M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fruit liquors and spirits
total antioxidant activity
ABTS
DPPH
total phenolic compounds
licores de frutos e aguardentes
capacidade antioxidante total
ABTS
DPPH
compostos fenólicos totais
topic fruit liquors and spirits
total antioxidant activity
ABTS
DPPH
total phenolic compounds
licores de frutos e aguardentes
capacidade antioxidante total
ABTS
DPPH
compostos fenólicos totais
description During the last few years, Portugal has seen an increasing trend in the development of new fruit-based products, such as liquors and spirits. The antioxidant capacity of fruit liquors and spirits, sourced commercially or produced on a pilot-scale, was assessed using two simple spectrophotometric methods: the 2,2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. The major goal of this work was to find which of the two methods is the most suitable and accurate in determining antioxidant capacity for fruit liquors and spirits. In addition, the total phenolic compounds of both kinds of alcoholic beverages were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau method. Despite the widespread use of DPPH assay for distilled drinks, a weak Spearman correlation coefficient (r = 0.023) between ABTS and DPPH methods in spirits were found, as well as, between DPPH values and total phenolic compounds content (r = 0.239). This work highlights the limitations of DPPH assay when used for analysis of samples with very low antioxidant capacity, as distilled spirits.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388
https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388
https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2416-3953
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134138164314112