Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388 https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028 |
Resumo: | During the last few years, Portugal has seen an increasing trend in the development of new fruit-based products, such as liquors and spirits. The antioxidant capacity of fruit liquors and spirits, sourced commercially or produced on a pilot-scale, was assessed using two simple spectrophotometric methods: the 2,2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. The major goal of this work was to find which of the two methods is the most suitable and accurate in determining antioxidant capacity for fruit liquors and spirits. In addition, the total phenolic compounds of both kinds of alcoholic beverages were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau method. Despite the widespread use of DPPH assay for distilled drinks, a weak Spearman correlation coefficient (r = 0.023) between ABTS and DPPH methods in spirits were found, as well as, between DPPH values and total phenolic compounds content (r = 0.239). This work highlights the limitations of DPPH assay when used for analysis of samples with very low antioxidant capacity, as distilled spirits. |
id |
RCAP_14103c1f69d5b512ce919693d87dddb6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/109388 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparisonfruit liquors and spiritstotal antioxidant activityABTSDPPHtotal phenolic compoundslicores de frutos e aguardentescapacidade antioxidante totalABTSDPPHcompostos fenólicos totaisDuring the last few years, Portugal has seen an increasing trend in the development of new fruit-based products, such as liquors and spirits. The antioxidant capacity of fruit liquors and spirits, sourced commercially or produced on a pilot-scale, was assessed using two simple spectrophotometric methods: the 2,2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. The major goal of this work was to find which of the two methods is the most suitable and accurate in determining antioxidant capacity for fruit liquors and spirits. In addition, the total phenolic compounds of both kinds of alcoholic beverages were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau method. Despite the widespread use of DPPH assay for distilled drinks, a weak Spearman correlation coefficient (r = 0.023) between ABTS and DPPH methods in spirits were found, as well as, between DPPH values and total phenolic compounds content (r = 0.239). This work highlights the limitations of DPPH assay when used for analysis of samples with very low antioxidant capacity, as distilled spirits.Portugal, nos últimos anos, tem desenvolvido novos produtos à base de frutos, tais como aguardentes e licores. A capacidade antioxidante dos licores de frutos e aguardentes, obtidos comercialmente ou em produções à escala piloto, foi medida usando dois métodos espetrofotométricos: o 2,2´-azino-bis-(3-etilbenzotiazolina-6-ácido sulfónico) (ABTS) e o 1,1-difenil-2-picrilhidrazil (DPPH). O principal objetivo deste trabalho consistiu em determinar qual o método mais fiável na determinação da capacidade antioxidante total das aguardentes e licores. Adicionalmente, o conteúdo total em compostos fenólicos de ambos os tipos de bebidas alcoólicas foi determinado pelo método de Folin-Ciocalteau. Embora o DPPH seja o método mais utilizado neste tipo de análises, no presente trabalho, no entanto, verificou-se que o coeficiente de correlação de Spearman (r=0.023) entre o ABTS e DPPH é baixo, bem como entre os valores de DPPH e o teor de compostos fenólicos totais (r=0.239). Este trabalho destaca assim as limitações do método de DPPH quando usado em amostras com baixa capacidade antioxidante, como é o caso dos licores de frutos e das aguardentes.Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028eng2416-3953Santos, CarolinaBotelho, GoretiCaldeira, IldaTorres, AmílcarFerreira, Fernanda M.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-12T08:48:10Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/109388Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:25:35.085491Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
title |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
spellingShingle |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison Santos, Carolina fruit liquors and spirits total antioxidant activity ABTS DPPH total phenolic compounds licores de frutos e aguardentes capacidade antioxidante total ABTS DPPH compostos fenólicos totais |
title_short |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
title_full |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
title_fullStr |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
title_full_unstemmed |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
title_sort |
Antioxidant activity assessment in fruit liquors and spirits: methods comparison |
author |
Santos, Carolina |
author_facet |
Santos, Carolina Botelho, Goreti Caldeira, Ilda Torres, Amílcar Ferreira, Fernanda M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Botelho, Goreti Caldeira, Ilda Torres, Amílcar Ferreira, Fernanda M. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Carolina Botelho, Goreti Caldeira, Ilda Torres, Amílcar Ferreira, Fernanda M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
fruit liquors and spirits total antioxidant activity ABTS DPPH total phenolic compounds licores de frutos e aguardentes capacidade antioxidante total ABTS DPPH compostos fenólicos totais |
topic |
fruit liquors and spirits total antioxidant activity ABTS DPPH total phenolic compounds licores de frutos e aguardentes capacidade antioxidante total ABTS DPPH compostos fenólicos totais |
description |
During the last few years, Portugal has seen an increasing trend in the development of new fruit-based products, such as liquors and spirits. The antioxidant capacity of fruit liquors and spirits, sourced commercially or produced on a pilot-scale, was assessed using two simple spectrophotometric methods: the 2,2’-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assays. The major goal of this work was to find which of the two methods is the most suitable and accurate in determining antioxidant capacity for fruit liquors and spirits. In addition, the total phenolic compounds of both kinds of alcoholic beverages were determined by Folin-Ciocalteau method. Despite the widespread use of DPPH assay for distilled drinks, a weak Spearman correlation coefficient (r = 0.023) between ABTS and DPPH methods in spirits were found, as well as, between DPPH values and total phenolic compounds content (r = 0.239). This work highlights the limitations of DPPH assay when used for analysis of samples with very low antioxidant capacity, as distilled spirits. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388 https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109388 https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20142901028 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2416-3953 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agraria e das Pescas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134138164314112 |