Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Vera
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Pereira, Tânia, Eloy, Catarina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215
Resumo: Introduction: The fine-needle aspiration has a significant role in assessing the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. There is uncertainty regarding the value of repeat fine-needle aspiration in benign nodules. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of results in consecutive fine-needle aspiration and to study the relevance of repetition in benign results.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of the 4800 thyroid nodules fine-needle aspiration held in Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto between January 1, 2014 and May 2, 2016. Of the initial sample, we selected the repeated fine-needle aspiration on the same nodule.Results: The first fine-needle aspiration result of the 309 nodules underwent revaluation was non-diagnostic in 103 (33.3%), benign in 120 (38.8%) and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 86 (27.8%). The agreement between the first and second fine-needle aspiration was significantly higher in cases with an initial benign result (benign: 85.8%, non-diagnostic: 27.2% and atypia/ follicular lesion of undetermined significance: 17.4%, p < 0.005). The fine-needle aspiration repeating motifs in initially benign nodules (n = 78) were repetition suggestion in 58, nodule growth in 17 and suspicious ultrasonographic features in 3.Discussion: The fine-needle aspiration repetition in nodules with initial non-diagnostic and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance result changed the initial diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients, modifying their therapeutic approach. The high concordance of results in initially benign nodules makes fine-needle aspiration repetition not cost-effective in most cases.Conclusion: The fine-needle aspiration should be repeated when the initial cytology result is non-diagnostic or atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.
id RCAP_148d83367949ca9e6a8efd3c4e7c989c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?Punção Aspirativa de Nódulos da Tiroide: Vale a Pena Repetir?BiopsyFine-NeedleThyroid NoduleBiópsia por Agulha FinaNódulo da TiroideIntroduction: The fine-needle aspiration has a significant role in assessing the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. There is uncertainty regarding the value of repeat fine-needle aspiration in benign nodules. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of results in consecutive fine-needle aspiration and to study the relevance of repetition in benign results.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of the 4800 thyroid nodules fine-needle aspiration held in Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto between January 1, 2014 and May 2, 2016. Of the initial sample, we selected the repeated fine-needle aspiration on the same nodule.Results: The first fine-needle aspiration result of the 309 nodules underwent revaluation was non-diagnostic in 103 (33.3%), benign in 120 (38.8%) and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 86 (27.8%). The agreement between the first and second fine-needle aspiration was significantly higher in cases with an initial benign result (benign: 85.8%, non-diagnostic: 27.2% and atypia/ follicular lesion of undetermined significance: 17.4%, p < 0.005). The fine-needle aspiration repeating motifs in initially benign nodules (n = 78) were repetition suggestion in 58, nodule growth in 17 and suspicious ultrasonographic features in 3.Discussion: The fine-needle aspiration repetition in nodules with initial non-diagnostic and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance result changed the initial diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients, modifying their therapeutic approach. The high concordance of results in initially benign nodules makes fine-needle aspiration repetition not cost-effective in most cases.Conclusion: The fine-needle aspiration should be repeated when the initial cytology result is non-diagnostic or atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.Introdução: A punção aspirativa por agulha fina tem um papel relevante na avaliação do risco de malignidade de nódulos da tiroide. Persistem dúvidas quanto ao valor da repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina em nódulos com resultado benigno. Este trabalho pretende avaliar a concordância de resultados em punções aspirativas por agulha fina consecutivas e estudar a pertinência da repetição nos resultados benignos.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo dos resultados das 4800 punções aspirativas por agulha fina da tiroide realizadas no Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto entre 1 de janeiro de 2014 e 2 de maio de 2016. Da amostra inicial, selecionaram-se as punções aspirativas por agulha fina repetidas no mesmo nódulo.Resultados: O resultado da primeira punção aspirativa por agulha fina dos 309 nódulos submetidos a reavaliação foi não diagnóstico em 103 (33,3%), benigno em 120 (38,8%) e atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado em 86 (27,8%). A concordância entre a primeira e segunda punção aspirativa por agulha fina foi significativamente mais elevada nos casos com resultado inicial benigno (benigno: 85,8%, não diagnóstico: 27,2% e atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado: 17,4%, p < 0,005). Os motivos de repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina em resultados inicialmente benignos (n = 78) foram a sugestão de repetição em 58, crescimento do nódulo em 17 e características ecográficas suspeitas de malignidade em três.Discussão: A repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina em nódulos com resultado inicial não diagnóstico e atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado alterou o diagnóstico inicial numa proporção significativa de doentes, modificando a sua orientação terapêutica. A elevada concordância de resultados em casos inicialmente benignos torna a repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina não custo-efetiva na maioria dos casos.Conclusão: A repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina deve ser realizada quando o resultado citológico inicial é não diagnóstico ou atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado.Ordem dos Médicos2017-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/pdfapplication/mswordimage/jpeghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 6 (2017): June; 472-478Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 6 (2017): Junho; 472-4781646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5076https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5366https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8763https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8764https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8765https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8766https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8767https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8782https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9185https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9317Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, VeraPereira, TâniaEloy, Catarina2022-12-20T11:05:27Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:33.537110Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
Punção Aspirativa de Nódulos da Tiroide: Vale a Pena Repetir?
title Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
spellingShingle Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
Fernandes, Vera
Biopsy
Fine-Needle
Thyroid Nodule
Biópsia por Agulha Fina
Nódulo da Tiroide
title_short Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
title_full Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
title_fullStr Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
title_full_unstemmed Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
title_sort Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
author Fernandes, Vera
author_facet Fernandes, Vera
Pereira, Tânia
Eloy, Catarina
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Tânia
Eloy, Catarina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Vera
Pereira, Tânia
Eloy, Catarina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopsy
Fine-Needle
Thyroid Nodule
Biópsia por Agulha Fina
Nódulo da Tiroide
topic Biopsy
Fine-Needle
Thyroid Nodule
Biópsia por Agulha Fina
Nódulo da Tiroide
description Introduction: The fine-needle aspiration has a significant role in assessing the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. There is uncertainty regarding the value of repeat fine-needle aspiration in benign nodules. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of results in consecutive fine-needle aspiration and to study the relevance of repetition in benign results.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of the 4800 thyroid nodules fine-needle aspiration held in Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto between January 1, 2014 and May 2, 2016. Of the initial sample, we selected the repeated fine-needle aspiration on the same nodule.Results: The first fine-needle aspiration result of the 309 nodules underwent revaluation was non-diagnostic in 103 (33.3%), benign in 120 (38.8%) and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 86 (27.8%). The agreement between the first and second fine-needle aspiration was significantly higher in cases with an initial benign result (benign: 85.8%, non-diagnostic: 27.2% and atypia/ follicular lesion of undetermined significance: 17.4%, p < 0.005). The fine-needle aspiration repeating motifs in initially benign nodules (n = 78) were repetition suggestion in 58, nodule growth in 17 and suspicious ultrasonographic features in 3.Discussion: The fine-needle aspiration repetition in nodules with initial non-diagnostic and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance result changed the initial diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients, modifying their therapeutic approach. The high concordance of results in initially benign nodules makes fine-needle aspiration repetition not cost-effective in most cases.Conclusion: The fine-needle aspiration should be repeated when the initial cytology result is non-diagnostic or atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5076
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5366
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8763
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8764
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8765
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8766
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8767
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8782
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9185
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9317
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
image/jpeg
application/pdf
application/msword
image/jpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 6 (2017): June; 472-478
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 6 (2017): Junho; 472-478
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1817552984209358848