Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The fine-needle aspiration has a significant role in assessing the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. There is uncertainty regarding the value of repeat fine-needle aspiration in benign nodules. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of results in consecutive fine-needle aspiration and to study the relevance of repetition in benign results.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of the 4800 thyroid nodules fine-needle aspiration held in Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto between January 1, 2014 and May 2, 2016. Of the initial sample, we selected the repeated fine-needle aspiration on the same nodule.Results: The first fine-needle aspiration result of the 309 nodules underwent revaluation was non-diagnostic in 103 (33.3%), benign in 120 (38.8%) and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 86 (27.8%). The agreement between the first and second fine-needle aspiration was significantly higher in cases with an initial benign result (benign: 85.8%, non-diagnostic: 27.2% and atypia/ follicular lesion of undetermined significance: 17.4%, p < 0.005). The fine-needle aspiration repeating motifs in initially benign nodules (n = 78) were repetition suggestion in 58, nodule growth in 17 and suspicious ultrasonographic features in 3.Discussion: The fine-needle aspiration repetition in nodules with initial non-diagnostic and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance result changed the initial diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients, modifying their therapeutic approach. The high concordance of results in initially benign nodules makes fine-needle aspiration repetition not cost-effective in most cases.Conclusion: The fine-needle aspiration should be repeated when the initial cytology result is non-diagnostic or atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance. |
id |
RCAP_148d83367949ca9e6a8efd3c4e7c989c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating?Punção Aspirativa de Nódulos da Tiroide: Vale a Pena Repetir?BiopsyFine-NeedleThyroid NoduleBiópsia por Agulha FinaNódulo da TiroideIntroduction: The fine-needle aspiration has a significant role in assessing the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. There is uncertainty regarding the value of repeat fine-needle aspiration in benign nodules. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of results in consecutive fine-needle aspiration and to study the relevance of repetition in benign results.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of the 4800 thyroid nodules fine-needle aspiration held in Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto between January 1, 2014 and May 2, 2016. Of the initial sample, we selected the repeated fine-needle aspiration on the same nodule.Results: The first fine-needle aspiration result of the 309 nodules underwent revaluation was non-diagnostic in 103 (33.3%), benign in 120 (38.8%) and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 86 (27.8%). The agreement between the first and second fine-needle aspiration was significantly higher in cases with an initial benign result (benign: 85.8%, non-diagnostic: 27.2% and atypia/ follicular lesion of undetermined significance: 17.4%, p < 0.005). The fine-needle aspiration repeating motifs in initially benign nodules (n = 78) were repetition suggestion in 58, nodule growth in 17 and suspicious ultrasonographic features in 3.Discussion: The fine-needle aspiration repetition in nodules with initial non-diagnostic and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance result changed the initial diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients, modifying their therapeutic approach. The high concordance of results in initially benign nodules makes fine-needle aspiration repetition not cost-effective in most cases.Conclusion: The fine-needle aspiration should be repeated when the initial cytology result is non-diagnostic or atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance.Introdução: A punção aspirativa por agulha fina tem um papel relevante na avaliação do risco de malignidade de nódulos da tiroide. Persistem dúvidas quanto ao valor da repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina em nódulos com resultado benigno. Este trabalho pretende avaliar a concordância de resultados em punções aspirativas por agulha fina consecutivas e estudar a pertinência da repetição nos resultados benignos.Material e Métodos: Estudo retrospetivo dos resultados das 4800 punções aspirativas por agulha fina da tiroide realizadas no Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto entre 1 de janeiro de 2014 e 2 de maio de 2016. Da amostra inicial, selecionaram-se as punções aspirativas por agulha fina repetidas no mesmo nódulo.Resultados: O resultado da primeira punção aspirativa por agulha fina dos 309 nódulos submetidos a reavaliação foi não diagnóstico em 103 (33,3%), benigno em 120 (38,8%) e atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado em 86 (27,8%). A concordância entre a primeira e segunda punção aspirativa por agulha fina foi significativamente mais elevada nos casos com resultado inicial benigno (benigno: 85,8%, não diagnóstico: 27,2% e atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado: 17,4%, p < 0,005). Os motivos de repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina em resultados inicialmente benignos (n = 78) foram a sugestão de repetição em 58, crescimento do nódulo em 17 e características ecográficas suspeitas de malignidade em três.Discussão: A repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina em nódulos com resultado inicial não diagnóstico e atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado alterou o diagnóstico inicial numa proporção significativa de doentes, modificando a sua orientação terapêutica. A elevada concordância de resultados em casos inicialmente benignos torna a repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina não custo-efetiva na maioria dos casos.Conclusão: A repetição da punção aspirativa por agulha fina deve ser realizada quando o resultado citológico inicial é não diagnóstico ou atipia/lesão folicular de significado indeterminado.Ordem dos Médicos2017-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegimage/jpegapplication/pdfapplication/mswordimage/jpeghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 6 (2017): June; 472-478Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 6 (2017): Junho; 472-4781646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5076https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5366https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8763https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8764https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8765https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8766https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8767https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8782https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9185https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9317Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, VeraPereira, TâniaEloy, Catarina2022-12-20T11:05:27Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:33.537110Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? Punção Aspirativa de Nódulos da Tiroide: Vale a Pena Repetir? |
title |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? |
spellingShingle |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? Fernandes, Vera Biopsy Fine-Needle Thyroid Nodule Biópsia por Agulha Fina Nódulo da Tiroide |
title_short |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? |
title_full |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? |
title_fullStr |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? |
title_sort |
Fine-needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: Is it Worth Repeating? |
author |
Fernandes, Vera |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Vera Pereira, Tânia Eloy, Catarina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Tânia Eloy, Catarina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Vera Pereira, Tânia Eloy, Catarina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biopsy Fine-Needle Thyroid Nodule Biópsia por Agulha Fina Nódulo da Tiroide |
topic |
Biopsy Fine-Needle Thyroid Nodule Biópsia por Agulha Fina Nódulo da Tiroide |
description |
Introduction: The fine-needle aspiration has a significant role in assessing the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. There is uncertainty regarding the value of repeat fine-needle aspiration in benign nodules. This study aims to evaluate the concordance of results in consecutive fine-needle aspiration and to study the relevance of repetition in benign results.Material and Methods: Retrospective study of the 4800 thyroid nodules fine-needle aspiration held in Instituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto between January 1, 2014 and May 2, 2016. Of the initial sample, we selected the repeated fine-needle aspiration on the same nodule.Results: The first fine-needle aspiration result of the 309 nodules underwent revaluation was non-diagnostic in 103 (33.3%), benign in 120 (38.8%) and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance in 86 (27.8%). The agreement between the first and second fine-needle aspiration was significantly higher in cases with an initial benign result (benign: 85.8%, non-diagnostic: 27.2% and atypia/ follicular lesion of undetermined significance: 17.4%, p < 0.005). The fine-needle aspiration repeating motifs in initially benign nodules (n = 78) were repetition suggestion in 58, nodule growth in 17 and suspicious ultrasonographic features in 3.Discussion: The fine-needle aspiration repetition in nodules with initial non-diagnostic and atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance result changed the initial diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients, modifying their therapeutic approach. The high concordance of results in initially benign nodules makes fine-needle aspiration repetition not cost-effective in most cases.Conclusion: The fine-needle aspiration should be repeated when the initial cytology result is non-diagnostic or atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/8215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5076 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/5366 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8763 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8764 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8765 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8766 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8767 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/8782 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9185 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/8215/9317 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg image/jpeg application/pdf application/msword image/jpeg |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 6 (2017): June; 472-478 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 6 (2017): Junho; 472-478 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817552984209358848 |