Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Manuel Abraul Rosa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/29264
Resumo: This thesis studies the relationship between democracy and government consumption, through the lenses of the median voter model of democratic redistribution developed by Meltzer and Richard. Taking a large sample covering countries across all regions of the world for the 1960-2017 period, I estimate a positive effect of democratization on government consumption, controlling for country and year fixed effects. However, these results are not robust, as high levels of significance are not retained once I take the dynamics of government consumption and the Nickel bias into account. Given potential issues of endogeneity, I also carry out a two-stage least squares (2SLS) strategy, by using regional levels of democracy as an instrument, and my results do not change substantively. The lack of definitive conclusions arising from my empirical analysis suggests the relationship between democracies and government consumption may be more ambiguous than the median voter model of redistribution implies. If, for instance, democracy is “captured” by the elites, levels of redistribution might not be determined by the newly enfranchised segments of the population. Thus, I also discuss some of the reasons why recently democratized nations should not necessarily be expected to increase their levels of government consumption.
id RCAP_157f1cfe2918b43b1df9aa24c5f514ad
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/29264
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?DemocracyRedistributionGovernment consumptionDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e GestãoThis thesis studies the relationship between democracy and government consumption, through the lenses of the median voter model of democratic redistribution developed by Meltzer and Richard. Taking a large sample covering countries across all regions of the world for the 1960-2017 period, I estimate a positive effect of democratization on government consumption, controlling for country and year fixed effects. However, these results are not robust, as high levels of significance are not retained once I take the dynamics of government consumption and the Nickel bias into account. Given potential issues of endogeneity, I also carry out a two-stage least squares (2SLS) strategy, by using regional levels of democracy as an instrument, and my results do not change substantively. The lack of definitive conclusions arising from my empirical analysis suggests the relationship between democracies and government consumption may be more ambiguous than the median voter model of redistribution implies. If, for instance, democracy is “captured” by the elites, levels of redistribution might not be determined by the newly enfranchised segments of the population. Thus, I also discuss some of the reasons why recently democratized nations should not necessarily be expected to increase their levels of government consumption.Nesta tese, estuda-se a relação entre democracia e consumo público, tendo em conta o modelo do eleitor mediano num contexto de redistribuição democrática, desenvolvido por Meltzer and Richard. Considerando uma amostra alargada de países de todas as regiões do mundo para o período 1960-2017, estimo um impacto positivo da democratização no consumo público, controlando os efeitos fixos ao nível do país e ano. Contudo, estes resultados não são robustos, já que os elevados níveis de significância não se mantêm uma vez considerados as dinâmicas do consumo público e o problema do enviesamento de Nickel. Dada a potencial existência de endogeneidade, levo também a cabo uma estratégia de mínimos quadrados em dois estágios (2SLS), usando níveis regionais de democracia como variáveis instrumentais e os meus resultados não se alteram substancialmente. A falta de conclusões definitivas da minha análise empírica sugere que a relação entre democracias e consumo público poderá ser mais ambígua do que o modelo do eleitor mediano presume. Se, por exemplo, uma democracia for “controlada” pela elites, os níveis de redistribuição poderão não ser determinados pelos segmentos da população que acabaram de conquistar poder politico. Assim, discuto também algumas das razões pelas quais não se deverão necessariamente verificar aumentos do consumo público em nações recentemente democratizadas.Evrin, AlperenVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaCruz, Manuel Abraul Rosa2020-01-15T14:54:42Z2019-07-0220192019-07-02T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/29264TID:202301931enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:34:48Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/29264Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:23:29.750779Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
title Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
spellingShingle Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
Cruz, Manuel Abraul Rosa
Democracy
Redistribution
Government consumption
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
title_short Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
title_full Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
title_fullStr Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
title_full_unstemmed Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
title_sort Do democratic governments provide more goods and services?
author Cruz, Manuel Abraul Rosa
author_facet Cruz, Manuel Abraul Rosa
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Evrin, Alperen
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz, Manuel Abraul Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy
Redistribution
Government consumption
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
topic Democracy
Redistribution
Government consumption
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Economia e Gestão
description This thesis studies the relationship between democracy and government consumption, through the lenses of the median voter model of democratic redistribution developed by Meltzer and Richard. Taking a large sample covering countries across all regions of the world for the 1960-2017 period, I estimate a positive effect of democratization on government consumption, controlling for country and year fixed effects. However, these results are not robust, as high levels of significance are not retained once I take the dynamics of government consumption and the Nickel bias into account. Given potential issues of endogeneity, I also carry out a two-stage least squares (2SLS) strategy, by using regional levels of democracy as an instrument, and my results do not change substantively. The lack of definitive conclusions arising from my empirical analysis suggests the relationship between democracies and government consumption may be more ambiguous than the median voter model of redistribution implies. If, for instance, democracy is “captured” by the elites, levels of redistribution might not be determined by the newly enfranchised segments of the population. Thus, I also discuss some of the reasons why recently democratized nations should not necessarily be expected to increase their levels of government consumption.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-02
2019
2019-07-02T00:00:00Z
2020-01-15T14:54:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/29264
TID:202301931
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/29264
identifier_str_mv TID:202301931
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131942515376128