Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, J.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Loureiro, S.
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/27670
Resumo: As societies become aware of environmental issues, a large portion of consumers are adopting more sustainable lifestyles and refraining from buying certain products (EIB, 2021), with environmental motives predicted to be the top choice criteria for as much as 55% of consumers in the next five years (betterRetailing.com, 2021). An area of particular dispute in literature is between adopting self-oriented (e.g., related with improving our social/self-identity) or altruistic (e.g., environmental-related) motives for explaining sustainable consumer behaviors (SCBs). In particular, social norms (SN) and environmental concerns (EC) are the two most frequently assessed predictors of SCBs according to our exploratory literature review, yet with contradictory findings. The aim of this study is to examine whether consumers, confronted with choosing between environmentally sustainable and non-sustainable products, show higher consideration for social self-enhancement, or environmental motives, and observe to what extent does that influence differs across green categories. We address the following research questions: RQ1: Which green product categories are spontaneously mentioned by consumers? RQ2: To what extent did social and/or environmental factors influenced their choices? RQ3: What other motivations and barriers may affect SCBs?
id RCAP_15de3aacaa0e04298fcf11251ce11f57
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/27670
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Three routes for sustainable consumer behavioursAs societies become aware of environmental issues, a large portion of consumers are adopting more sustainable lifestyles and refraining from buying certain products (EIB, 2021), with environmental motives predicted to be the top choice criteria for as much as 55% of consumers in the next five years (betterRetailing.com, 2021). An area of particular dispute in literature is between adopting self-oriented (e.g., related with improving our social/self-identity) or altruistic (e.g., environmental-related) motives for explaining sustainable consumer behaviors (SCBs). In particular, social norms (SN) and environmental concerns (EC) are the two most frequently assessed predictors of SCBs according to our exploratory literature review, yet with contradictory findings. The aim of this study is to examine whether consumers, confronted with choosing between environmentally sustainable and non-sustainable products, show higher consideration for social self-enhancement, or environmental motives, and observe to what extent does that influence differs across green categories. We address the following research questions: RQ1: Which green product categories are spontaneously mentioned by consumers? RQ2: To what extent did social and/or environmental factors influenced their choices? RQ3: What other motivations and barriers may affect SCBs?ANZMAC2023-02-01T14:44:30Z2022-01-01T00:00:00Z20222023-02-01T14:42:53Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/27670eng1447-3275Nascimento, J.Loureiro, S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:23:32Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/27670Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T03:23:32Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
title Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
spellingShingle Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
Nascimento, J.
title_short Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
title_full Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
title_fullStr Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
title_full_unstemmed Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
title_sort Three routes for sustainable consumer behaviours
author Nascimento, J.
author_facet Nascimento, J.
Loureiro, S.
author_role author
author2 Loureiro, S.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, J.
Loureiro, S.
description As societies become aware of environmental issues, a large portion of consumers are adopting more sustainable lifestyles and refraining from buying certain products (EIB, 2021), with environmental motives predicted to be the top choice criteria for as much as 55% of consumers in the next five years (betterRetailing.com, 2021). An area of particular dispute in literature is between adopting self-oriented (e.g., related with improving our social/self-identity) or altruistic (e.g., environmental-related) motives for explaining sustainable consumer behaviors (SCBs). In particular, social norms (SN) and environmental concerns (EC) are the two most frequently assessed predictors of SCBs according to our exploratory literature review, yet with contradictory findings. The aim of this study is to examine whether consumers, confronted with choosing between environmentally sustainable and non-sustainable products, show higher consideration for social self-enhancement, or environmental motives, and observe to what extent does that influence differs across green categories. We address the following research questions: RQ1: Which green product categories are spontaneously mentioned by consumers? RQ2: To what extent did social and/or environmental factors influenced their choices? RQ3: What other motivations and barriers may affect SCBs?
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022
2023-02-01T14:44:30Z
2023-02-01T14:42:53Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference object
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/27670
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/27670
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1447-3275
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANZMAC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ANZMAC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1817546456715755520