From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: d'Auria, Viviana
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Daher, Racha, Rohde, Katharina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688
Resumo: This article sheds light on the lack of cohesion in asylum approaches between EU member states and questions the dominance of the ‘integration’ paradigm. It argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) have, through solidarity, challenged the bias ‘integration’ involves and the exclusion it generates. To do this, it examines three case-based practices led by CSOs that operate in three European capital cities—Rome, Brussels and Berlin—and that embrace mobility in the context of front-line, transit and destination countries, respectively. With the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015 acting as a threshold moment, the cases navigate a complex web of relationships amidst a fragmented debate about asylum, and varying national and local frameworks in Europe. Through the comparison of cases, the article argues that the political possibilities of such practices and their enduring engagements with the urban, remain limited. However, the shift in discourse from ‘stasis’ and ‘integration’ to ‘mobility’ and ‘solidarity’ that the three cases embody, represent a critique that fundamentally challenges urban planning and its role for asylum.
id RCAP_16916947b4d62f7c7b96971dc92a3458
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Citiesasylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarityThis article sheds light on the lack of cohesion in asylum approaches between EU member states and questions the dominance of the ‘integration’ paradigm. It argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) have, through solidarity, challenged the bias ‘integration’ involves and the exclusion it generates. To do this, it examines three case-based practices led by CSOs that operate in three European capital cities—Rome, Brussels and Berlin—and that embrace mobility in the context of front-line, transit and destination countries, respectively. With the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015 acting as a threshold moment, the cases navigate a complex web of relationships amidst a fragmented debate about asylum, and varying national and local frameworks in Europe. Through the comparison of cases, the article argues that the political possibilities of such practices and their enduring engagements with the urban, remain limited. However, the shift in discourse from ‘stasis’ and ‘integration’ to ‘mobility’ and ‘solidarity’ that the three cases embody, represent a critique that fundamentally challenges urban planning and its role for asylum.Cogitatio2018-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688Urban Planning; Vol 3, No 4 (2018): European Cities Planning for Asylum; 79-902183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688/1688Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana d'Auria, Racha Daher, Katharina Rohdehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessd'Auria, VivianaDaher, RachaRohde, Katharina2022-12-20T10:59:20Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:39.887808Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
title From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
spellingShingle From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
d'Auria, Viviana
asylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarity
title_short From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
title_full From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
title_fullStr From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
title_full_unstemmed From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
title_sort From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
author d'Auria, Viviana
author_facet d'Auria, Viviana
Daher, Racha
Rohde, Katharina
author_role author
author2 Daher, Racha
Rohde, Katharina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv d'Auria, Viviana
Daher, Racha
Rohde, Katharina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv asylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarity
topic asylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarity
description This article sheds light on the lack of cohesion in asylum approaches between EU member states and questions the dominance of the ‘integration’ paradigm. It argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) have, through solidarity, challenged the bias ‘integration’ involves and the exclusion it generates. To do this, it examines three case-based practices led by CSOs that operate in three European capital cities—Rome, Brussels and Berlin—and that embrace mobility in the context of front-line, transit and destination countries, respectively. With the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015 acting as a threshold moment, the cases navigate a complex web of relationships amidst a fragmented debate about asylum, and varying national and local frameworks in Europe. Through the comparison of cases, the article argues that the political possibilities of such practices and their enduring engagements with the urban, remain limited. However, the shift in discourse from ‘stasis’ and ‘integration’ to ‘mobility’ and ‘solidarity’ that the three cases embody, represent a critique that fundamentally challenges urban planning and its role for asylum.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-20
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688/1688
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana d'Auria, Racha Daher, Katharina Rohde
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana d'Auria, Racha Daher, Katharina Rohde
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 3, No 4 (2018): European Cities Planning for Asylum; 79-90
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130663576666112