From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688 |
Resumo: | This article sheds light on the lack of cohesion in asylum approaches between EU member states and questions the dominance of the ‘integration’ paradigm. It argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) have, through solidarity, challenged the bias ‘integration’ involves and the exclusion it generates. To do this, it examines three case-based practices led by CSOs that operate in three European capital cities—Rome, Brussels and Berlin—and that embrace mobility in the context of front-line, transit and destination countries, respectively. With the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015 acting as a threshold moment, the cases navigate a complex web of relationships amidst a fragmented debate about asylum, and varying national and local frameworks in Europe. Through the comparison of cases, the article argues that the political possibilities of such practices and their enduring engagements with the urban, remain limited. However, the shift in discourse from ‘stasis’ and ‘integration’ to ‘mobility’ and ‘solidarity’ that the three cases embody, represent a critique that fundamentally challenges urban planning and its role for asylum. |
id |
RCAP_16916947b4d62f7c7b96971dc92a3458 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Citiesasylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarityThis article sheds light on the lack of cohesion in asylum approaches between EU member states and questions the dominance of the ‘integration’ paradigm. It argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) have, through solidarity, challenged the bias ‘integration’ involves and the exclusion it generates. To do this, it examines three case-based practices led by CSOs that operate in three European capital cities—Rome, Brussels and Berlin—and that embrace mobility in the context of front-line, transit and destination countries, respectively. With the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015 acting as a threshold moment, the cases navigate a complex web of relationships amidst a fragmented debate about asylum, and varying national and local frameworks in Europe. Through the comparison of cases, the article argues that the political possibilities of such practices and their enduring engagements with the urban, remain limited. However, the shift in discourse from ‘stasis’ and ‘integration’ to ‘mobility’ and ‘solidarity’ that the three cases embody, represent a critique that fundamentally challenges urban planning and its role for asylum.Cogitatio2018-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688Urban Planning; Vol 3, No 4 (2018): European Cities Planning for Asylum; 79-902183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688/1688Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana d'Auria, Racha Daher, Katharina Rohdehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessd'Auria, VivianaDaher, RachaRohde, Katharina2022-12-20T10:59:20Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:39.887808Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
title |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
spellingShingle |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities d'Auria, Viviana asylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarity |
title_short |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
title_full |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
title_fullStr |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
title_full_unstemmed |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
title_sort |
From Integration to Solidarity: Insights from Civil Society Organisations in Three European Cities |
author |
d'Auria, Viviana |
author_facet |
d'Auria, Viviana Daher, Racha Rohde, Katharina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Daher, Racha Rohde, Katharina |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
d'Auria, Viviana Daher, Racha Rohde, Katharina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
asylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarity |
topic |
asylum; civil society organisations; displacement; integration; solidarity |
description |
This article sheds light on the lack of cohesion in asylum approaches between EU member states and questions the dominance of the ‘integration’ paradigm. It argues that civil society organisations (CSOs) have, through solidarity, challenged the bias ‘integration’ involves and the exclusion it generates. To do this, it examines three case-based practices led by CSOs that operate in three European capital cities—Rome, Brussels and Berlin—and that embrace mobility in the context of front-line, transit and destination countries, respectively. With the ‘refugee crisis’ of 2015 acting as a threshold moment, the cases navigate a complex web of relationships amidst a fragmented debate about asylum, and varying national and local frameworks in Europe. Through the comparison of cases, the article argues that the political possibilities of such practices and their enduring engagements with the urban, remain limited. However, the shift in discourse from ‘stasis’ and ‘integration’ to ‘mobility’ and ‘solidarity’ that the three cases embody, represent a critique that fundamentally challenges urban planning and its role for asylum. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-20 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1688 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v3i4.1688 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1688/1688 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana d'Auria, Racha Daher, Katharina Rohde http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Viviana d'Auria, Racha Daher, Katharina Rohde http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Urban Planning; Vol 3, No 4 (2018): European Cities Planning for Asylum; 79-90 2183-7635 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130663576666112 |