The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22274 |
Resumo: | As part of managerial reform process, in 2004 the Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) was set up in Portugal. This study aimed to analyze the perceptions of Portuguese civil servants on this appraisal system. A second drive was to understand how those perceptions change depending on what extent the model is perceived as fair or not. A survey was carried out and data were collected from 2066 civil servants, including managers. The results show very negative perceptions, in particular regarding SIADAP’s objectivity, transparency and fairness. Also, Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc paired comparisons reveal that civil servants who see the system as “unfair” tend to have more negative perceptions on it than those who see it as “fair” or those who are not sure about the fairness of the system. |
id |
RCAP_1721b40b05b8e1fbe69929c673ddead5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22274 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptionsPublic administrationPerformance appraisalPerceptionsNew public managementAs part of managerial reform process, in 2004 the Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) was set up in Portugal. This study aimed to analyze the perceptions of Portuguese civil servants on this appraisal system. A second drive was to understand how those perceptions change depending on what extent the model is perceived as fair or not. A survey was carried out and data were collected from 2066 civil servants, including managers. The results show very negative perceptions, in particular regarding SIADAP’s objectivity, transparency and fairness. Also, Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc paired comparisons reveal that civil servants who see the system as “unfair” tend to have more negative perceptions on it than those who see it as “fair” or those who are not sure about the fairness of the system.Taylor and Francis2021-07-29T00:00:00Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-03-04T14:26:54Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22274eng0190-069210.1080/01900692.2020.1719510Madureira, C.Rando, B.Ferraz, D.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:37:33Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22274Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:17:08.035570Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
title |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
spellingShingle |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions Madureira, C. Public administration Performance appraisal Perceptions New public management |
title_short |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
title_full |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
title_fullStr |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
title_sort |
The Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) and the Portuguese civil servants perceptions |
author |
Madureira, C. |
author_facet |
Madureira, C. Rando, B. Ferraz, D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rando, B. Ferraz, D. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Madureira, C. Rando, B. Ferraz, D. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Public administration Performance appraisal Perceptions New public management |
topic |
Public administration Performance appraisal Perceptions New public management |
description |
As part of managerial reform process, in 2004 the Public Administration Performance Appraisal Integrated System (SIADAP) was set up in Portugal. This study aimed to analyze the perceptions of Portuguese civil servants on this appraisal system. A second drive was to understand how those perceptions change depending on what extent the model is perceived as fair or not. A survey was carried out and data were collected from 2066 civil servants, including managers. The results show very negative perceptions, in particular regarding SIADAP’s objectivity, transparency and fairness. Also, Kruskal-Wallis tests and post-hoc paired comparisons reveal that civil servants who see the system as “unfair” tend to have more negative perceptions on it than those who see it as “fair” or those who are not sure about the fairness of the system. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-29T00:00:00Z 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2021 2021-03-04T14:26:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22274 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22274 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0190-0692 10.1080/01900692.2020.1719510 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134730371727360 |