A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, D. L.
Data de Publicação: 2024
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31167
Resumo: Monogamy is deeply rooted in most Western societies, shaping how people construe and behave in romantic relationships. These normative views facilitate the emergence of negative perceptions and evaluations when people choose not to adhere to mononormativity. Even though people in consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationships are targets of stigmatization, research shows a dichotomy between these negative views and the relational experiences of CNM people. Indeed, people in CNM and monogamous relationships have comparable relationship functioning and quality and struggle with similar relationship problems. One of the differences is that CNM relationships afford people to explore their sexuality and fulfill their needs with multiple partners, without agreed-upon extradyadic behavior being perceived as infidelity or having deleterious consequences to relationship maintenance. These positive experiences notwithstanding, CNM people are continuously pressured by mononormativity and stigmatization, increasing the risk of internalized CNM negativity and worse personal and relational outcomes. One possible way to counteract CNM stigmatization and improve the lives of CNM people is by changing discourses surrounding non-monogamy and improving acceptance, not only in professional settings but also in the general population. Another strategy is to understand how the relationship beliefs and scripts of younger generations can help promote more inclusive and diverse societies
id RCAP_1a2cea85fc644c4276e952da0a33b504
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/31167
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous peopleConsensual non-monogamyMononormativityStigmatizationRelationship functioningInternalized negativityMonogamy is deeply rooted in most Western societies, shaping how people construe and behave in romantic relationships. These normative views facilitate the emergence of negative perceptions and evaluations when people choose not to adhere to mononormativity. Even though people in consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationships are targets of stigmatization, research shows a dichotomy between these negative views and the relational experiences of CNM people. Indeed, people in CNM and monogamous relationships have comparable relationship functioning and quality and struggle with similar relationship problems. One of the differences is that CNM relationships afford people to explore their sexuality and fulfill their needs with multiple partners, without agreed-upon extradyadic behavior being perceived as infidelity or having deleterious consequences to relationship maintenance. These positive experiences notwithstanding, CNM people are continuously pressured by mononormativity and stigmatization, increasing the risk of internalized CNM negativity and worse personal and relational outcomes. One possible way to counteract CNM stigmatization and improve the lives of CNM people is by changing discourses surrounding non-monogamy and improving acceptance, not only in professional settings but also in the general population. Another strategy is to understand how the relationship beliefs and scripts of younger generations can help promote more inclusive and diverse societiesSpringer2024-02-23T11:31:34Z2024-01-01T00:00:00Z20242024-02-23T11:30:56Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/31167eng0004-000210.1007/s10508-023-02786-1Rodrigues, D. L.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-25T01:18:33Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/31167Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:11:20.017690Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
title A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
spellingShingle A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
Rodrigues, D. L.
Consensual non-monogamy
Mononormativity
Stigmatization
Relationship functioning
Internalized negativity
title_short A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
title_full A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
title_fullStr A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
title_full_unstemmed A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
title_sort A narrative review of the dichotomy between the social views of non-monogamy and the experiences of consensual non-monogamous people
author Rodrigues, D. L.
author_facet Rodrigues, D. L.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, D. L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Consensual non-monogamy
Mononormativity
Stigmatization
Relationship functioning
Internalized negativity
topic Consensual non-monogamy
Mononormativity
Stigmatization
Relationship functioning
Internalized negativity
description Monogamy is deeply rooted in most Western societies, shaping how people construe and behave in romantic relationships. These normative views facilitate the emergence of negative perceptions and evaluations when people choose not to adhere to mononormativity. Even though people in consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationships are targets of stigmatization, research shows a dichotomy between these negative views and the relational experiences of CNM people. Indeed, people in CNM and monogamous relationships have comparable relationship functioning and quality and struggle with similar relationship problems. One of the differences is that CNM relationships afford people to explore their sexuality and fulfill their needs with multiple partners, without agreed-upon extradyadic behavior being perceived as infidelity or having deleterious consequences to relationship maintenance. These positive experiences notwithstanding, CNM people are continuously pressured by mononormativity and stigmatization, increasing the risk of internalized CNM negativity and worse personal and relational outcomes. One possible way to counteract CNM stigmatization and improve the lives of CNM people is by changing discourses surrounding non-monogamy and improving acceptance, not only in professional settings but also in the general population. Another strategy is to understand how the relationship beliefs and scripts of younger generations can help promote more inclusive and diverse societies
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-23T11:31:34Z
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
2024
2024-02-23T11:30:56Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31167
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31167
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0004-0002
10.1007/s10508-023-02786-1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137763390390272