What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, D. L.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Lopes, D., Huic, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793
Resumo: We built upon a recent study by Rodrigues et al. (2018) by investigating potential mechanisms driving the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous (CNM) partners. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we asked 202 Portuguese individuals (158 women; Mage = 29.17, SD = 9.97) to read the description of two partners in either a monogamous, open, or polyamorous relationship, and to make a series of judgments about both partners. Results showed the expected dehumanization effect, such that both groups of CNM partners (open and polyamorous) were attributed more primary (vs. secondary) emotions, whereas the reverse was true for monogamous partners. Moreover, results showed that the dehumanization effect was driven by the perception of CNM partners as less moral and less committed to their relationship. However, these findings were observed only for individuals with unfavorable (vs. favorable) attitudes toward CNM relationship. Overall, this study replicated the original findings and extended our understanding of why people in CNM relationships are stigmatized.
id RCAP_be90ace2e5f5ce50387f1af17d0cfe8f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22793
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?DehumanizationConsensual non-monogamy (CNM)MoralityCommitmentStigmatizationWe built upon a recent study by Rodrigues et al. (2018) by investigating potential mechanisms driving the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous (CNM) partners. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we asked 202 Portuguese individuals (158 women; Mage = 29.17, SD = 9.97) to read the description of two partners in either a monogamous, open, or polyamorous relationship, and to make a series of judgments about both partners. Results showed the expected dehumanization effect, such that both groups of CNM partners (open and polyamorous) were attributed more primary (vs. secondary) emotions, whereas the reverse was true for monogamous partners. Moreover, results showed that the dehumanization effect was driven by the perception of CNM partners as less moral and less committed to their relationship. However, these findings were observed only for individuals with unfavorable (vs. favorable) attitudes toward CNM relationship. Overall, this study replicated the original findings and extended our understanding of why people in CNM relationships are stigmatized.Springer2021-06-22T13:12:45Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z20212021-06-22T14:02:47Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793eng0004-000210.1007/s10508-020-01895-5Rodrigues, D. L.Lopes, D.Huic, A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T18:00:02Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22793Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:31:42.623190Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
title What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
spellingShingle What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
Rodrigues, D. L.
Dehumanization
Consensual non-monogamy (CNM)
Morality
Commitment
Stigmatization
title_short What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
title_full What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
title_fullStr What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
title_full_unstemmed What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
title_sort What drives the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous partners?
author Rodrigues, D. L.
author_facet Rodrigues, D. L.
Lopes, D.
Huic, A.
author_role author
author2 Lopes, D.
Huic, A.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, D. L.
Lopes, D.
Huic, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dehumanization
Consensual non-monogamy (CNM)
Morality
Commitment
Stigmatization
topic Dehumanization
Consensual non-monogamy (CNM)
Morality
Commitment
Stigmatization
description We built upon a recent study by Rodrigues et al. (2018) by investigating potential mechanisms driving the dehumanization of consensual non-monogamous (CNM) partners. Using a between-subjects experimental design, we asked 202 Portuguese individuals (158 women; Mage = 29.17, SD = 9.97) to read the description of two partners in either a monogamous, open, or polyamorous relationship, and to make a series of judgments about both partners. Results showed the expected dehumanization effect, such that both groups of CNM partners (open and polyamorous) were attributed more primary (vs. secondary) emotions, whereas the reverse was true for monogamous partners. Moreover, results showed that the dehumanization effect was driven by the perception of CNM partners as less moral and less committed to their relationship. However, these findings were observed only for individuals with unfavorable (vs. favorable) attitudes toward CNM relationship. Overall, this study replicated the original findings and extended our understanding of why people in CNM relationships are stigmatized.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-22T13:12:45Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
2021-06-22T14:02:47Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22793
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0004-0002
10.1007/s10508-020-01895-5
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134878771445760