African exceptions: democratic development in small island states
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22804 |
Resumo: | Small island states are much more likely to have democratic regimes than large continental states. This trend also holds across Africa, where the five island states with populations of 1.5 million or less are all rated at least ‘partly free’ by Freedom House. In this article we explore what it is about being a small island state that might explain this trend. Building on studies from other small island states, we find that the interaction between the two contextual factors is key to explaining their diversion from mainland trends in the African context. Specifically, ‘smallness’ leads to closer links between citizens and politicians in addition to more effective service delivery, while ‘islandness’ promotes community cohesion and provides a buffer against instability and conflict in neighbouring states. This results in a positive feedback loop that guards against authoritarian excess. Our focus on population size and geography thus adds to the existing studies of the contextual drivers of African democratisation. |
id |
RCAP_1aef24ed3d290cde19d1e29c7158aa20 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22804 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island statesAfricaSmall island statesDemocratizationElite-citizen linksCommunity cohesionInformal politicsSmall island states are much more likely to have democratic regimes than large continental states. This trend also holds across Africa, where the five island states with populations of 1.5 million or less are all rated at least ‘partly free’ by Freedom House. In this article we explore what it is about being a small island state that might explain this trend. Building on studies from other small island states, we find that the interaction between the two contextual factors is key to explaining their diversion from mainland trends in the African context. Specifically, ‘smallness’ leads to closer links between citizens and politicians in addition to more effective service delivery, while ‘islandness’ promotes community cohesion and provides a buffer against instability and conflict in neighbouring states. This results in a positive feedback loop that guards against authoritarian excess. Our focus on population size and geography thus adds to the existing studies of the contextual drivers of African democratisation.Pallgrave Macmillan2022-06-08T00:00:00Z2022-01-01T00:00:00Z20222022-04-08T12:40:54Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22804eng1408-698010.1057/s41268-021-00223-1Sanches, E.Cheeseman, N.Veenendaal, W.Corbett, J.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:31:30Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22804Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:14:10.831703Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
title |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
spellingShingle |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states Sanches, E. Africa Small island states Democratization Elite-citizen links Community cohesion Informal politics |
title_short |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
title_full |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
title_fullStr |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
title_full_unstemmed |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
title_sort |
African exceptions: democratic development in small island states |
author |
Sanches, E. |
author_facet |
Sanches, E. Cheeseman, N. Veenendaal, W. Corbett, J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cheeseman, N. Veenendaal, W. Corbett, J. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sanches, E. Cheeseman, N. Veenendaal, W. Corbett, J. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Africa Small island states Democratization Elite-citizen links Community cohesion Informal politics |
topic |
Africa Small island states Democratization Elite-citizen links Community cohesion Informal politics |
description |
Small island states are much more likely to have democratic regimes than large continental states. This trend also holds across Africa, where the five island states with populations of 1.5 million or less are all rated at least ‘partly free’ by Freedom House. In this article we explore what it is about being a small island state that might explain this trend. Building on studies from other small island states, we find that the interaction between the two contextual factors is key to explaining their diversion from mainland trends in the African context. Specifically, ‘smallness’ leads to closer links between citizens and politicians in addition to more effective service delivery, while ‘islandness’ promotes community cohesion and provides a buffer against instability and conflict in neighbouring states. This results in a positive feedback loop that guards against authoritarian excess. Our focus on population size and geography thus adds to the existing studies of the contextual drivers of African democratisation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-08T00:00:00Z 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022 2022-04-08T12:40:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22804 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22804 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1408-6980 10.1057/s41268-021-00223-1 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pallgrave Macmillan |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pallgrave Macmillan |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134698395402240 |