Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009 |
Resumo: | There is currently no consensus on the treatment sequence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it is recognized that early diagnosis is of paramount importance to start treatment in the early stages of the disease. Although it is fairly consensual that initial treatment should be with an inhaled short-acting beta agonist, a short-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. As the disease progresses, several therapeutic options are available, and which to choose at each disease stage remains controversial. When and in which patients to use dual bronchodilation? When to use inhaled corticosteroids? And triple therapy? Are the existing non-inhaled therapies, such as mucolytic agents, antibiotics, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, methylxanthines and immunostimulating agents, useful? If so, which patients would benefit? Should co-morbidities be taken into account when choosing COPD therapy for a patient? This paper reviews current guidelines and available evidence and proposes a therapeutic scheme for COPD patients. We also propose a treatment algorithm in the hope that it will help physicians to decide the best approach for their patients. The authors conclude that, at present, a full consensus on optimal treatment sequence in COPD cannot be found, mainly due to disease heterogeneity and lack of biomarkers to guide treatment. For the time being, and although some therapeutic approaches are consensual, treatment of COPD should be patient-oriented. |
id |
RCAP_1caf0f228ef8ec9be927d07014af682d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/102243 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?COPDICSLABALAMANon-inhaled therapiesSABASAMATreatment sequenceTriple therapyClinical ProtocolsConsensus Development Conferences as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationEarly Medical InterventionHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveThere is currently no consensus on the treatment sequence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it is recognized that early diagnosis is of paramount importance to start treatment in the early stages of the disease. Although it is fairly consensual that initial treatment should be with an inhaled short-acting beta agonist, a short-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. As the disease progresses, several therapeutic options are available, and which to choose at each disease stage remains controversial. When and in which patients to use dual bronchodilation? When to use inhaled corticosteroids? And triple therapy? Are the existing non-inhaled therapies, such as mucolytic agents, antibiotics, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, methylxanthines and immunostimulating agents, useful? If so, which patients would benefit? Should co-morbidities be taken into account when choosing COPD therapy for a patient? This paper reviews current guidelines and available evidence and proposes a therapeutic scheme for COPD patients. We also propose a treatment algorithm in the hope that it will help physicians to decide the best approach for their patients. The authors conclude that, at present, a full consensus on optimal treatment sequence in COPD cannot be found, mainly due to disease heterogeneity and lack of biomarkers to guide treatment. For the time being, and although some therapeutic approaches are consensual, treatment of COPD should be patient-oriented.2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009por21735115Ferreira, JDrummond, MPires, NReis, GAlves, CCordeiro, C. Robaloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-29T20:40:46Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/102243Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:19:16.802121Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
title |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
spellingShingle |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? Ferreira, J COPD ICS LABA LAMA Non-inhaled therapies SABA SAMA Treatment sequence Triple therapy Clinical Protocols Consensus Development Conferences as Topic Drug Therapy, Combination Early Medical Intervention Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
title_short |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
title_full |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
title_fullStr |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
title_sort |
Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found? |
author |
Ferreira, J |
author_facet |
Ferreira, J Drummond, M Pires, N Reis, G Alves, C Cordeiro, C. Robalo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Drummond, M Pires, N Reis, G Alves, C Cordeiro, C. Robalo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, J Drummond, M Pires, N Reis, G Alves, C Cordeiro, C. Robalo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COPD ICS LABA LAMA Non-inhaled therapies SABA SAMA Treatment sequence Triple therapy Clinical Protocols Consensus Development Conferences as Topic Drug Therapy, Combination Early Medical Intervention Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
topic |
COPD ICS LABA LAMA Non-inhaled therapies SABA SAMA Treatment sequence Triple therapy Clinical Protocols Consensus Development Conferences as Topic Drug Therapy, Combination Early Medical Intervention Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
description |
There is currently no consensus on the treatment sequence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it is recognized that early diagnosis is of paramount importance to start treatment in the early stages of the disease. Although it is fairly consensual that initial treatment should be with an inhaled short-acting beta agonist, a short-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. As the disease progresses, several therapeutic options are available, and which to choose at each disease stage remains controversial. When and in which patients to use dual bronchodilation? When to use inhaled corticosteroids? And triple therapy? Are the existing non-inhaled therapies, such as mucolytic agents, antibiotics, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, methylxanthines and immunostimulating agents, useful? If so, which patients would benefit? Should co-morbidities be taken into account when choosing COPD therapy for a patient? This paper reviews current guidelines and available evidence and proposes a therapeutic scheme for COPD patients. We also propose a treatment algorithm in the hope that it will help physicians to decide the best approach for their patients. The authors conclude that, at present, a full consensus on optimal treatment sequence in COPD cannot be found, mainly due to disease heterogeneity and lack of biomarkers to guide treatment. For the time being, and although some therapeutic approaches are consensual, treatment of COPD should be patient-oriented. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
21735115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134087086080000 |