Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, J
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Drummond, M, Pires, N, Reis, G, Alves, C, Cordeiro, C. Robalo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009
Resumo: There is currently no consensus on the treatment sequence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it is recognized that early diagnosis is of paramount importance to start treatment in the early stages of the disease. Although it is fairly consensual that initial treatment should be with an inhaled short-acting beta agonist, a short-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. As the disease progresses, several therapeutic options are available, and which to choose at each disease stage remains controversial. When and in which patients to use dual bronchodilation? When to use inhaled corticosteroids? And triple therapy? Are the existing non-inhaled therapies, such as mucolytic agents, antibiotics, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, methylxanthines and immunostimulating agents, useful? If so, which patients would benefit? Should co-morbidities be taken into account when choosing COPD therapy for a patient? This paper reviews current guidelines and available evidence and proposes a therapeutic scheme for COPD patients. We also propose a treatment algorithm in the hope that it will help physicians to decide the best approach for their patients. The authors conclude that, at present, a full consensus on optimal treatment sequence in COPD cannot be found, mainly due to disease heterogeneity and lack of biomarkers to guide treatment. For the time being, and although some therapeutic approaches are consensual, treatment of COPD should be patient-oriented.
id RCAP_1caf0f228ef8ec9be927d07014af682d
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/102243
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?COPDICSLABALAMANon-inhaled therapiesSABASAMATreatment sequenceTriple therapyClinical ProtocolsConsensus Development Conferences as TopicDrug Therapy, CombinationEarly Medical InterventionHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveThere is currently no consensus on the treatment sequence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it is recognized that early diagnosis is of paramount importance to start treatment in the early stages of the disease. Although it is fairly consensual that initial treatment should be with an inhaled short-acting beta agonist, a short-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. As the disease progresses, several therapeutic options are available, and which to choose at each disease stage remains controversial. When and in which patients to use dual bronchodilation? When to use inhaled corticosteroids? And triple therapy? Are the existing non-inhaled therapies, such as mucolytic agents, antibiotics, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, methylxanthines and immunostimulating agents, useful? If so, which patients would benefit? Should co-morbidities be taken into account when choosing COPD therapy for a patient? This paper reviews current guidelines and available evidence and proposes a therapeutic scheme for COPD patients. We also propose a treatment algorithm in the hope that it will help physicians to decide the best approach for their patients. The authors conclude that, at present, a full consensus on optimal treatment sequence in COPD cannot be found, mainly due to disease heterogeneity and lack of biomarkers to guide treatment. For the time being, and although some therapeutic approaches are consensual, treatment of COPD should be patient-oriented.2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009por21735115Ferreira, JDrummond, MPires, NReis, GAlves, CCordeiro, C. Robaloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-29T20:40:46Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/102243Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:19:16.802121Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
title Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
spellingShingle Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
Ferreira, J
COPD
ICS
LABA
LAMA
Non-inhaled therapies
SABA
SAMA
Treatment sequence
Triple therapy
Clinical Protocols
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
Drug Therapy, Combination
Early Medical Intervention
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
title_short Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
title_full Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
title_fullStr Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
title_full_unstemmed Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
title_sort Optimal treatment sequence in COPD: Can a consensus be found?
author Ferreira, J
author_facet Ferreira, J
Drummond, M
Pires, N
Reis, G
Alves, C
Cordeiro, C. Robalo
author_role author
author2 Drummond, M
Pires, N
Reis, G
Alves, C
Cordeiro, C. Robalo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, J
Drummond, M
Pires, N
Reis, G
Alves, C
Cordeiro, C. Robalo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv COPD
ICS
LABA
LAMA
Non-inhaled therapies
SABA
SAMA
Treatment sequence
Triple therapy
Clinical Protocols
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
Drug Therapy, Combination
Early Medical Intervention
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
topic COPD
ICS
LABA
LAMA
Non-inhaled therapies
SABA
SAMA
Treatment sequence
Triple therapy
Clinical Protocols
Consensus Development Conferences as Topic
Drug Therapy, Combination
Early Medical Intervention
Humans
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
description There is currently no consensus on the treatment sequence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although it is recognized that early diagnosis is of paramount importance to start treatment in the early stages of the disease. Although it is fairly consensual that initial treatment should be with an inhaled short-acting beta agonist, a short-acting muscarinic antagonist, a long-acting beta-agonist or a long-acting muscarinic antagonist. As the disease progresses, several therapeutic options are available, and which to choose at each disease stage remains controversial. When and in which patients to use dual bronchodilation? When to use inhaled corticosteroids? And triple therapy? Are the existing non-inhaled therapies, such as mucolytic agents, antibiotics, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, methylxanthines and immunostimulating agents, useful? If so, which patients would benefit? Should co-morbidities be taken into account when choosing COPD therapy for a patient? This paper reviews current guidelines and available evidence and proposes a therapeutic scheme for COPD patients. We also propose a treatment algorithm in the hope that it will help physicians to decide the best approach for their patients. The authors conclude that, at present, a full consensus on optimal treatment sequence in COPD cannot be found, mainly due to disease heterogeneity and lack of biomarkers to guide treatment. For the time being, and although some therapeutic approaches are consensual, treatment of COPD should be patient-oriented.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/102243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.10.009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 21735115
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134087086080000