COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10316/108893 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.12.012 |
Resumo: | Current guidelines differ slightly on the recommendations for treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, and although there are some undisputed recommendations, there is still debate regarding the management of COPD. One of the hindrances to deciding which therapeutic approach to choose is late diagnosis or misdiagnosis of COPD. After a proper diagnosis is achieved and severity assessed, the choice between a stepwise or "hit hard" approach has to be made. For GOLD A patients the stepwise approach is recommended, whilst for B, C and D patients this remains debatable. Moreover, in patients for whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended, a step-up or "hit hard" approach with triple therapy will depend on the patient's characteristics and, for patients who are being over-treated with ICS, ICS withdrawal should be performed, in order to optimize therapy and reduce excessive medications. This paper discusses and proposes stepwise, "hit hard", step-up and ICS withdrawal therapeutic approaches for COPD patients based on their GOLD group. We conclude that all approaches have benefits, and only a careful patient selection will determine which approach is better, and which patients will benefit the most from each approach. |
id |
RCAP_fe3f7f7c1e39441225b744b40ce8ad62 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/108893 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach?COPDStepwiseHit hardStep-upICS withdrawalBronchodilatorsICSAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCurrent guidelines differ slightly on the recommendations for treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, and although there are some undisputed recommendations, there is still debate regarding the management of COPD. One of the hindrances to deciding which therapeutic approach to choose is late diagnosis or misdiagnosis of COPD. After a proper diagnosis is achieved and severity assessed, the choice between a stepwise or "hit hard" approach has to be made. For GOLD A patients the stepwise approach is recommended, whilst for B, C and D patients this remains debatable. Moreover, in patients for whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended, a step-up or "hit hard" approach with triple therapy will depend on the patient's characteristics and, for patients who are being over-treated with ICS, ICS withdrawal should be performed, in order to optimize therapy and reduce excessive medications. This paper discusses and proposes stepwise, "hit hard", step-up and ICS withdrawal therapeutic approaches for COPD patients based on their GOLD group. We conclude that all approaches have benefits, and only a careful patient selection will determine which approach is better, and which patients will benefit the most from each approach.Elsevier2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/108893http://hdl.handle.net/10316/108893https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.12.012eng21735115Ferreira, A. J.Reis, A.Marçal, N.Pinto, P.Bárbara, C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-09-22T10:23:49Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/108893Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:25:07.896771Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
title |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
spellingShingle |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? Ferreira, A. J. COPD Stepwise Hit hard Step-up ICS withdrawal Bronchodilators ICS Administration, Inhalation Adrenal Cortex Hormones Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
title_short |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
title_full |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
title_fullStr |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
title_full_unstemmed |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
title_sort |
COPD: A stepwise or a hit hard approach? |
author |
Ferreira, A. J. |
author_facet |
Ferreira, A. J. Reis, A. Marçal, N. Pinto, P. Bárbara, C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Reis, A. Marçal, N. Pinto, P. Bárbara, C. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, A. J. Reis, A. Marçal, N. Pinto, P. Bárbara, C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
COPD Stepwise Hit hard Step-up ICS withdrawal Bronchodilators ICS Administration, Inhalation Adrenal Cortex Hormones Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
topic |
COPD Stepwise Hit hard Step-up ICS withdrawal Bronchodilators ICS Administration, Inhalation Adrenal Cortex Hormones Humans Practice Guidelines as Topic Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
description |
Current guidelines differ slightly on the recommendations for treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients, and although there are some undisputed recommendations, there is still debate regarding the management of COPD. One of the hindrances to deciding which therapeutic approach to choose is late diagnosis or misdiagnosis of COPD. After a proper diagnosis is achieved and severity assessed, the choice between a stepwise or "hit hard" approach has to be made. For GOLD A patients the stepwise approach is recommended, whilst for B, C and D patients this remains debatable. Moreover, in patients for whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended, a step-up or "hit hard" approach with triple therapy will depend on the patient's characteristics and, for patients who are being over-treated with ICS, ICS withdrawal should be performed, in order to optimize therapy and reduce excessive medications. This paper discusses and proposes stepwise, "hit hard", step-up and ICS withdrawal therapeutic approaches for COPD patients based on their GOLD group. We conclude that all approaches have benefits, and only a careful patient selection will determine which approach is better, and which patients will benefit the most from each approach. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/108893 http://hdl.handle.net/10316/108893 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.12.012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/108893 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.12.012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
21735115 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134134421946369 |