Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mascarenhas, José Manuel de
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Barata, Filipe Themudo, Capelo, Sofia
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21481
Resumo: Summary: Usually heritage landscape is seen as a natural and a cultural resource. But, in the base of those landscapes we can meet social practices, an intangible heritage that give cohesion to the natural and cultural aspects. Our scope it's to debate ideas comparing examples. Between the well preserved Chinese rice heritage landscapes, suported by millenary social and farming practices, and the abandonned European terraces, an essential social question emerges: the preservation of the landscape heritage is supported not only by natural and cultural elements but also by social practices, technical knowlegde and ways of understanding Nature. Efforts to the heritage landscape maintenance has been limited to the natural and cultural elements preservation, forgotting often the referred social cohesion factors. To safeguard heritage, the cultural landscape should be duly interpreted which means the understanding of the ecological, social and even economic functionality of the landscape structures. Aim of the presentation: The main aim of the communication is to analyse how the preservation and interpretation of the landscape heritage depend not only on natural and cultural elements but also on the existence of traditional practices and social cohesion. This analysis is accompained with the comparision of existing terrace landscapes from Europe and others. The authors propose a landscape heritage monitoring method through the introduction of new indicators and the development of weighting coeficients strategies. Résumé of your experience in working with or studying interpretation: The authors are studying interpretation of cultural landscapes since the eighties (Project COST G2). They have developed heritage value criteria and monitoring indicators. Some works: Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(1), 2011, pp.5-17; Journal of the Polish Association of Landscape Ecology, 30 (2011), 1-248; Landscapes: Perception, Knowledge, Awareness and Action, 1 (2012), pp.5-18
id RCAP_1ec64d6c33e4825b7695564a3741b0c7
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21481
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?heritage landscapesocial coesionlandscape preservationlandscape interpretationSummary: Usually heritage landscape is seen as a natural and a cultural resource. But, in the base of those landscapes we can meet social practices, an intangible heritage that give cohesion to the natural and cultural aspects. Our scope it's to debate ideas comparing examples. Between the well preserved Chinese rice heritage landscapes, suported by millenary social and farming practices, and the abandonned European terraces, an essential social question emerges: the preservation of the landscape heritage is supported not only by natural and cultural elements but also by social practices, technical knowlegde and ways of understanding Nature. Efforts to the heritage landscape maintenance has been limited to the natural and cultural elements preservation, forgotting often the referred social cohesion factors. To safeguard heritage, the cultural landscape should be duly interpreted which means the understanding of the ecological, social and even economic functionality of the landscape structures. Aim of the presentation: The main aim of the communication is to analyse how the preservation and interpretation of the landscape heritage depend not only on natural and cultural elements but also on the existence of traditional practices and social cohesion. This analysis is accompained with the comparision of existing terrace landscapes from Europe and others. The authors propose a landscape heritage monitoring method through the introduction of new indicators and the development of weighting coeficients strategies. Résumé of your experience in working with or studying interpretation: The authors are studying interpretation of cultural landscapes since the eighties (Project COST G2). They have developed heritage value criteria and monitoring indicators. Some works: Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(1), 2011, pp.5-17; Journal of the Polish Association of Landscape Ecology, 30 (2011), 1-248; Landscapes: Perception, Knowledge, Awareness and Action, 1 (2012), pp.5-18UID/HIS/00057/2013 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007702)European Association for Heritage Interpretation2017-11-28T11:45:41Z2017-11-282013-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/21481http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21481engMASCARENHAS, J.M. de, BARATA, F. Th., CAPELO, S., Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?, International Conference on Heritage Interpretation, Sigtuna, Sweden, 15-18 June 2013.simnaonaoDepartment of Paisagem, Ambiente e Ordenamento, of Évora Universitymascarenhas_jm@sapo.ptfthbarata@gmail.comscapelo@uevora.pt735Mascarenhas, José Manuel deBarata, Filipe ThemudoCapelo, Sofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:12:11Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21481Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:12:46.649976Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
title Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
spellingShingle Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
Mascarenhas, José Manuel de
heritage landscape
social coesion
landscape preservation
landscape interpretation
title_short Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
title_full Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
title_fullStr Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
title_full_unstemmed Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
title_sort Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?
author Mascarenhas, José Manuel de
author_facet Mascarenhas, José Manuel de
Barata, Filipe Themudo
Capelo, Sofia
author_role author
author2 Barata, Filipe Themudo
Capelo, Sofia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mascarenhas, José Manuel de
Barata, Filipe Themudo
Capelo, Sofia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv heritage landscape
social coesion
landscape preservation
landscape interpretation
topic heritage landscape
social coesion
landscape preservation
landscape interpretation
description Summary: Usually heritage landscape is seen as a natural and a cultural resource. But, in the base of those landscapes we can meet social practices, an intangible heritage that give cohesion to the natural and cultural aspects. Our scope it's to debate ideas comparing examples. Between the well preserved Chinese rice heritage landscapes, suported by millenary social and farming practices, and the abandonned European terraces, an essential social question emerges: the preservation of the landscape heritage is supported not only by natural and cultural elements but also by social practices, technical knowlegde and ways of understanding Nature. Efforts to the heritage landscape maintenance has been limited to the natural and cultural elements preservation, forgotting often the referred social cohesion factors. To safeguard heritage, the cultural landscape should be duly interpreted which means the understanding of the ecological, social and even economic functionality of the landscape structures. Aim of the presentation: The main aim of the communication is to analyse how the preservation and interpretation of the landscape heritage depend not only on natural and cultural elements but also on the existence of traditional practices and social cohesion. This analysis is accompained with the comparision of existing terrace landscapes from Europe and others. The authors propose a landscape heritage monitoring method through the introduction of new indicators and the development of weighting coeficients strategies. Résumé of your experience in working with or studying interpretation: The authors are studying interpretation of cultural landscapes since the eighties (Project COST G2). They have developed heritage value criteria and monitoring indicators. Some works: Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(1), 2011, pp.5-17; Journal of the Polish Association of Landscape Ecology, 30 (2011), 1-248; Landscapes: Perception, Knowledge, Awareness and Action, 1 (2012), pp.5-18
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-06-01T00:00:00Z
2017-11-28T11:45:41Z
2017-11-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21481
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21481
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21481
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv MASCARENHAS, J.M. de, BARATA, F. Th., CAPELO, S., Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?, International Conference on Heritage Interpretation, Sigtuna, Sweden, 15-18 June 2013.
sim
nao
nao
Department of Paisagem, Ambiente e Ordenamento, of Évora University
mascarenhas_jm@sapo.pt
fthbarata@gmail.com
scapelo@uevora.pt
735
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Association for Heritage Interpretation
publisher.none.fl_str_mv European Association for Heritage Interpretation
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136609209155584