Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10476 |
Resumo: | Usually heritage landscape is seen as a natural and a cultural resource. But, in the base of those landscapes we can meet social practices, an intangible heritage that give cohesion to the natural and cultural aspects. Our scope it's to debate ideas comparing examples. Between the well preserved Chinese rice heritage landscapes, supported by millenary social and farming practices, and the abandoned European terraces, an essential social question emerges: the preservation of the landscape heritage is supported not only by natural and cultural elements but also by social practices, technical knowledge and ways of understanding Nature. Efforts to the heritage landscape maintenance has been limited to the natural and cultural elements preservation, forgetting often the referred social cohesion factors. To safeguard heritage, the cultural landscape should be duly interpreted which means the understanding of the ecological, social and even economic functionality of the landscape structures. |
id |
RCAP_9bdbb6e5c782a6c779ba33701abaecee |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/10476 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation?Social coesionLandscape perservationLandscape interpretationUsually heritage landscape is seen as a natural and a cultural resource. But, in the base of those landscapes we can meet social practices, an intangible heritage that give cohesion to the natural and cultural aspects. Our scope it's to debate ideas comparing examples. Between the well preserved Chinese rice heritage landscapes, supported by millenary social and farming practices, and the abandoned European terraces, an essential social question emerges: the preservation of the landscape heritage is supported not only by natural and cultural elements but also by social practices, technical knowledge and ways of understanding Nature. Efforts to the heritage landscape maintenance has been limited to the natural and cultural elements preservation, forgetting often the referred social cohesion factors. To safeguard heritage, the cultural landscape should be duly interpreted which means the understanding of the ecological, social and even economic functionality of the landscape structures.UID/HIS/00057/2013 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007702)2014-02-03T15:23:17Z2014-02-032013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/10476http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10476engJosé Manuel de Mascarenhas, Filipe Themudo Barata, Sofia Capelo, Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?, International Conference on Heritage Interpretation, Sigtuna, Sweden,15-18 June 2013.Sigtuna, 15-18 June 2013simnaonaoCIDEHUSmascarenhas_jm@sapo.ptfthbarata@gmail.comscapelo@uevora.pt735de Mascarenhas, José ManuelThemudo Barata, FilipeCapelo, Sofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T18:53:26Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/10476Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:04:22.942110Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
title |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
spellingShingle |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? de Mascarenhas, José Manuel Social coesion Landscape perservation Landscape interpretation |
title_short |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
title_full |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
title_fullStr |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
title_sort |
Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape perservation and interpretation? |
author |
de Mascarenhas, José Manuel |
author_facet |
de Mascarenhas, José Manuel Themudo Barata, Filipe Capelo, Sofia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Themudo Barata, Filipe Capelo, Sofia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Mascarenhas, José Manuel Themudo Barata, Filipe Capelo, Sofia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social coesion Landscape perservation Landscape interpretation |
topic |
Social coesion Landscape perservation Landscape interpretation |
description |
Usually heritage landscape is seen as a natural and a cultural resource. But, in the base of those landscapes we can meet social practices, an intangible heritage that give cohesion to the natural and cultural aspects. Our scope it's to debate ideas comparing examples. Between the well preserved Chinese rice heritage landscapes, supported by millenary social and farming practices, and the abandoned European terraces, an essential social question emerges: the preservation of the landscape heritage is supported not only by natural and cultural elements but also by social practices, technical knowledge and ways of understanding Nature. Efforts to the heritage landscape maintenance has been limited to the natural and cultural elements preservation, forgetting often the referred social cohesion factors. To safeguard heritage, the cultural landscape should be duly interpreted which means the understanding of the ecological, social and even economic functionality of the landscape structures. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z 2014-02-03T15:23:17Z 2014-02-03 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10476 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10476 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/10476 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
José Manuel de Mascarenhas, Filipe Themudo Barata, Sofia Capelo, Is social coesion affecting heritage landscape preservation and interpretation?, International Conference on Heritage Interpretation, Sigtuna, Sweden,15-18 June 2013. Sigtuna, 15-18 June 2013 sim nao nao CIDEHUS mascarenhas_jm@sapo.pt fthbarata@gmail.com scapelo@uevora.pt 735 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136527959195648 |