Ethics in transnational forensic DNA data exchange in the EU: constructing boundaries and managing controversies

• Autor(a) principal: Machado, Helena
• Data de Publicação: 2018
• Outros Autores: Granja, Rafaela Patrícia Gonçalves
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/55781
• topic: Prüm; Ethics; Sociality of science; Boundary work; Controversies; Prum; Ciências Sociais::Sociologia; Social Sciences; Arts & Humanities

Under EU Law, Member States are compelled to engage in reciprocal automated forensic DNA profile exchange for stepping up on cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime. The ethical implications of this transnational DNA data exchange are paramount. Exploring what the concept of ethics means to forensic practitioners actively involved in transnational DNA data exchange allows discussing how ethics can be addressed as embedded in the sociality of science and in the way scientific work is legitimated. The narratives of forensic practitioners juxtapose the construction of fluid ethical boundary work between science and non-science with the dynamic management of controversies, both of which are seen as ways to lend legitimacy and objectivity to scientific work. Ethical boundary work involves diverse fluid forms: as a boundary between science/ethics, science/criminal justice system, and good and bad science. The management of controversies occurs in three interrelated ways. First, through a continuous process of reconstructing delegations of responsibility in dealing with uncertainty surrounding the reliability of DNA evidence. Second, threats to the protection of data are portrayed as being resolved by black- boxing privacy. Finally, controversies related to social accountability and transparency are negotiated through the lens of opening science to the public.