Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gupta, Sahil
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Palmer, Scott, Ferreira-Dos-santos, Guilherme, Hurdle, Mark Friedrich
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/120542
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites in the United States of America. Methods: We obtained a list of accredited 104 Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Electronic Residency Application Service. Individual Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were then evaluated on 14 different criteria. We grouped fellowship programs based on census region and Electronic Residency Application Service participation status, and analyzed the differences using nonpara-metric statistics. Results: A total of 104 accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were evaluated for a total of 14 different criteria. Of the 14 different criteria, an average of 3.94 were described in each website. Number of Fellowship positions per year (71.8%), clinical rotations during the program (65.1%), and faculty background (62.2%) were the most frequently described features on the websites. Night call responsibilities (3.9%), meal allowance (7.8%) and parking availability (10.7%) were the least described features in the websites. There were no significant differences between program websites when grouped by census regions or the participation status in the Electronic Residency Applications Service. Conclusion: The content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites is extremely variable across the United States of America. This study indicates that there is room for improvement and enhancement of the comprehensiveness of website content for the majority of the programs analyzed. Additionally, this study also emphasizes the importance of having accurate and easily available online information in a post-pandemic era, when prospective fellows evaluate programs online through their websites.
id RCAP_21cd5c9b18cb78e1217b2bf864f59caf
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/120542
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteriaACGMEApplicationERASFellowship programPain medicineWebsiteAnesthesiology and Pain MedicineObjective: To evaluate the content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites in the United States of America. Methods: We obtained a list of accredited 104 Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Electronic Residency Application Service. Individual Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were then evaluated on 14 different criteria. We grouped fellowship programs based on census region and Electronic Residency Application Service participation status, and analyzed the differences using nonpara-metric statistics. Results: A total of 104 accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were evaluated for a total of 14 different criteria. Of the 14 different criteria, an average of 3.94 were described in each website. Number of Fellowship positions per year (71.8%), clinical rotations during the program (65.1%), and faculty background (62.2%) were the most frequently described features on the websites. Night call responsibilities (3.9%), meal allowance (7.8%) and parking availability (10.7%) were the least described features in the websites. There were no significant differences between program websites when grouped by census regions or the participation status in the Electronic Residency Applications Service. Conclusion: The content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites is extremely variable across the United States of America. This study indicates that there is room for improvement and enhancement of the comprehensiveness of website content for the majority of the programs analyzed. Additionally, this study also emphasizes the importance of having accurate and easily available online information in a post-pandemic era, when prospective fellows evaluate programs online through their websites.NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)RUNGupta, SahilPalmer, ScottFerreira-Dos-santos, GuilhermeHurdle, Mark Friedrich2021-07-05T22:18:16Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article5application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/120542eng1178-7090PURE: 32100629https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S313513info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T05:03:03Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/120542Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:44:22.710307Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
title Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
spellingShingle Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
Gupta, Sahil
ACGME
Application
ERAS
Fellowship program
Pain medicine
Website
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
title_short Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
title_full Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
title_fullStr Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
title_full_unstemmed Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
title_sort Pain medicine fellowship program websites in the United States of America – A nonparametric statistic analysis of 14 different criteria
author Gupta, Sahil
author_facet Gupta, Sahil
Palmer, Scott
Ferreira-Dos-santos, Guilherme
Hurdle, Mark Friedrich
author_role author
author2 Palmer, Scott
Ferreira-Dos-santos, Guilherme
Hurdle, Mark Friedrich
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOVA Medical School|Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (NMS|FCM)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gupta, Sahil
Palmer, Scott
Ferreira-Dos-santos, Guilherme
Hurdle, Mark Friedrich
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ACGME
Application
ERAS
Fellowship program
Pain medicine
Website
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
topic ACGME
Application
ERAS
Fellowship program
Pain medicine
Website
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
description Objective: To evaluate the content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites in the United States of America. Methods: We obtained a list of accredited 104 Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Electronic Residency Application Service. Individual Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were then evaluated on 14 different criteria. We grouped fellowship programs based on census region and Electronic Residency Application Service participation status, and analyzed the differences using nonpara-metric statistics. Results: A total of 104 accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were evaluated for a total of 14 different criteria. Of the 14 different criteria, an average of 3.94 were described in each website. Number of Fellowship positions per year (71.8%), clinical rotations during the program (65.1%), and faculty background (62.2%) were the most frequently described features on the websites. Night call responsibilities (3.9%), meal allowance (7.8%) and parking availability (10.7%) were the least described features in the websites. There were no significant differences between program websites when grouped by census regions or the participation status in the Electronic Residency Applications Service. Conclusion: The content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites is extremely variable across the United States of America. This study indicates that there is room for improvement and enhancement of the comprehensiveness of website content for the majority of the programs analyzed. Additionally, this study also emphasizes the importance of having accurate and easily available online information in a post-pandemic era, when prospective fellows evaluate programs online through their websites.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-05T22:18:16Z
2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/120542
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/120542
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1178-7090
PURE: 32100629
https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S313513
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 5
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138051564240896