Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castaldo, Antonino
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: VERZICHELLI, LUCA
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45692
Resumo: Notwithstanding the speculations from the literature, the empirical analyses still neglect the convergence between populism and technocracy. The Italian case can be of some interest in this perspective, given the rise of technocratic populism since Silvio Berlusconi’s rise to power in 1994. By analyzing the style of leadership and the processes of ministerial appointment and delegation, we argue that Berlusconi has been a trendsetter, more than a coherent example of technocratic populist leader. On the one hand, he played the role of the entrepreneur in politics, promising to run the state as a firm. Moreover, he adopted an anti-establishment appeal, delegitimizing political opponents and stressing the divide between ‘us’ (hardworking ordinary people) and ‘them’ (incompetent politicians). On the other hand, however, his anti-elite approach was mainly directed towards the ‘post-communist elite.’ Extending the analysis to the following two decades, we introduce a diachronic comparison involving three examples of leadership somehow influenced by Berlusconi. Mario Monti represents the paradox of the impossible hero: A pure technocrat unable to take a genuinely populist semblance. Matteo Renzi represents the attempt to mix a populist party leadership with a technocratic chief executive style. Finally, Salvini represents the pure nativist heir of Berlusconi, as the new leader of the right-wing camp. The latest developments of executive leadership in Italy, and the re-emergence of other residual hints of technocratic populism, will be discussed in the final section of the article, also in the light of the evident impact of the 2020 pandemic outbreak on the practices of government.
id RCAP_23278c5dc257712fa62458302afb94ff
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/45692
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his DisciplesBerlusconiConteItalyleadershipMontipopulismRenziSalvinitechnocratic populismNotwithstanding the speculations from the literature, the empirical analyses still neglect the convergence between populism and technocracy. The Italian case can be of some interest in this perspective, given the rise of technocratic populism since Silvio Berlusconi’s rise to power in 1994. By analyzing the style of leadership and the processes of ministerial appointment and delegation, we argue that Berlusconi has been a trendsetter, more than a coherent example of technocratic populist leader. On the one hand, he played the role of the entrepreneur in politics, promising to run the state as a firm. Moreover, he adopted an anti-establishment appeal, delegitimizing political opponents and stressing the divide between ‘us’ (hardworking ordinary people) and ‘them’ (incompetent politicians). On the other hand, however, his anti-elite approach was mainly directed towards the ‘post-communist elite.’ Extending the analysis to the following two decades, we introduce a diachronic comparison involving three examples of leadership somehow influenced by Berlusconi. Mario Monti represents the paradox of the impossible hero: A pure technocrat unable to take a genuinely populist semblance. Matteo Renzi represents the attempt to mix a populist party leadership with a technocratic chief executive style. Finally, Salvini represents the pure nativist heir of Berlusconi, as the new leader of the right-wing camp. The latest developments of executive leadership in Italy, and the re-emergence of other residual hints of technocratic populism, will be discussed in the final section of the article, also in the light of the evident impact of the 2020 pandemic outbreak on the practices of government.CogitatoRepositório da Universidade de LisboaCastaldo, AntoninoVERZICHELLI, LUCA2021-01-07T15:19:22Z2020-12-172020-12-17T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/45692engCastaldo, A., & Verzichelli, L. (2020). Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 485-495. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.334810.17645/pag.v8i4.3348info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T16:47:16Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/45692Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:57:52.002479Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
title Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
spellingShingle Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
Castaldo, Antonino
Berlusconi
Conte
Italy
leadership
Monti
populism
Renzi
Salvini
technocratic populism
title_short Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
title_full Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
title_fullStr Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
title_full_unstemmed Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
title_sort Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples
author Castaldo, Antonino
author_facet Castaldo, Antonino
VERZICHELLI, LUCA
author_role author
author2 VERZICHELLI, LUCA
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castaldo, Antonino
VERZICHELLI, LUCA
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Berlusconi
Conte
Italy
leadership
Monti
populism
Renzi
Salvini
technocratic populism
topic Berlusconi
Conte
Italy
leadership
Monti
populism
Renzi
Salvini
technocratic populism
description Notwithstanding the speculations from the literature, the empirical analyses still neglect the convergence between populism and technocracy. The Italian case can be of some interest in this perspective, given the rise of technocratic populism since Silvio Berlusconi’s rise to power in 1994. By analyzing the style of leadership and the processes of ministerial appointment and delegation, we argue that Berlusconi has been a trendsetter, more than a coherent example of technocratic populist leader. On the one hand, he played the role of the entrepreneur in politics, promising to run the state as a firm. Moreover, he adopted an anti-establishment appeal, delegitimizing political opponents and stressing the divide between ‘us’ (hardworking ordinary people) and ‘them’ (incompetent politicians). On the other hand, however, his anti-elite approach was mainly directed towards the ‘post-communist elite.’ Extending the analysis to the following two decades, we introduce a diachronic comparison involving three examples of leadership somehow influenced by Berlusconi. Mario Monti represents the paradox of the impossible hero: A pure technocrat unable to take a genuinely populist semblance. Matteo Renzi represents the attempt to mix a populist party leadership with a technocratic chief executive style. Finally, Salvini represents the pure nativist heir of Berlusconi, as the new leader of the right-wing camp. The latest developments of executive leadership in Italy, and the re-emergence of other residual hints of technocratic populism, will be discussed in the final section of the article, also in the light of the evident impact of the 2020 pandemic outbreak on the practices of government.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-17
2020-12-17T00:00:00Z
2021-01-07T15:19:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45692
url http://hdl.handle.net/10451/45692
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Castaldo, A., & Verzichelli, L. (2020). Technocratic Populism in Italy after Berlusconi: The Trendsetter and his Disciples. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 485-495. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3348
10.17645/pag.v8i4.3348
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitato
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitato
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134523495022592