Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa, Natacha
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Tavares, Sérgio, Carbas, Ricardo, Simoes, Ricardo, Magalhães, F., Marques, António
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11110/1982
Resumo: Background It has been difficult to improve the intramedullary nail technique because of the lack of consistency in the procedures used to evaluate the bone-implant stiffness. Objective The goal of this study was to develop a simple methodology for determining the stiffness of a bone implant that considers the physiological loads and bone orientation, and allows a finite element analysis and its validation using mechanical experimentation. Methods Finite element models for a composite tibia before and after an intramedullary nail was implanted were created and validated using the results of a set of mechanical experiments, in which the stiffness values of the model were measured and compared under axial compression, 4-point bending, shear, and torsional loads considering the patient’s condition in the early healing phase. Grips with personalized bone interfaces were developed to guarantee the physiological loads and bone orientation. Results In the 4-point bending, torsional, and shear loading modes, the developed bone-implant finite element model showed a satisfactory level of predictive potential in relation to the experimental observations, with a percentage variation of less than 35%. This study also demonstrated that despite the high stiffness of the bone-implant construct, motion was always generated at the interfragmentary site during the early healing phase. In addition, during this stage, the nail supported most of the load applied to the lower limb (up to 85%). Conclusions This strategy could contribute to the future determination of the ideal mechanical environment at a fracture site and how this environment evolves throughout the healing process.
id RCAP_252077804ab534205a0616f393daa28d
oai_identifier_str oai:ciencipca.ipca.pt:11110/1982
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness EvaluationMechanical experimentationBackground It has been difficult to improve the intramedullary nail technique because of the lack of consistency in the procedures used to evaluate the bone-implant stiffness. Objective The goal of this study was to develop a simple methodology for determining the stiffness of a bone implant that considers the physiological loads and bone orientation, and allows a finite element analysis and its validation using mechanical experimentation. Methods Finite element models for a composite tibia before and after an intramedullary nail was implanted were created and validated using the results of a set of mechanical experiments, in which the stiffness values of the model were measured and compared under axial compression, 4-point bending, shear, and torsional loads considering the patient’s condition in the early healing phase. Grips with personalized bone interfaces were developed to guarantee the physiological loads and bone orientation. Results In the 4-point bending, torsional, and shear loading modes, the developed bone-implant finite element model showed a satisfactory level of predictive potential in relation to the experimental observations, with a percentage variation of less than 35%. This study also demonstrated that despite the high stiffness of the bone-implant construct, motion was always generated at the interfragmentary site during the early healing phase. In addition, during this stage, the nail supported most of the load applied to the lower limb (up to 85%). Conclusions This strategy could contribute to the future determination of the ideal mechanical environment at a fracture site and how this environment evolves throughout the healing process.Experimental Mechanics2020-10-06T10:35:42Z2020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/11110/1982oai:ciencipca.ipca.pt:11110/1982enghttps://doi.org/Rosa, N., Tavares, S.M.O., Carbas, R.J.C. et al. Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation. Exp Mech (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00654-w0014-4851http://hdl.handle.net/11110/1982metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRosa, NatachaTavares, SérgioCarbas, RicardoSimoes, RicardoMagalhães, F.Marques, Antónioreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T12:53:18Zoai:ciencipca.ipca.pt:11110/1982Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:02:15.906242Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
title Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
spellingShingle Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
Rosa, Natacha
Mechanical experimentation
title_short Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
title_full Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
title_fullStr Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
title_sort Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation
author Rosa, Natacha
author_facet Rosa, Natacha
Tavares, Sérgio
Carbas, Ricardo
Simoes, Ricardo
Magalhães, F.
Marques, António
author_role author
author2 Tavares, Sérgio
Carbas, Ricardo
Simoes, Ricardo
Magalhães, F.
Marques, António
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa, Natacha
Tavares, Sérgio
Carbas, Ricardo
Simoes, Ricardo
Magalhães, F.
Marques, António
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mechanical experimentation
topic Mechanical experimentation
description Background It has been difficult to improve the intramedullary nail technique because of the lack of consistency in the procedures used to evaluate the bone-implant stiffness. Objective The goal of this study was to develop a simple methodology for determining the stiffness of a bone implant that considers the physiological loads and bone orientation, and allows a finite element analysis and its validation using mechanical experimentation. Methods Finite element models for a composite tibia before and after an intramedullary nail was implanted were created and validated using the results of a set of mechanical experiments, in which the stiffness values of the model were measured and compared under axial compression, 4-point bending, shear, and torsional loads considering the patient’s condition in the early healing phase. Grips with personalized bone interfaces were developed to guarantee the physiological loads and bone orientation. Results In the 4-point bending, torsional, and shear loading modes, the developed bone-implant finite element model showed a satisfactory level of predictive potential in relation to the experimental observations, with a percentage variation of less than 35%. This study also demonstrated that despite the high stiffness of the bone-implant construct, motion was always generated at the interfragmentary site during the early healing phase. In addition, during this stage, the nail supported most of the load applied to the lower limb (up to 85%). Conclusions This strategy could contribute to the future determination of the ideal mechanical environment at a fracture site and how this environment evolves throughout the healing process.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-06T10:35:42Z
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11110/1982
oai:ciencipca.ipca.pt:11110/1982
url http://hdl.handle.net/11110/1982
identifier_str_mv oai:ciencipca.ipca.pt:11110/1982
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/Rosa, N., Tavares, S.M.O., Carbas, R.J.C. et al. Methodology for Bone–Implant Stiffness Evaluation. Exp Mech (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-020-00654-w
0014-4851
http://hdl.handle.net/11110/1982
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv metadata only access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv metadata only access
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Experimental Mechanics
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Experimental Mechanics
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799129893222481920