Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4-77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9-77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5-66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3-68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04-17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24-18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22-22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption. |
id |
RCAP_272ee37b231b0b5f8d82b487b833c6d7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2006 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?Helicobacter pyloriFarmacoterapia CombinadaClaritromicinaAmoxicilinaLevofloxacinaInfecções por HelicobacterProspective StudiesProton Pump InhibitorsTreatment FailureYoung AdultHelicobacter pyloriBACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4-77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9-77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5-66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3-68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04-17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24-18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22-22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.RIHUCAlmeida, NDonato, MMRomãozinho, JMLuxo, CCardoso, OCipriano, MAMarinho, CFernandes, ACalhau, CSofia, C2016-12-15T14:55:24Z2015-02-152015-02-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006engBMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 15;15:23.10.1186/s12876-015-0245-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:23:18Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:04:26.898763Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
title |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
spellingShingle |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? Almeida, N Helicobacter pylori Farmacoterapia Combinada Claritromicina Amoxicilina Levofloxacina Infecções por Helicobacter Prospective Studies Proton Pump Inhibitors Treatment Failure Young Adult Helicobacter pylori |
title_short |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
title_full |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
title_fullStr |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
title_sort |
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? |
author |
Almeida, N |
author_facet |
Almeida, N Donato, MM Romãozinho, JM Luxo, C Cardoso, O Cipriano, MA Marinho, C Fernandes, A Calhau, C Sofia, C |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Donato, MM Romãozinho, JM Luxo, C Cardoso, O Cipriano, MA Marinho, C Fernandes, A Calhau, C Sofia, C |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
RIHUC |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Almeida, N Donato, MM Romãozinho, JM Luxo, C Cardoso, O Cipriano, MA Marinho, C Fernandes, A Calhau, C Sofia, C |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Helicobacter pylori Farmacoterapia Combinada Claritromicina Amoxicilina Levofloxacina Infecções por Helicobacter Prospective Studies Proton Pump Inhibitors Treatment Failure Young Adult Helicobacter pylori |
topic |
Helicobacter pylori Farmacoterapia Combinada Claritromicina Amoxicilina Levofloxacina Infecções por Helicobacter Prospective Studies Proton Pump Inhibitors Treatment Failure Young Adult Helicobacter pylori |
description |
BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4-77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9-77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5-66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3-68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04-17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24-18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22-22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-02-15 2015-02-15T00:00:00Z 2016-12-15T14:55:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 15;15:23. 10.1186/s12876-015-0245-y |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131706873085952 |