Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, N
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Donato, MM, Romãozinho, JM, Luxo, C, Cardoso, O, Cipriano, MA, Marinho, C, Fernandes, A, Calhau, C, Sofia, C
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4-77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9-77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5-66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3-68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04-17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24-18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22-22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.
id RCAP_272ee37b231b0b5f8d82b487b833c6d7
oai_identifier_str oai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2006
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?Helicobacter pyloriFarmacoterapia CombinadaClaritromicinaAmoxicilinaLevofloxacinaInfecções por HelicobacterProspective StudiesProton Pump InhibitorsTreatment FailureYoung AdultHelicobacter pyloriBACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4-77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9-77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5-66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3-68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04-17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24-18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22-22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.RIHUCAlmeida, NDonato, MMRomãozinho, JMLuxo, CCardoso, OCipriano, MAMarinho, CFernandes, ACalhau, CSofia, C2016-12-15T14:55:24Z2015-02-152015-02-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006engBMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 15;15:23.10.1186/s12876-015-0245-yinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-11T14:23:18Zoai:rihuc.huc.min-saude.pt:10400.4/2006Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:04:26.898763Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
spellingShingle Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
Almeida, N
Helicobacter pylori
Farmacoterapia Combinada
Claritromicina
Amoxicilina
Levofloxacina
Infecções por Helicobacter
Prospective Studies
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Treatment Failure
Young Adult
Helicobacter pylori
title_short Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_full Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_fullStr Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_sort Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
author Almeida, N
author_facet Almeida, N
Donato, MM
Romãozinho, JM
Luxo, C
Cardoso, O
Cipriano, MA
Marinho, C
Fernandes, A
Calhau, C
Sofia, C
author_role author
author2 Donato, MM
Romãozinho, JM
Luxo, C
Cardoso, O
Cipriano, MA
Marinho, C
Fernandes, A
Calhau, C
Sofia, C
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv RIHUC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, N
Donato, MM
Romãozinho, JM
Luxo, C
Cardoso, O
Cipriano, MA
Marinho, C
Fernandes, A
Calhau, C
Sofia, C
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Helicobacter pylori
Farmacoterapia Combinada
Claritromicina
Amoxicilina
Levofloxacina
Infecções por Helicobacter
Prospective Studies
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Treatment Failure
Young Adult
Helicobacter pylori
topic Helicobacter pylori
Farmacoterapia Combinada
Claritromicina
Amoxicilina
Levofloxacina
Infecções por Helicobacter
Prospective Studies
Proton Pump Inhibitors
Treatment Failure
Young Adult
Helicobacter pylori
description BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6-10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4-77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9-77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5-66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3-68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04-17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24-18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22-22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-15
2015-02-15T00:00:00Z
2016-12-15T14:55:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.4/2006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 15;15:23.
10.1186/s12876-015-0245-y
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131706873085952