Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356 |
Resumo: | Predictable outcomes intended by the application of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) derivative membranes have created a lack of consideration for their consistency and functional integrity. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties through tensile strength and analyze the structural organization among the membranes produced by L-PRF (leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin), A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin), and A-PRF+ (advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus) (original protocols) that varied in centrifugation speed and time. L-PRF (n = 12), A-PRF (n = 19), and A-PRF+ (n = 13) membranes were submitted to a traction test, evaluating the maximum and average traction. For maximum traction, 0.0020, 0.0022, and 0.0010 N·mm−2 were obtained for A-PRF, A-PRF+, and L-PRF, respectively; regarding the average resistance to traction, 0.0012, 0.0015, and 0.006 N·mm−2 were obtained, respectively (A-PRF+ > A-PRF > L-PRF). For all groups studied, significant results were found. In the surface morphology observations through SEM, the L-PRF matrix showed a highly compact surface with thick fibers present within interfibrous areas with the apparent destruction of red blood cells and leukocytes. The A-PRF protocol showed a dense matrix composed of thin and elongated fibers that seemed to follow a preferential and orientated direction in which the platelets were well-adhered. Porosity was also evident with a large diameter of the interfibrous spaces whereas A-PRF+ was the most porous platelet concentrate with the greatest fiber abundance and cell preservation. Thus, this study concluded that A-PRF+ produced membranes with significant and higher maximum traction results, indicating a better viscoelastic strength when stretched by two opposing forces. |
id |
RCAP_2a3e65b7a4886a03db7f7fa8b48703fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/37356 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluationPlatelet-rich fibrinTensile strengthResistanceRuptureFibrinMicroscopic analysisCentrifugationPredictable outcomes intended by the application of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) derivative membranes have created a lack of consideration for their consistency and functional integrity. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties through tensile strength and analyze the structural organization among the membranes produced by L-PRF (leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin), A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin), and A-PRF+ (advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus) (original protocols) that varied in centrifugation speed and time. L-PRF (n = 12), A-PRF (n = 19), and A-PRF+ (n = 13) membranes were submitted to a traction test, evaluating the maximum and average traction. For maximum traction, 0.0020, 0.0022, and 0.0010 N·mm−2 were obtained for A-PRF, A-PRF+, and L-PRF, respectively; regarding the average resistance to traction, 0.0012, 0.0015, and 0.006 N·mm−2 were obtained, respectively (A-PRF+ > A-PRF > L-PRF). For all groups studied, significant results were found. In the surface morphology observations through SEM, the L-PRF matrix showed a highly compact surface with thick fibers present within interfibrous areas with the apparent destruction of red blood cells and leukocytes. The A-PRF protocol showed a dense matrix composed of thin and elongated fibers that seemed to follow a preferential and orientated direction in which the platelets were well-adhered. Porosity was also evident with a large diameter of the interfibrous spaces whereas A-PRF+ was the most porous platelet concentrate with the greatest fiber abundance and cell preservation. Thus, this study concluded that A-PRF+ produced membranes with significant and higher maximum traction results, indicating a better viscoelastic strength when stretched by two opposing forces.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaSimões-Pedro, MaraTróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S.Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dosCompleto, António M. G.Castilho, Rogerio MoraesFernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira2022-04-22T16:54:12Z2022-042022-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356eng2073-436010.3390/polym1407139285128263500PMC900253335406263000781467800001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-16T01:43:38Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/37356Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:30:25.826332Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
title |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
spellingShingle |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation Simões-Pedro, Mara Platelet-rich fibrin Tensile strength Resistance Rupture Fibrin Microscopic analysis Centrifugation |
title_short |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
title_full |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
title_sort |
Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation |
author |
Simões-Pedro, Mara |
author_facet |
Simões-Pedro, Mara Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S. Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos Completo, António M. G. Castilho, Rogerio Moraes Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S. Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos Completo, António M. G. Castilho, Rogerio Moraes Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Simões-Pedro, Mara Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S. Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos Completo, António M. G. Castilho, Rogerio Moraes Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Platelet-rich fibrin Tensile strength Resistance Rupture Fibrin Microscopic analysis Centrifugation |
topic |
Platelet-rich fibrin Tensile strength Resistance Rupture Fibrin Microscopic analysis Centrifugation |
description |
Predictable outcomes intended by the application of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) derivative membranes have created a lack of consideration for their consistency and functional integrity. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties through tensile strength and analyze the structural organization among the membranes produced by L-PRF (leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin), A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin), and A-PRF+ (advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus) (original protocols) that varied in centrifugation speed and time. L-PRF (n = 12), A-PRF (n = 19), and A-PRF+ (n = 13) membranes were submitted to a traction test, evaluating the maximum and average traction. For maximum traction, 0.0020, 0.0022, and 0.0010 N·mm−2 were obtained for A-PRF, A-PRF+, and L-PRF, respectively; regarding the average resistance to traction, 0.0012, 0.0015, and 0.006 N·mm−2 were obtained, respectively (A-PRF+ > A-PRF > L-PRF). For all groups studied, significant results were found. In the surface morphology observations through SEM, the L-PRF matrix showed a highly compact surface with thick fibers present within interfibrous areas with the apparent destruction of red blood cells and leukocytes. The A-PRF protocol showed a dense matrix composed of thin and elongated fibers that seemed to follow a preferential and orientated direction in which the platelets were well-adhered. Porosity was also evident with a large diameter of the interfibrous spaces whereas A-PRF+ was the most porous platelet concentrate with the greatest fiber abundance and cell preservation. Thus, this study concluded that A-PRF+ produced membranes with significant and higher maximum traction results, indicating a better viscoelastic strength when stretched by two opposing forces. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-22T16:54:12Z 2022-04 2022-04-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2073-4360 10.3390/polym14071392 85128263500 PMC9002533 35406263 000781467800001 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132025822642176 |