Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Simões-Pedro, Mara
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S., Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos, Completo, António M. G., Castilho, Rogerio Moraes, Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356
Resumo: Predictable outcomes intended by the application of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) derivative membranes have created a lack of consideration for their consistency and functional integrity. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties through tensile strength and analyze the structural organization among the membranes produced by L-PRF (leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin), A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin), and A-PRF+ (advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus) (original protocols) that varied in centrifugation speed and time. L-PRF (n = 12), A-PRF (n = 19), and A-PRF+ (n = 13) membranes were submitted to a traction test, evaluating the maximum and average traction. For maximum traction, 0.0020, 0.0022, and 0.0010 N·mm−2 were obtained for A-PRF, A-PRF+, and L-PRF, respectively; regarding the average resistance to traction, 0.0012, 0.0015, and 0.006 N·mm−2 were obtained, respectively (A-PRF+ > A-PRF > L-PRF). For all groups studied, significant results were found. In the surface morphology observations through SEM, the L-PRF matrix showed a highly compact surface with thick fibers present within interfibrous areas with the apparent destruction of red blood cells and leukocytes. The A-PRF protocol showed a dense matrix composed of thin and elongated fibers that seemed to follow a preferential and orientated direction in which the platelets were well-adhered. Porosity was also evident with a large diameter of the interfibrous spaces whereas A-PRF+ was the most porous platelet concentrate with the greatest fiber abundance and cell preservation. Thus, this study concluded that A-PRF+ produced membranes with significant and higher maximum traction results, indicating a better viscoelastic strength when stretched by two opposing forces.
id RCAP_2a3e65b7a4886a03db7f7fa8b48703fd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/37356
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluationPlatelet-rich fibrinTensile strengthResistanceRuptureFibrinMicroscopic analysisCentrifugationPredictable outcomes intended by the application of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) derivative membranes have created a lack of consideration for their consistency and functional integrity. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties through tensile strength and analyze the structural organization among the membranes produced by L-PRF (leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin), A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin), and A-PRF+ (advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus) (original protocols) that varied in centrifugation speed and time. L-PRF (n = 12), A-PRF (n = 19), and A-PRF+ (n = 13) membranes were submitted to a traction test, evaluating the maximum and average traction. For maximum traction, 0.0020, 0.0022, and 0.0010 N·mm−2 were obtained for A-PRF, A-PRF+, and L-PRF, respectively; regarding the average resistance to traction, 0.0012, 0.0015, and 0.006 N·mm−2 were obtained, respectively (A-PRF+ > A-PRF > L-PRF). For all groups studied, significant results were found. In the surface morphology observations through SEM, the L-PRF matrix showed a highly compact surface with thick fibers present within interfibrous areas with the apparent destruction of red blood cells and leukocytes. The A-PRF protocol showed a dense matrix composed of thin and elongated fibers that seemed to follow a preferential and orientated direction in which the platelets were well-adhered. Porosity was also evident with a large diameter of the interfibrous spaces whereas A-PRF+ was the most porous platelet concentrate with the greatest fiber abundance and cell preservation. Thus, this study concluded that A-PRF+ produced membranes with significant and higher maximum traction results, indicating a better viscoelastic strength when stretched by two opposing forces.Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaSimões-Pedro, MaraTróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S.Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dosCompleto, António M. G.Castilho, Rogerio MoraesFernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira2022-04-22T16:54:12Z2022-042022-04-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356eng2073-436010.3390/polym1407139285128263500PMC900253335406263000781467800001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-16T01:43:38Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/37356Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:30:25.826332Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
title Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
spellingShingle Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
Simões-Pedro, Mara
Platelet-rich fibrin
Tensile strength
Resistance
Rupture
Fibrin
Microscopic analysis
Centrifugation
title_short Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
title_full Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
title_fullStr Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
title_sort Tensile strength essay comparing three different platelet-rich fibrin membranes (L-PRF, A-PRF, and A-PRF plus): a mechanical and structural in vitro evaluation
author Simões-Pedro, Mara
author_facet Simões-Pedro, Mara
Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S.
Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos
Completo, António M. G.
Castilho, Rogerio Moraes
Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S.
Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos
Completo, António M. G.
Castilho, Rogerio Moraes
Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simões-Pedro, Mara
Tróia, Pedro Maria B. P. S.
Santos, Nuno Bernardo Malta dos
Completo, António M. G.
Castilho, Rogerio Moraes
Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Platelet-rich fibrin
Tensile strength
Resistance
Rupture
Fibrin
Microscopic analysis
Centrifugation
topic Platelet-rich fibrin
Tensile strength
Resistance
Rupture
Fibrin
Microscopic analysis
Centrifugation
description Predictable outcomes intended by the application of PRF (platelet-rich fibrin) derivative membranes have created a lack of consideration for their consistency and functional integrity. This study aimed to compare the mechanical properties through tensile strength and analyze the structural organization among the membranes produced by L-PRF (leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin), A-PRF (advanced platelet-rich fibrin), and A-PRF+ (advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus) (original protocols) that varied in centrifugation speed and time. L-PRF (n = 12), A-PRF (n = 19), and A-PRF+ (n = 13) membranes were submitted to a traction test, evaluating the maximum and average traction. For maximum traction, 0.0020, 0.0022, and 0.0010 N·mm−2 were obtained for A-PRF, A-PRF+, and L-PRF, respectively; regarding the average resistance to traction, 0.0012, 0.0015, and 0.006 N·mm−2 were obtained, respectively (A-PRF+ > A-PRF > L-PRF). For all groups studied, significant results were found. In the surface morphology observations through SEM, the L-PRF matrix showed a highly compact surface with thick fibers present within interfibrous areas with the apparent destruction of red blood cells and leukocytes. The A-PRF protocol showed a dense matrix composed of thin and elongated fibers that seemed to follow a preferential and orientated direction in which the platelets were well-adhered. Porosity was also evident with a large diameter of the interfibrous spaces whereas A-PRF+ was the most porous platelet concentrate with the greatest fiber abundance and cell preservation. Thus, this study concluded that A-PRF+ produced membranes with significant and higher maximum traction results, indicating a better viscoelastic strength when stretched by two opposing forces.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-22T16:54:12Z
2022-04
2022-04-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/37356
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2073-4360
10.3390/polym14071392
85128263500
PMC9002533
35406263
000781467800001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132025822642176