Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bernardo, Isabel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vieira, Rui Marques, de Sá, Alexandre Franco
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v13i3.25536
Resumo: Based on the analysis of empirical situations, we intend to discuss the following question: “How can digital technologies support the systemic introduction of a formative dimension of evaluation to enhance learning in Philosophy?”. The analysis of this issue will take as its starting point the current legal framework of curricular autonomy and flexibility and international guidelines such as those of the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators and will be carried out in a double dimension. The first dimension is pedagogical and seeks to reflect on the importance of the formative dimension of assessment, in what is meant by “assessment for learning”. The second dimension is methodological, and it discusses how the design of activities in class, by including digital technologies, can enhance the learning of the skills of philosophizing. The empirical accomplishment of this second dimension will be done through the description and analysis of two empirical excerpts implemented in the academic year 2019-2020 by the author of this article, with a class of 21 students from 10th grade in the science and technology course at a school in the Center Of Portugal. Feedback and formative assessment were systematically introduced in conceptualization and argumentation exercises, developed by students in sequences of activity. The evaluated products were texts and graphic representations of arguments, developed using Google Drive digital technologies. A final balance will highlight the gains achieved. Some constraints to a possible extension of these pedagogical processes to a more generalized practice of Philosophy teachers will also be mentioned.
id RCAP_2a782a2acf36d74b8823a2ecaaa84a58
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/25536
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in PortugalAvaliação para as aprendizagens: tecnologias digitais para a avaliação na aula de Filosofia do ensino secundário em PortugalBased on the analysis of empirical situations, we intend to discuss the following question: “How can digital technologies support the systemic introduction of a formative dimension of evaluation to enhance learning in Philosophy?”. The analysis of this issue will take as its starting point the current legal framework of curricular autonomy and flexibility and international guidelines such as those of the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators and will be carried out in a double dimension. The first dimension is pedagogical and seeks to reflect on the importance of the formative dimension of assessment, in what is meant by “assessment for learning”. The second dimension is methodological, and it discusses how the design of activities in class, by including digital technologies, can enhance the learning of the skills of philosophizing. The empirical accomplishment of this second dimension will be done through the description and analysis of two empirical excerpts implemented in the academic year 2019-2020 by the author of this article, with a class of 21 students from 10th grade in the science and technology course at a school in the Center Of Portugal. Feedback and formative assessment were systematically introduced in conceptualization and argumentation exercises, developed by students in sequences of activity. The evaluated products were texts and graphic representations of arguments, developed using Google Drive digital technologies. A final balance will highlight the gains achieved. Some constraints to a possible extension of these pedagogical processes to a more generalized practice of Philosophy teachers will also be mentioned.Ayant pour base l’analyse de situations empiriques, nous avons l’intention de discuter de la question suivante : «Comment les technologies numériques peuvent-elles soutenir l’introduction systémique d’une dimension formative de l’évaluation pour améliorer l’apprentissage de la philosophie ?». L’analyse de cette question prendra comme point de départ le cadre juridique actuel de l’autonomie et de la flexibilité des programmes et des lignes directrices internationales telles que celles du Cadre Européen de Compétences Numériques pour les Éducateurs et sera réalisée dans une double dimension. La première dimension est pédagogique et cherche à réfléchir sur l’importance de la dimension formatrice de l’évaluation, dans ce que l’on comprend par « évaluation pour l’apprentissage ».La deuxième dimension est méthodologique et examine comment la conception d’activités de classe, incluant les technologies numériques, peut améliorer l’apprentissage des compétences pour philosopher. La réalisation empirique de cette deuxième dimension sera faite à travers la description et l’analyse de deux extraits empiriques mis en oeuvre au cours de l’année scolaire 2019-2020 par l’auteur de cet article, avec une classe de 21 élèves de la 10e année de scolarité dans le cours de science et technologie dans une école de la région Centre du Portugal. Le feedback et l’évaluation formative ont été systématiquement introduits dans les exercices de conceptualisation et d’argumentation, développés par les étudiants dans des séquences d’activités. Les produits évalués étaient des textes et des représentations graphiques d’arguments, développés avec les technologies numériques de Google Drive. Nous allons essayer de montrer comment l’utilisation des technologies numériques de Google Drive a été utilisée pour introduire systématiquement des commentaires et des mécanismes d’évaluation formative dans les processus d’apprentissage. Un bilan final mettra en évidence les acquis. Quelques contraintes à une éventuelle extension d’une conception pédagogique de l’évaluation à une pratique plus généralisée des professeurs de philosophie dans l’enseignement secondaire au Portugal seront également énoncées.A partir da análise de situações empíricas, pretende-se com este estudo dar resposta à seguinte questão: “De que forma as tecnologias digitais podem suportar uma avaliação formativa para potenciar as aprendizagens na aula de Filosofia?”. A análise desta questão parte do atual enquadramento legal da autonomia e flexibilidade curricular em Portugal e orientações internacionais como as do Quadro Europeu de Competência Digital para Educadores e será efetuada numa dupla dimensão. A primeira dimensão é pedagógica e nela procura-se refletir sobre a importância da dimensão formativa e formadora da avaliação, no que se entende por “avaliação para as aprendizagens”. A segunda dimensão é metodológica e nela discute-se de que forma o desenho das atividades em aula, ao incluir tecnologias digitais, pode potenciar as aprendizagens das competências próprias do filosofar. A concretização empírica desta segunda dimensão far-se-á pela descrição e análise de dois recortes empíricos implementados no ano letivo de 2019-2020, pela autora deste artigo, com uma turma de 21 alunos do 10.º ano de escolaridade do curso de ciências e tecnologias de uma escola da Região Centro de Portugal. O feedback e a avaliação formativa foram sistematicamente introduzidos em exercícios de concetualização e de argumentação, desenvolvidos pelos alunos em sequências de atividades. Os produtos avaliados foram textos e representações gráficas de argumentos, desenvolvidos com as tecnologias digitais do Google Drive. Um balanço final realçará os resultados alcançados. Serão também enunciados constrangimentos à extensão de uma concepção pedagógica da avaliação a práticas mais generalizadas dos professores de Filosofia do ensino secundário em Portugal.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2021-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v13i3.25536https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v13i3.25536Indagatio Didactica; Vol 13 No 3 (2021); 197-214Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2021); 197-214Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 13 No 3 (2021); 197-214Indagatio Didactica; vol. 13 n.º 3 (2021); 197-2141647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/25536https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/25536/18402http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernardo, IsabelVieira, Rui Marquesde Sá, Alexandre Franco2023-09-22T10:19:14Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/25536Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:30.415851Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
Avaliação para as aprendizagens: tecnologias digitais para a avaliação na aula de Filosofia do ensino secundário em Portugal
title Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
spellingShingle Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
Bernardo, Isabel
title_short Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
title_full Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
title_fullStr Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
title_sort Assessment for learning: technologies resources for assessment in the Philosophy class in secondary education in Portugal
author Bernardo, Isabel
author_facet Bernardo, Isabel
Vieira, Rui Marques
de Sá, Alexandre Franco
author_role author
author2 Vieira, Rui Marques
de Sá, Alexandre Franco
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bernardo, Isabel
Vieira, Rui Marques
de Sá, Alexandre Franco
description Based on the analysis of empirical situations, we intend to discuss the following question: “How can digital technologies support the systemic introduction of a formative dimension of evaluation to enhance learning in Philosophy?”. The analysis of this issue will take as its starting point the current legal framework of curricular autonomy and flexibility and international guidelines such as those of the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators and will be carried out in a double dimension. The first dimension is pedagogical and seeks to reflect on the importance of the formative dimension of assessment, in what is meant by “assessment for learning”. The second dimension is methodological, and it discusses how the design of activities in class, by including digital technologies, can enhance the learning of the skills of philosophizing. The empirical accomplishment of this second dimension will be done through the description and analysis of two empirical excerpts implemented in the academic year 2019-2020 by the author of this article, with a class of 21 students from 10th grade in the science and technology course at a school in the Center Of Portugal. Feedback and formative assessment were systematically introduced in conceptualization and argumentation exercises, developed by students in sequences of activity. The evaluated products were texts and graphic representations of arguments, developed using Google Drive digital technologies. A final balance will highlight the gains achieved. Some constraints to a possible extension of these pedagogical processes to a more generalized practice of Philosophy teachers will also be mentioned.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-28
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v13i3.25536
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v13i3.25536
url https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v13i3.25536
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/25536
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/25536/18402
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Indagatio Didactica; Vol 13 No 3 (2021); 197-214
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2021); 197-214
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 13 No 3 (2021); 197-214
Indagatio Didactica; vol. 13 n.º 3 (2021); 197-214
1647-3582
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133573167448064