The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v4i1.672 |
Resumo: | Clay, as a sculpture material, is also used as a means of expression and psychological therapy. Often, we find examples of works whose creativity is a manifestation of anxieties and inner conflicts of the artists in this material. We can say that much of the creative folk art, has a subconscious component, in its creativity, that “shows the artist” and how he feels the themes. This characteristic is also found in the works of trained artists, in theses perhaps more hidden, because these are more aware of the phenomenon. In other words: the art of clay sculpture and its creativity will be as much “at the surface” as the artist’s training allows it. The question that we could ask, namely in relation to popular art and handicraft, would be, which art is the most genuine? The one which is more aware of this phenomenon or the one is less aware of this phenomenon? Popular art and handicraft are also built and promoted, in their aspect of creation, production and dissemination along two apparently antagonistic axes. Do figurative popular clay sculpture, have their creative roots in raw and naive primitive art? Or rather in the elaborate and sumptuous emotional productions of the Baroque? In this work we will analyze the case study of the Aldeia da Terra project to try to establish parallels and draw from these conclusions. Understanding this problem can also help us to understand the reality of the creation, production and dissemination of popular art and popular ceramic figurative sculpture that is practiced not only in Portugal, but with the inherent characteristics of its own, in all countries. |
id |
RCAP_2ade9b433bd6ab77097f74ff7b6a3cde |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:journals.ap2.pt:article/672 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case studyO artesanato e a escultura popular em barro. Arte sentida ou arte pensada? Estudo de caso Aldeia da TerraClay, as a sculpture material, is also used as a means of expression and psychological therapy. Often, we find examples of works whose creativity is a manifestation of anxieties and inner conflicts of the artists in this material. We can say that much of the creative folk art, has a subconscious component, in its creativity, that “shows the artist” and how he feels the themes. This characteristic is also found in the works of trained artists, in theses perhaps more hidden, because these are more aware of the phenomenon. In other words: the art of clay sculpture and its creativity will be as much “at the surface” as the artist’s training allows it. The question that we could ask, namely in relation to popular art and handicraft, would be, which art is the most genuine? The one which is more aware of this phenomenon or the one is less aware of this phenomenon? Popular art and handicraft are also built and promoted, in their aspect of creation, production and dissemination along two apparently antagonistic axes. Do figurative popular clay sculpture, have their creative roots in raw and naive primitive art? Or rather in the elaborate and sumptuous emotional productions of the Baroque? In this work we will analyze the case study of the Aldeia da Terra project to try to establish parallels and draw from these conclusions. Understanding this problem can also help us to understand the reality of the creation, production and dissemination of popular art and popular ceramic figurative sculpture that is practiced not only in Portugal, but with the inherent characteristics of its own, in all countries.O barro, como material de escultura, também é usado como meio de expressão e terapia psicológica. Muitas vezes, encontramos exemplos de obras cuja criatividade é uma manifestação de ansiedades e conflitos internos dos artistas neste material. Podemos dizer que grande parte da arte folclórica criativa, tem uma componente subconsciente, na sua criatividade, que “mostra o artista” e como sente os temas. Esta característica encontra-se também nas obras de artistas treinados, em teses talvez mais escondidas, porque estas estão mais conscientes do fenómeno. Por outras palavras: a arte da escultura em barro e a sua criatividade serão tanto “à superfície” como a formação do artista o permite. A pergunta que poderíamos fazer, nomeadamente em relação à arte popular e ao artesanato, seria qual a arte mais genuína? Aquele que está mais consciente deste fenómeno ou aquele que está menos consciente deste fenómeno? A arte popular e o artesanato também são construídos e promovidos, na sua vertente de criação, produção e divulgação ao longo de dois eixos aparentemente antagónicos. A escultura de barro popular figurativa tem as suas raízes criativas em arte primitiva crua e ingénua? Ou melhor, nas elaboradas e sumptuosas produções emocionais do barroco? Neste trabalho vamos analisar o estudo de caso do projeto Aldeia da Terra para tentar estabelecer paralelos e tirar partido destas conclusões. Compreender este problema pode também ajudar-nos a compreender a realidade da criação, produção e divulgação da arte popular e da escultura figurativa cerâmica popular que é praticada não só em Portugal, mas com as suas próprias características, em todos os países.Urbancreativity.org2022-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v4i1.672https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v4i1.672CAP - Public Art Journal; Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Sculpture and Artistic Studies; 74 - 89Cadernos de Arte Pública; v. 4 n. 1 (2022): Sculpture and Artistic Studies; 74 - 89CAP - Cadernos de Arte Pública / Public Art Journal; v. 4 n. 1 (2022): Escultura e Estudos Artísticos; 74 - 892184-6197reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://journals.ap2.pt/index.php/CAP/article/view/672https://journals.ap2.pt/index.php/CAP/article/view/672/413Cabeça, Paulo Tiagoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-02-05T07:08:05Zoai:journals.ap2.pt:article/672Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:46:13.447774Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study O artesanato e a escultura popular em barro. Arte sentida ou arte pensada? Estudo de caso Aldeia da Terra |
title |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study |
spellingShingle |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study Cabeça, Paulo Tiago |
title_short |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study |
title_full |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study |
title_fullStr |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study |
title_sort |
The crafts and the popular sculpture in clay. Art felt in or Art thought of? Aldeia da Terra case study |
author |
Cabeça, Paulo Tiago |
author_facet |
Cabeça, Paulo Tiago |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cabeça, Paulo Tiago |
description |
Clay, as a sculpture material, is also used as a means of expression and psychological therapy. Often, we find examples of works whose creativity is a manifestation of anxieties and inner conflicts of the artists in this material. We can say that much of the creative folk art, has a subconscious component, in its creativity, that “shows the artist” and how he feels the themes. This characteristic is also found in the works of trained artists, in theses perhaps more hidden, because these are more aware of the phenomenon. In other words: the art of clay sculpture and its creativity will be as much “at the surface” as the artist’s training allows it. The question that we could ask, namely in relation to popular art and handicraft, would be, which art is the most genuine? The one which is more aware of this phenomenon or the one is less aware of this phenomenon? Popular art and handicraft are also built and promoted, in their aspect of creation, production and dissemination along two apparently antagonistic axes. Do figurative popular clay sculpture, have their creative roots in raw and naive primitive art? Or rather in the elaborate and sumptuous emotional productions of the Baroque? In this work we will analyze the case study of the Aldeia da Terra project to try to establish parallels and draw from these conclusions. Understanding this problem can also help us to understand the reality of the creation, production and dissemination of popular art and popular ceramic figurative sculpture that is practiced not only in Portugal, but with the inherent characteristics of its own, in all countries. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v4i1.672 https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v4i1.672 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.48619/cap.v4i1.672 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://journals.ap2.pt/index.php/CAP/article/view/672 https://journals.ap2.pt/index.php/CAP/article/view/672/413 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Urbancreativity.org |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Urbancreativity.org |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
CAP - Public Art Journal; Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Sculpture and Artistic Studies; 74 - 89 Cadernos de Arte Pública; v. 4 n. 1 (2022): Sculpture and Artistic Studies; 74 - 89 CAP - Cadernos de Arte Pública / Public Art Journal; v. 4 n. 1 (2022): Escultura e Estudos Artísticos; 74 - 89 2184-6197 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130933674115072 |