Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, João
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lavradio, Leonor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674
Resumo: More and more social science studies are now acquiring data through the internet, reaching participantsonline. Some participants start out engaged and motivated to participate, but progressively slide into“rushing behaviors”. We inquired experts in survey responding about when, in online studies, theywould feel a desire for rushing (defined as speeding with no concerns about the quality of responses).This qualitative approach uncovered Repetition, Survey length and No interest in topic as the threemain features that would motivate these participants to rush in surveys. Subsequent inquiry of thesame participants indicated that repetition concerns the type of questions made (more than stimuli ortask), the execution of the same task more than 5-6 times, or for more than 6 minutes. Survey lengthconcerns a preference for shorter surveys, as well as the subjective experience in which length exceedspreviously set expectations (i.e., longer than announced), contributing to rushing by effectivelylowering the hourly pay rate as the survey increases in length. Interest in topic was reported to beconsistently low, despite not being the main reason to quit the survey. However, a change in expectedlevel of interest in the middle of the survey is reported as a factor that will promote rushing behaviors.We discuss these data as informative regarding how pre-tests of surveys can benefit from theseparticipants’ expertise.
id RCAP_2b3e554c7ec4a9d2bc3422a025090ada
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/1674
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveysPressa para acabar: Percepções de participantes dos aspectos desmotivadores em estudos onlineOnline survey, Rushing, Data validity.Estudos online, Apressar, Validade de dados.More and more social science studies are now acquiring data through the internet, reaching participantsonline. Some participants start out engaged and motivated to participate, but progressively slide into“rushing behaviors”. We inquired experts in survey responding about when, in online studies, theywould feel a desire for rushing (defined as speeding with no concerns about the quality of responses).This qualitative approach uncovered Repetition, Survey length and No interest in topic as the threemain features that would motivate these participants to rush in surveys. Subsequent inquiry of thesame participants indicated that repetition concerns the type of questions made (more than stimuli ortask), the execution of the same task more than 5-6 times, or for more than 6 minutes. Survey lengthconcerns a preference for shorter surveys, as well as the subjective experience in which length exceedspreviously set expectations (i.e., longer than announced), contributing to rushing by effectivelylowering the hourly pay rate as the survey increases in length. Interest in topic was reported to beconsistently low, despite not being the main reason to quit the survey. However, a change in expectedlevel of interest in the middle of the survey is reported as a factor that will promote rushing behaviors.We discuss these data as informative regarding how pre-tests of surveys can benefit from theseparticipants’ expertise.Cada vez mais, estudos na área das ciências sociais, são dados adquiridos na internet, chegando aparticipantes online. Alguns participantes iniciam a sua participação de forma empenhada e motivada,mas desenvolvem, progressivamente, “comportamentos apressados”. Inquirimos participantesexperientes em participar em estudos online sobre as razões que os levariam a sentir motivação paraapressar (definido como acelerar a participação sem preocupação pela sua qualidade). Esta abordagemrevelou Repetição, Duração do estudo e Desinteresse no tópico como os três aspectos centrais quelevariam os participantes a apressar estudos. Subsequentemente, os mesmos participantes indicaramque a repetição diz respeito ao tipo de questão (mais do que o tipo de estímulo ou tarefa), e à execuçãoda mesma tarefa mais de 5-6 vezes, ou com uma duração superior a 6 minutos. A duração do estudodiz respeito à preferência por estudos mais curtos, bem como a experiência subjectiva da duraçãoexceder expectativas prévias (i.e., duração superior à anunciada), levando a apressar, dada a reduçãodo pagamento por hora à medida que o estudo vai aumentando em duração. Desinteresse no tópicofoi reportado como sendo consistentemente elevado, embora não seja uma razão principal paraabandonar o estudo – no entanto, havendo uma alteração no esperado nível de interesse a meio doestudo, foi reportado como um factor promotor de apressar a participação. Discutimos estes dadosincidindo na sua relevância, e enquanto indicadores de como pré-testes com participantes peritospoderão beneficiar estudos online.ISPA - Instituto Universitário2020-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 241-256Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 241-2561646-60200870-8231reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1674http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1674/pdf_1http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1674/277http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1674/279Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins, JoãoLavradio, Leonor2023-05-11T10:19:40Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/1674Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:51:10.474525Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
Pressa para acabar: Percepções de participantes dos aspectos desmotivadores em estudos online
title Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
spellingShingle Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
Martins, João
Online survey, Rushing, Data validity.
Estudos online, Apressar, Validade de dados.
title_short Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
title_full Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
title_fullStr Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
title_full_unstemmed Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
title_sort Rushing to the end: Participants’ perceptions of demotivating aspects of online surveys
author Martins, João
author_facet Martins, João
Lavradio, Leonor
author_role author
author2 Lavradio, Leonor
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, João
Lavradio, Leonor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Online survey, Rushing, Data validity.
Estudos online, Apressar, Validade de dados.
topic Online survey, Rushing, Data validity.
Estudos online, Apressar, Validade de dados.
description More and more social science studies are now acquiring data through the internet, reaching participantsonline. Some participants start out engaged and motivated to participate, but progressively slide into“rushing behaviors”. We inquired experts in survey responding about when, in online studies, theywould feel a desire for rushing (defined as speeding with no concerns about the quality of responses).This qualitative approach uncovered Repetition, Survey length and No interest in topic as the threemain features that would motivate these participants to rush in surveys. Subsequent inquiry of thesame participants indicated that repetition concerns the type of questions made (more than stimuli ortask), the execution of the same task more than 5-6 times, or for more than 6 minutes. Survey lengthconcerns a preference for shorter surveys, as well as the subjective experience in which length exceedspreviously set expectations (i.e., longer than announced), contributing to rushing by effectivelylowering the hourly pay rate as the survey increases in length. Interest in topic was reported to beconsistently low, despite not being the main reason to quit the survey. However, a change in expectedlevel of interest in the middle of the survey is reported as a factor that will promote rushing behaviors.We discuss these data as informative regarding how pre-tests of surveys can benefit from theseparticipants’ expertise.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674
https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674
url https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1674
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1674
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/view/1674/pdf_1
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1674/277
http://publicacoes.ispa.pt/index.php/ap/article/downloadSuppFile/1674/279
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Análise Psicológica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Universitário
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISPA - Instituto Universitário
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 241-256
Análise Psicológica; Vol 38, No 2 (2020); 241-256
1646-6020
0870-8231
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131590279823360