EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pircher, Brigitte
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5295
Resumo: Public procurement is a policy area located between two contradictory tendencies. On the one hand, the European Commission strives for greater competition to widen procurement markets. On the other hand, the boosting of competition encounters resistance among the member states. This article investigates how these colliding tendencies played out during the initial stages of the Covid-19 crisis and, more specifically, how changes in the field of procurement affected legitimate governance in the EU. Based on institutionalist and EU governance theories, the study contributes to the literature with three principal findings. First, it demonstrates that the pandemic enabled exogenously driven changes in the field of public procurement with new policies and guidelines, while the EU’s overall aims in this field were upheld. Second, the study demonstrates that the Commission was the main driver of change and that it enhanced the harmonisation of procurement rules and supranational integration despite the crisis. Third, while these changes strengthened the role of supranational actors, the study demonstrates that the changes introduced allow member states increased flexibility when it comes to the implementation. In practice, however, this flexibility has the potential to undermine the EU’s initial aims, thereby jeopardising the EU’s legitimacy.
id RCAP_2c08ce451ac801ad7037db60dabc5744
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5295
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?Covid-19; EU governance; European Commission; European integration; institutionalism; legitimacy; public procurementPublic procurement is a policy area located between two contradictory tendencies. On the one hand, the European Commission strives for greater competition to widen procurement markets. On the other hand, the boosting of competition encounters resistance among the member states. This article investigates how these colliding tendencies played out during the initial stages of the Covid-19 crisis and, more specifically, how changes in the field of procurement affected legitimate governance in the EU. Based on institutionalist and EU governance theories, the study contributes to the literature with three principal findings. First, it demonstrates that the pandemic enabled exogenously driven changes in the field of public procurement with new policies and guidelines, while the EU’s overall aims in this field were upheld. Second, the study demonstrates that the Commission was the main driver of change and that it enhanced the harmonisation of procurement rules and supranational integration despite the crisis. Third, while these changes strengthened the role of supranational actors, the study demonstrates that the changes introduced allow member states increased flexibility when it comes to the implementation. In practice, however, this flexibility has the potential to undermine the EU’s initial aims, thereby jeopardising the EU’s legitimacy.Cogitatio2022-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5295oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5295Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Legitimacy and Global Economic Ties; 131-1422183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5295https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5295https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5295/5295https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5295/2585Copyright (c) 2022 Brigitte Pircherhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPircher, Brigitte2022-10-21T16:04:13Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5295Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:13:54.210844Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
title EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
spellingShingle EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
Pircher, Brigitte
Covid-19; EU governance; European Commission; European integration; institutionalism; legitimacy; public procurement
title_short EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
title_full EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
title_fullStr EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
title_full_unstemmed EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
title_sort EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?
author Pircher, Brigitte
author_facet Pircher, Brigitte
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pircher, Brigitte
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Covid-19; EU governance; European Commission; European integration; institutionalism; legitimacy; public procurement
topic Covid-19; EU governance; European Commission; European integration; institutionalism; legitimacy; public procurement
description Public procurement is a policy area located between two contradictory tendencies. On the one hand, the European Commission strives for greater competition to widen procurement markets. On the other hand, the boosting of competition encounters resistance among the member states. This article investigates how these colliding tendencies played out during the initial stages of the Covid-19 crisis and, more specifically, how changes in the field of procurement affected legitimate governance in the EU. Based on institutionalist and EU governance theories, the study contributes to the literature with three principal findings. First, it demonstrates that the pandemic enabled exogenously driven changes in the field of public procurement with new policies and guidelines, while the EU’s overall aims in this field were upheld. Second, the study demonstrates that the Commission was the main driver of change and that it enhanced the harmonisation of procurement rules and supranational integration despite the crisis. Third, while these changes strengthened the role of supranational actors, the study demonstrates that the changes introduced allow member states increased flexibility when it comes to the implementation. In practice, however, this flexibility has the potential to undermine the EU’s initial aims, thereby jeopardising the EU’s legitimacy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-23
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5295
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5295
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5295
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5295
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5295
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5295
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5295/5295
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/5295/2585
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brigitte Pircher
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brigitte Pircher
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): Legitimacy and Global Economic Ties; 131-142
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130592021839872