Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jafrancesco, David
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Cardoso, João P., Mutuberria, Amaia, Leonardi, Erminia, Les, Iñigo, Sansoni, Paola, Francini, Franco, Fontani, Daniela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.9/3112
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Heliostat field layout design is a critical task in solar tower power plant construction due to its impact in the final plant efficiency and cost. The complexity of these systems and the high number of parameters to define during the field design stage demand the use of suitable simulation tools to compare different design options and evaluate the final performance of the heliostat field. This work concerns a comparison of some of the most common tools used for the heliostat field layout design and analysis, aiming to help Concentrating Solar Power researchers and industry by providing more information regarding the tools comparative results and features. A brief review of available tools is presented, including an extended description of some of them - Tonatiuh, SolTrace, TracePro and CRS4-2. A qualitative comparison of these four tools is performed focusing on functionality and usability. A quantitative comparison is done providing simulation results for a test-case, the SPSS-CRS facility located at Plataforma Solar de Almeria in Spain. In general, the results for total power and maximum irradiance are in good agreement across most tools. The total power values are very close for Tonatiuh, SolTrace and CRS4-2. Apart from the designer preferences, the choice of the most suitable tool depends on the specific application and requirements.
id RCAP_2c5e926b79f7a28636f4730cbfbb79d3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.lneg.pt:10400.9/3112
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software toolsConcentrated solar powerOptical modelingCentral receiver systemSimulationHeliostatABSTRACT: Heliostat field layout design is a critical task in solar tower power plant construction due to its impact in the final plant efficiency and cost. The complexity of these systems and the high number of parameters to define during the field design stage demand the use of suitable simulation tools to compare different design options and evaluate the final performance of the heliostat field. This work concerns a comparison of some of the most common tools used for the heliostat field layout design and analysis, aiming to help Concentrating Solar Power researchers and industry by providing more information regarding the tools comparative results and features. A brief review of available tools is presented, including an extended description of some of them - Tonatiuh, SolTrace, TracePro and CRS4-2. A qualitative comparison of these four tools is performed focusing on functionality and usability. A quantitative comparison is done providing simulation results for a test-case, the SPSS-CRS facility located at Plataforma Solar de Almeria in Spain. In general, the results for total power and maximum irradiance are in good agreement across most tools. The total power values are very close for Tonatiuh, SolTrace and CRS4-2. Apart from the designer preferences, the choice of the most suitable tool depends on the specific application and requirements.ElsevierRepositório do LNEGJafrancesco, DavidCardoso, João P.Mutuberria, AmaiaLeonardi, ErminiaLes, IñigoSansoni, PaolaFrancini, FrancoFontani, Daniela2019-01-24T11:15:15Z20182018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.9/3112engJafrancesco, D.; Cardoso, J.P.; Mutuberria, A... [et.al.] - Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, Vol. 94, p. 792-8031364-0321info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-23T06:27:21Zoai:repositorio.lneg.pt:10400.9/3112Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:36:16.289250Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
title Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
spellingShingle Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
Jafrancesco, David
Concentrated solar power
Optical modeling
Central receiver system
Simulation
Heliostat
title_short Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
title_full Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
title_fullStr Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
title_full_unstemmed Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
title_sort Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools
author Jafrancesco, David
author_facet Jafrancesco, David
Cardoso, João P.
Mutuberria, Amaia
Leonardi, Erminia
Les, Iñigo
Sansoni, Paola
Francini, Franco
Fontani, Daniela
author_role author
author2 Cardoso, João P.
Mutuberria, Amaia
Leonardi, Erminia
Les, Iñigo
Sansoni, Paola
Francini, Franco
Fontani, Daniela
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório do LNEG
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jafrancesco, David
Cardoso, João P.
Mutuberria, Amaia
Leonardi, Erminia
Les, Iñigo
Sansoni, Paola
Francini, Franco
Fontani, Daniela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Concentrated solar power
Optical modeling
Central receiver system
Simulation
Heliostat
topic Concentrated solar power
Optical modeling
Central receiver system
Simulation
Heliostat
description ABSTRACT: Heliostat field layout design is a critical task in solar tower power plant construction due to its impact in the final plant efficiency and cost. The complexity of these systems and the high number of parameters to define during the field design stage demand the use of suitable simulation tools to compare different design options and evaluate the final performance of the heliostat field. This work concerns a comparison of some of the most common tools used for the heliostat field layout design and analysis, aiming to help Concentrating Solar Power researchers and industry by providing more information regarding the tools comparative results and features. A brief review of available tools is presented, including an extended description of some of them - Tonatiuh, SolTrace, TracePro and CRS4-2. A qualitative comparison of these four tools is performed focusing on functionality and usability. A quantitative comparison is done providing simulation results for a test-case, the SPSS-CRS facility located at Plataforma Solar de Almeria in Spain. In general, the results for total power and maximum irradiance are in good agreement across most tools. The total power values are very close for Tonatiuh, SolTrace and CRS4-2. Apart from the designer preferences, the choice of the most suitable tool depends on the specific application and requirements.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-01-24T11:15:15Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.9/3112
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.9/3112
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Jafrancesco, D.; Cardoso, J.P.; Mutuberria, A... [et.al.] - Optical simulation of a central receiver system : comparison of different software tools. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, Vol. 94, p. 792-803
1364-0321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130228126121984