Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764 https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 |
Resumo: | Decent work is the sum of people’s aspirations in their working lives. This article aims to report the results of a systematically conducted literature review of empirical research concerning decent work. Electronic databases B-On and EBESCO host, using the keywords ‘decent work’ in the ‘title’ and ‘abstract’, yielded 689 citations. After a two-stage application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 articles were retained for analysis. All studies were conducted between 2003 and 2017. The studies focused on work conditions in the case of decent work deficit, those workers not benefiting from decent work conditions, and what is necessary for the existence of decent work. Study samples consisted typically of workers from different sectors and countries. Data collection was mainly by interview or institutional statistical databases and most studies were descriptive and cross-sectional. The results of this review show that empirical research on decent work is grounded in various disciplines and is still in its early stages. Additionally, most studies report decent work deficit and do not cover the whole decent work concept. Medium, low, and very low development countries are under-researched. |
id |
RCAP_2c7e0e3ae6e9491e70370a7588f18fab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/25764 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature ReviewDecent workLiterature reviewEmpirical researchDecent work is the sum of people’s aspirations in their working lives. This article aims to report the results of a systematically conducted literature review of empirical research concerning decent work. Electronic databases B-On and EBESCO host, using the keywords ‘decent work’ in the ‘title’ and ‘abstract’, yielded 689 citations. After a two-stage application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 articles were retained for analysis. All studies were conducted between 2003 and 2017. The studies focused on work conditions in the case of decent work deficit, those workers not benefiting from decent work conditions, and what is necessary for the existence of decent work. Study samples consisted typically of workers from different sectors and countries. Data collection was mainly by interview or institutional statistical databases and most studies were descriptive and cross-sectional. The results of this review show that empirical research on decent work is grounded in various disciplines and is still in its early stages. Additionally, most studies report decent work deficit and do not cover the whole decent work concept. Medium, low, and very low development countries are under-researched.FCTScandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology2019-08-13T10:02:10Z2019-08-132019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53engCEFAGEndnrs@uevora.ptleonorpais@fpce.uc.pt680Pereira, Susanados Santos, Nuno RebeloPais, Leonorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:19:53Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/25764Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:16:09.818063Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
title |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
spellingShingle |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review Pereira, Susana Decent work Literature review Empirical research |
title_short |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
title_full |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
title_sort |
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review |
author |
Pereira, Susana |
author_facet |
Pereira, Susana dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo Pais, Leonor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo Pais, Leonor |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Susana dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo Pais, Leonor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Decent work Literature review Empirical research |
topic |
Decent work Literature review Empirical research |
description |
Decent work is the sum of people’s aspirations in their working lives. This article aims to report the results of a systematically conducted literature review of empirical research concerning decent work. Electronic databases B-On and EBESCO host, using the keywords ‘decent work’ in the ‘title’ and ‘abstract’, yielded 689 citations. After a two-stage application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 articles were retained for analysis. All studies were conducted between 2003 and 2017. The studies focused on work conditions in the case of decent work deficit, those workers not benefiting from decent work conditions, and what is necessary for the existence of decent work. Study samples consisted typically of workers from different sectors and countries. Data collection was mainly by interview or institutional statistical databases and most studies were descriptive and cross-sectional. The results of this review show that empirical research on decent work is grounded in various disciplines and is still in its early stages. Additionally, most studies report decent work deficit and do not cover the whole decent work concept. Medium, low, and very low development countries are under-researched. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-13T10:02:10Z 2019-08-13 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764 https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764 https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764 https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
CEFAGE nd nrs@uevora.pt leonorpais@fpce.uc.pt 680 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136643473473536 |