Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Susana
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo, Pais, Leonor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764
https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
Resumo: Decent work is the sum of people’s aspirations in their working lives. This article aims to report the results of a systematically conducted literature review of empirical research concerning decent work. Electronic databases B-On and EBESCO host, using the keywords ‘decent work’ in the ‘title’ and ‘abstract’, yielded 689 citations. After a two-stage application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 articles were retained for analysis. All studies were conducted between 2003 and 2017. The studies focused on work conditions in the case of decent work deficit, those workers not benefiting from decent work conditions, and what is necessary for the existence of decent work. Study samples consisted typically of workers from different sectors and countries. Data collection was mainly by interview or institutional statistical databases and most studies were descriptive and cross-sectional. The results of this review show that empirical research on decent work is grounded in various disciplines and is still in its early stages. Additionally, most studies report decent work deficit and do not cover the whole decent work concept. Medium, low, and very low development countries are under-researched.
id RCAP_2c7e0e3ae6e9491e70370a7588f18fab
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/25764
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature ReviewDecent workLiterature reviewEmpirical researchDecent work is the sum of people’s aspirations in their working lives. This article aims to report the results of a systematically conducted literature review of empirical research concerning decent work. Electronic databases B-On and EBESCO host, using the keywords ‘decent work’ in the ‘title’ and ‘abstract’, yielded 689 citations. After a two-stage application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 articles were retained for analysis. All studies were conducted between 2003 and 2017. The studies focused on work conditions in the case of decent work deficit, those workers not benefiting from decent work conditions, and what is necessary for the existence of decent work. Study samples consisted typically of workers from different sectors and countries. Data collection was mainly by interview or institutional statistical databases and most studies were descriptive and cross-sectional. The results of this review show that empirical research on decent work is grounded in various disciplines and is still in its early stages. Additionally, most studies report decent work deficit and do not cover the whole decent work concept. Medium, low, and very low development countries are under-researched.FCTScandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology2019-08-13T10:02:10Z2019-08-132019-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53engCEFAGEndnrs@uevora.ptleonorpais@fpce.uc.pt680Pereira, Susanados Santos, Nuno RebeloPais, Leonorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:19:53Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/25764Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:16:09.818063Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
title Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
spellingShingle Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
Pereira, Susana
Decent work
Literature review
Empirical research
title_short Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
title_full Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
title_fullStr Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
title_sort Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review
author Pereira, Susana
author_facet Pereira, Susana
dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo
Pais, Leonor
author_role author
author2 dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo
Pais, Leonor
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Susana
dos Santos, Nuno Rebelo
Pais, Leonor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Decent work
Literature review
Empirical research
topic Decent work
Literature review
Empirical research
description Decent work is the sum of people’s aspirations in their working lives. This article aims to report the results of a systematically conducted literature review of empirical research concerning decent work. Electronic databases B-On and EBESCO host, using the keywords ‘decent work’ in the ‘title’ and ‘abstract’, yielded 689 citations. After a two-stage application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 articles were retained for analysis. All studies were conducted between 2003 and 2017. The studies focused on work conditions in the case of decent work deficit, those workers not benefiting from decent work conditions, and what is necessary for the existence of decent work. Study samples consisted typically of workers from different sectors and countries. Data collection was mainly by interview or institutional statistical databases and most studies were descriptive and cross-sectional. The results of this review show that empirical research on decent work is grounded in various disciplines and is still in its early stages. Additionally, most studies report decent work deficit and do not cover the whole decent work concept. Medium, low, and very low development countries are under-researched.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-13T10:02:10Z
2019-08-13
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764
https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764
https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/25764
https://doi.org/Pereira, S., et al. (2019). Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1): 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv CEFAGE
nd
nrs@uevora.pt
leonorpais@fpce.uc.pt
680
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136643473473536