Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dollbaum, Jan Matti
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4217
Resumo: The investigation of long-term trends in contentious politics relies heavily on protest event analysis based on newspaper reports. This tends to be problematic in restricted media environments. To mitigate the effects of bias and (self-)censorship, researchers of protest in authoritarian regimes have experimented with other sources such as international media and dissident websites. However, even though classical news media are easier targets for repression, journalistic reports might still outperform other sources regarding the quality of information provided. Although these advantages and disadvantages are known in the literature, different types of sources have seldom been tested against each other in an authoritarian context. Using the example of Russia between 2007 and 2012, the present article systematically compares protest event data from English-language news agencies, dissident websites, and several local sources, first and foremost with a view to improving methodological knowledge. The analysis addresses broad trends across time and space as well as the coverage of specific regions and single protest events. It finds that although the data sources paint different pictures of protest in Russia, this divergence is systematic and can be put to productive use. The article closes with a discussion on how its findings can be applied in other contexts.
id RCAP_2dd07e0d38fbc53a7020148fa0ab3515
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4217
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sourcesauthoritarian regimes; media freedom; opposition; protest event analysis; RussiaThe investigation of long-term trends in contentious politics relies heavily on protest event analysis based on newspaper reports. This tends to be problematic in restricted media environments. To mitigate the effects of bias and (self-)censorship, researchers of protest in authoritarian regimes have experimented with other sources such as international media and dissident websites. However, even though classical news media are easier targets for repression, journalistic reports might still outperform other sources regarding the quality of information provided. Although these advantages and disadvantages are known in the literature, different types of sources have seldom been tested against each other in an authoritarian context. Using the example of Russia between 2007 and 2012, the present article systematically compares protest event data from English-language news agencies, dissident websites, and several local sources, first and foremost with a view to improving methodological knowledge. The analysis addresses broad trends across time and space as well as the coverage of specific regions and single protest events. It finds that although the data sources paint different pictures of protest in Russia, this divergence is systematic and can be put to productive use. The article closes with a discussion on how its findings can be applied in other contexts.Cogitatio2021-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4217oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4217Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Media Control Revisited: Challenges, Bottom-Up Resistance and Agency in the Digital Age; 104-1152183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4217https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4217https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4217/4217https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/4217/1702Copyright (c) 2021 Jan Matti Dollbaumhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDollbaum, Jan Matti2022-12-20T10:57:52Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4217Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:20:34.724629Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
title Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
spellingShingle Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
Dollbaum, Jan Matti
authoritarian regimes; media freedom; opposition; protest event analysis; Russia
title_short Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
title_full Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
title_fullStr Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
title_full_unstemmed Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
title_sort Protest Event Analysis Under Conditions of Limited Press Freedom: Comparing Data Sources
author Dollbaum, Jan Matti
author_facet Dollbaum, Jan Matti
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dollbaum, Jan Matti
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv authoritarian regimes; media freedom; opposition; protest event analysis; Russia
topic authoritarian regimes; media freedom; opposition; protest event analysis; Russia
description The investigation of long-term trends in contentious politics relies heavily on protest event analysis based on newspaper reports. This tends to be problematic in restricted media environments. To mitigate the effects of bias and (self-)censorship, researchers of protest in authoritarian regimes have experimented with other sources such as international media and dissident websites. However, even though classical news media are easier targets for repression, journalistic reports might still outperform other sources regarding the quality of information provided. Although these advantages and disadvantages are known in the literature, different types of sources have seldom been tested against each other in an authoritarian context. Using the example of Russia between 2007 and 2012, the present article systematically compares protest event data from English-language news agencies, dissident websites, and several local sources, first and foremost with a view to improving methodological knowledge. The analysis addresses broad trends across time and space as well as the coverage of specific regions and single protest events. It finds that although the data sources paint different pictures of protest in Russia, this divergence is systematic and can be put to productive use. The article closes with a discussion on how its findings can be applied in other contexts.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-21
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4217
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4217
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4217
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4217
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4217
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4217
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4217/4217
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/downloadSuppFile/4217/1702
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jan Matti Dollbaum
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Jan Matti Dollbaum
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 9, No 4 (2021): Media Control Revisited: Challenges, Bottom-Up Resistance and Agency in the Digital Age; 104-115
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130654133190656