Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10451/55469 |
Resumo: | © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
id |
RCAP_2deae0c7f2115e58355ee8691a38197c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/55469 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online surveyCollective measuresCross-amplificationCross-country differencesProtective behaviorRisk perception© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)Background: In times of unprecedented infectious disease threats, it is essential to understand how to increase individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures. The present study therefore examines factors associated with individual and collective pathways. Methods: Data was collected through an online survey from 4483 participants (70.8% female, M = 41.2 years) across 10 countries from April 15, 2020 to June 2, 2020 as part of the "EUCLID" project (https://euclid.dbvis.de). Structural equation modeling was used to examine individual and collective pathways across and within countries. Results: Overall, the adoption of individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures were high. Risk perception on the individual level and perceived effectiveness at the collective level were positively associated with both individual protective behaviors and support for collective measures. Furthermore, the model explained considerable variance in individual (40.7%) and collective protective behaviors (40.8%) and was largely replicated across countries. Conclusions: The study extends previous research by demonstrating that individual risk perception and perceived effectiveness of collective measures jointly affect individual protective health behaviors and support for collective measures. These findings highlight the need to jointly consider a variety of behavioral actions against infectious disease threats, acknowledging interactions between individual and collective pathways.This study was funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – EXC 2117–422037984 (the Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour), and under FOR 2374 (RiskDynamics), and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research) under 01EL1820A (SMARTACT).ElsevierRepositório da Universidade de LisboaKoller, Julia E.Villinger, KarolineLages, Nadine C.Absetz, PilvikkiBamert, MelanieBranquinho, Cátia Sofia dos SantosChaves-Avilés, LourdesDimitropoulou, PanagiotaFernández-Fernández, Ana LucíaMatos, Margarida Gaspar deGriskevica, IngunaGutiérrez-Doña, BenicioHankonen, NelliInauen, JenniferJordanova Peshevska, DimitrinkaKassianos, Angelos P.Kolesnikova, JelenaLavrič, MetaMitanovska, TamaraNeter, EfratPoštuvan, VitaTrups-Kalne, IngridaVargas-Carmiol, JorgeSchupp, Harald T.Renner, Britta2022-12-20T15:56:39Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10451/55469engInt J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:356-3641201-971210.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.0121878-3511info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-08T17:02:27Zoai:repositorio.ul.pt:10451/55469Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:06:07.398897Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
title |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
spellingShingle |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey Koller, Julia E. Collective measures Cross-amplification Cross-country differences Protective behavior Risk perception |
title_short |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
title_full |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
title_fullStr |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
title_sort |
Individual and collective protective responses during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 10 different countries: results from the EUCLID online survey |
author |
Koller, Julia E. |
author_facet |
Koller, Julia E. Villinger, Karoline Lages, Nadine C. Absetz, Pilvikki Bamert, Melanie Branquinho, Cátia Sofia dos Santos Chaves-Avilés, Lourdes Dimitropoulou, Panagiota Fernández-Fernández, Ana Lucía Matos, Margarida Gaspar de Griskevica, Inguna Gutiérrez-Doña, Benicio Hankonen, Nelli Inauen, Jennifer Jordanova Peshevska, Dimitrinka Kassianos, Angelos P. Kolesnikova, Jelena Lavrič, Meta Mitanovska, Tamara Neter, Efrat Poštuvan, Vita Trups-Kalne, Ingrida Vargas-Carmiol, Jorge Schupp, Harald T. Renner, Britta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Villinger, Karoline Lages, Nadine C. Absetz, Pilvikki Bamert, Melanie Branquinho, Cátia Sofia dos Santos Chaves-Avilés, Lourdes Dimitropoulou, Panagiota Fernández-Fernández, Ana Lucía Matos, Margarida Gaspar de Griskevica, Inguna Gutiérrez-Doña, Benicio Hankonen, Nelli Inauen, Jennifer Jordanova Peshevska, Dimitrinka Kassianos, Angelos P. Kolesnikova, Jelena Lavrič, Meta Mitanovska, Tamara Neter, Efrat Poštuvan, Vita Trups-Kalne, Ingrida Vargas-Carmiol, Jorge Schupp, Harald T. Renner, Britta |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Koller, Julia E. Villinger, Karoline Lages, Nadine C. Absetz, Pilvikki Bamert, Melanie Branquinho, Cátia Sofia dos Santos Chaves-Avilés, Lourdes Dimitropoulou, Panagiota Fernández-Fernández, Ana Lucía Matos, Margarida Gaspar de Griskevica, Inguna Gutiérrez-Doña, Benicio Hankonen, Nelli Inauen, Jennifer Jordanova Peshevska, Dimitrinka Kassianos, Angelos P. Kolesnikova, Jelena Lavrič, Meta Mitanovska, Tamara Neter, Efrat Poštuvan, Vita Trups-Kalne, Ingrida Vargas-Carmiol, Jorge Schupp, Harald T. Renner, Britta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Collective measures Cross-amplification Cross-country differences Protective behavior Risk perception |
topic |
Collective measures Cross-amplification Cross-country differences Protective behavior Risk perception |
description |
© 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-20T15:56:39Z 2022 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/55469 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10451/55469 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;122:356-364 1201-9712 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.06.012 1878-3511 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134613880176640 |