SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.69.4.53 |
Resumo: | Syphilis is still today a major public health problem that requires prompt and appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis is mainly based on serological tests – non-treponemal and treponemal. In recent years there has been a major technological advance in this area with the development of several new methods that use specific treponemal antigens, including enzyme immunoassays (EIA), chemiluminescence (CA) and immunochromatografic. Al- though many of these tests have not yet obtained approval from relevant organizations, their performance (high sensi- tivity and specificity) and automation have led many laboratories to adopt an inverse algorithm to the classic algorithm to the screening for syphilis, (non-treponemal first). However, currently available data are insufficient to decide that one has clear advantages over the other. With this paper the authors intend to summarize the changes that the diagnosis of syphilis suffered in the past few ye- ars, particularly with the regard to serological screening, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of the new guidelines.KEYWORDS – Syphilis; Serologic Tests; Bacteriological Techniques; Syphilis Serodiagnosis; Guidelines. |
id |
RCAP_2f76188cebccb8769a48d7b20b6158d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/53 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINESDIAGNÓSTICO SEROLÓGICO DA SÍFILIS – NOVAS ORIENTAÇÕESSyphilis is still today a major public health problem that requires prompt and appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis is mainly based on serological tests – non-treponemal and treponemal. In recent years there has been a major technological advance in this area with the development of several new methods that use specific treponemal antigens, including enzyme immunoassays (EIA), chemiluminescence (CA) and immunochromatografic. Al- though many of these tests have not yet obtained approval from relevant organizations, their performance (high sensi- tivity and specificity) and automation have led many laboratories to adopt an inverse algorithm to the classic algorithm to the screening for syphilis, (non-treponemal first). However, currently available data are insufficient to decide that one has clear advantages over the other. With this paper the authors intend to summarize the changes that the diagnosis of syphilis suffered in the past few ye- ars, particularly with the regard to serological screening, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of the new guidelines.KEYWORDS – Syphilis; Serologic Tests; Bacteriological Techniques; Syphilis Serodiagnosis; Guidelines.A sífilis constitui ainda hoje um importante problema de saúde pública que requer diagnóstico e trata- mento atempados e adequados. O diagnóstico assenta fundamentalmente nos exames serológicos – treponémicos e não-treponémicos. Nos últimos anos tem-se assistido a um importante avanço tecnológico nesta área com o de- senvolvimento de vários novos métodos que utilizam antigénios treponémicos específicos, nomeadamente os testes imunoenzimáticos (EIA), de quemiluminiscência (CA) e imunocromatográficos. Apesar de muitos destes testes ainda não terem obtido a aprovação das organizações competentes, o seu desempenho (elevadas sensibilidade e especifi- cidade) e automatização levou muitos laboratórios a adoptar um algoritmo inverso ao algoritmo clássico no rastreio da sífilis, (teste não-treponémico inicial). No entanto, os dados disponíveis actualmente ainda são insuficientes para afirmar que um algoritmo tem claros benefícios sobre o outro. Com este trabalho as autoras pretendem resumir as mudanças que o diagnóstico da sífilis sofreu nos últimos anos, nomeadamente a nível do rastreio serológico, dando ênfase às vantagens e desvantagens das novas guidelines.PALAVRAS-CHAVE – Sífilis; Testes Serológicos; Serodiagnóstico da Sífilis; Guidelines.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2011-12-20T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.69.4.53oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/53Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 69 No 4 (2011): Outubro - Dezembro; 523Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 69 n. 4 (2011): Outubro - Dezembro; 5232182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/53https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.69.4.53https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/53/54Cruz, Maria JoãoLisboa, CarmenAzevedo, Filomenainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-06T12:34:37Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/53Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:10:39.239744Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES DIAGNÓSTICO SEROLÓGICO DA SÍFILIS – NOVAS ORIENTAÇÕES |
title |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES |
spellingShingle |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES Cruz, Maria João |
title_short |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES |
title_full |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES |
title_fullStr |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES |
title_full_unstemmed |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES |
title_sort |
SYPHILIS SEROLOGIC DIAGNOSIS – NEW GUIDELINES |
author |
Cruz, Maria João |
author_facet |
Cruz, Maria João Lisboa, Carmen Azevedo, Filomena |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lisboa, Carmen Azevedo, Filomena |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cruz, Maria João Lisboa, Carmen Azevedo, Filomena |
description |
Syphilis is still today a major public health problem that requires prompt and appropriate diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis is mainly based on serological tests – non-treponemal and treponemal. In recent years there has been a major technological advance in this area with the development of several new methods that use specific treponemal antigens, including enzyme immunoassays (EIA), chemiluminescence (CA) and immunochromatografic. Al- though many of these tests have not yet obtained approval from relevant organizations, their performance (high sensi- tivity and specificity) and automation have led many laboratories to adopt an inverse algorithm to the classic algorithm to the screening for syphilis, (non-treponemal first). However, currently available data are insufficient to decide that one has clear advantages over the other. With this paper the authors intend to summarize the changes that the diagnosis of syphilis suffered in the past few ye- ars, particularly with the regard to serological screening, emphasizing the advantages and disadvantages of the new guidelines.KEYWORDS – Syphilis; Serologic Tests; Bacteriological Techniques; Syphilis Serodiagnosis; Guidelines. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-12-20T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.69.4.53 oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/53 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.69.4.53 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/53 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/53 https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.69.4.53 https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/53/54 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 69 No 4 (2011): Outubro - Dezembro; 523 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 69 n. 4 (2011): Outubro - Dezembro; 523 2182-2409 2182-2395 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130563303440384 |