Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nogueira, Luísa
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Brandão, Sofia, Matos, Eduarda, Nunes, Rita Gouveia, Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre, Loureiro, Joana, Ramos, Isabel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/14952
Resumo: PURPOSE We aimed to compare two different methods of region of interest (ROI) demarcation and determine interobserver variability on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in breast lesions. METHODS Thirty-two patients with 39 lesions were evaluated with a 3.0 Tesla scanner using a diffusion-weighted sequence with several b-values. Two observers independently performed the ADC measurements using: 1) a small fixed area of 10 mm2 ROI within the area with highest restriction; 2) a large ROI so as to include the whole lesion. Differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon-rank test. Bland-Altman method and Spearman coefficient were applied for interobserver variability and correlation analysis. RESULTS ADC values measured using the two ROI demarcation methods were significantly different for both observers (P = 0.026; P = 0.033). There was no interobserver variability in ADC values using either method (large ROI, P = 0.21; small ROI, P = 0.64). ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly different between the two methods (P < 0.001). Variability in ADC was ≤0.008×10−3 mm2/s for both methods. When using the same method, ADC values were significantly correlated between the observers (small ROI: r=0.990, P < 0.001; large ROI: r=0.985, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The choice of ROI demarcation method influences ADC measurements. Small ROIs show less overlap in ADC values and higher ADC reproducibility, suggesting that this method may improve lesion discrimination. Interobserver variability was low for both methods.
id RCAP_31735ef1b38ead200a1a13069a49cd1d
oai_identifier_str oai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/14952
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variabilityBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsPURPOSE We aimed to compare two different methods of region of interest (ROI) demarcation and determine interobserver variability on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in breast lesions. METHODS Thirty-two patients with 39 lesions were evaluated with a 3.0 Tesla scanner using a diffusion-weighted sequence with several b-values. Two observers independently performed the ADC measurements using: 1) a small fixed area of 10 mm2 ROI within the area with highest restriction; 2) a large ROI so as to include the whole lesion. Differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon-rank test. Bland-Altman method and Spearman coefficient were applied for interobserver variability and correlation analysis. RESULTS ADC values measured using the two ROI demarcation methods were significantly different for both observers (P = 0.026; P = 0.033). There was no interobserver variability in ADC values using either method (large ROI, P = 0.21; small ROI, P = 0.64). ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly different between the two methods (P < 0.001). Variability in ADC was ≤0.008×10−3 mm2/s for both methods. When using the same method, ADC values were significantly correlated between the observers (small ROI: r=0.990, P < 0.001; large ROI: r=0.985, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The choice of ROI demarcation method influences ADC measurements. Small ROIs show less overlap in ADC values and higher ADC reproducibility, suggesting that this method may improve lesion discrimination. Interobserver variability was low for both methods.Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do PortoNogueira, LuísaBrandão, SofiaMatos, EduardaNunes, Rita GouveiaFerreira, Hugo AlexandreLoureiro, JoanaRamos, Isabel2019-11-26T13:45:41Z20152015-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/14952eng10.5152/dir.2014.14217info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-13T12:58:39Zoai:recipp.ipp.pt:10400.22/14952Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:34:45.254907Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
title Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
spellingShingle Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
Nogueira, Luísa
Breast Neoplasms
Diagnosis, Differential
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Reproducibility of Results
title_short Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
title_full Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
title_fullStr Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
title_full_unstemmed Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
title_sort Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability
author Nogueira, Luísa
author_facet Nogueira, Luísa
Brandão, Sofia
Matos, Eduarda
Nunes, Rita Gouveia
Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre
Loureiro, Joana
Ramos, Isabel
author_role author
author2 Brandão, Sofia
Matos, Eduarda
Nunes, Rita Gouveia
Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre
Loureiro, Joana
Ramos, Isabel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico do Porto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nogueira, Luísa
Brandão, Sofia
Matos, Eduarda
Nunes, Rita Gouveia
Ferreira, Hugo Alexandre
Loureiro, Joana
Ramos, Isabel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breast Neoplasms
Diagnosis, Differential
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Reproducibility of Results
topic Breast Neoplasms
Diagnosis, Differential
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Reproducibility of Results
description PURPOSE We aimed to compare two different methods of region of interest (ROI) demarcation and determine interobserver variability on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in breast lesions. METHODS Thirty-two patients with 39 lesions were evaluated with a 3.0 Tesla scanner using a diffusion-weighted sequence with several b-values. Two observers independently performed the ADC measurements using: 1) a small fixed area of 10 mm2 ROI within the area with highest restriction; 2) a large ROI so as to include the whole lesion. Differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon-rank test. Bland-Altman method and Spearman coefficient were applied for interobserver variability and correlation analysis. RESULTS ADC values measured using the two ROI demarcation methods were significantly different for both observers (P = 0.026; P = 0.033). There was no interobserver variability in ADC values using either method (large ROI, P = 0.21; small ROI, P = 0.64). ADC values of malignant lesions were significantly different between the two methods (P < 0.001). Variability in ADC was ≤0.008×10−3 mm2/s for both methods. When using the same method, ADC values were significantly correlated between the observers (small ROI: r=0.990, P < 0.001; large ROI: r=0.985, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The choice of ROI demarcation method influences ADC measurements. Small ROIs show less overlap in ADC values and higher ADC reproducibility, suggesting that this method may improve lesion discrimination. Interobserver variability was low for both methods.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-11-26T13:45:41Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/14952
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/14952
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.5152/dir.2014.14217
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131439720038400