Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Figueiredo, Maria do Carmo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Amendoeira, José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2.94
Resumo: ntroduction: One of the main challenges of nursing education is to expand the capacity of students to be health promoters in the 21st century. Scientific evidence suggests that the creation of a grand theme in the curricula of undergraduate and postgraduate courses would help give students skills and credibility related to Health Promotion (HP). Health Promotion (HP) includes determining factors such as the ecology, culture, socio-political context, and economy, which require systematic investigation and knowledge of HP. Objective: To describe and analyse the empirical studies on HP in nursing education and to highlight their results. Methods: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with PI[C]OD method to answer the following questions: What is taught about HP in nursing curricula? What are the meanings attributed by students when taught HP? The research was conducted in Portuguese and English and was restricted to the period between 2000-2009, in online databases, digital libraries, and open repositories of universities, following a systematic process from research to the critical appraisal of studies. The corpus for analysis consisted of eight qualitative studies, a systematic literature review of qualitative empirical studies, a Masters thesis with qualitative methodology, and a Ph.D. thesis with mixed methods. The participants were teachers and/or students. Results – Research findings conclude that teachers’ knowledge is weak concerning the substantive side of the curriculum. The content is focused on the activities of Health Education (HE) and skills are centred on prevention. The content is fragmented and there is no communication between modules. Students attribute different meanings, they consider HP to have little relevance to the real world experiences of nursing, showing a clear need for a specific teaching bock for the basic concepts, integrated blocks to add depth and to understand HP. They also feel they need concrete practical examples in order to reflect on the theory. The Master’s thesis showed that the students’ development of skills within the training and intervention of HP mainly refer to a categorisation paradigm focused on prevention. The PhD thesis points out that, in the nursing course, the predominant group of values of the HP program are the Pathogenic values. Conclusions: Given the demands on nurses as health promoters in the XXI century, and knowing that HP is a process with positive effects on citizens’ health, the patients themselves being participants in it, HP should be included in nursing curricula so that students can consolidate their knowledge and develop certain attitudes and skills. The development of curricula is focused on a traditional dominant paradigm of HE, although there is some experience in the constructivist paradigm of HP. The meanings attributed by the students to HP learning clearly reveal the traditional paradigm during theoretical and practical training. From this analysis three themes emerged: the knowledge of teachers in curriculum construction which encompasses the socio-political side, substantive side and socio-professional side; the knowledge of teachers on HP in curricular development include HP conceptual references, contents, and pedagogic strategies; and the meanings attributed by students to HP learning with the which include HP conceptual references, curriculum construction, curriculum operationalization, personal beliefs, pedagogic strategies, and experiences in the clinical practice.
id RCAP_33b5dece4bbff8ca1f820b552699e45f
oai_identifier_str oai:pensarenfermagem.esel.pt:article/94
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature reviewPromoção da saúde nos curricula de Enfermagem: conhecimento dos professores e significados atribuídos pelos estudantes: revisão sistemática da literaturahealth promotionnursing educationcurriculummeanings of learningpromoção da saúdeeducação em enfermagemcurrículosignificados sobre a aprendizagemntroduction: One of the main challenges of nursing education is to expand the capacity of students to be health promoters in the 21st century. Scientific evidence suggests that the creation of a grand theme in the curricula of undergraduate and postgraduate courses would help give students skills and credibility related to Health Promotion (HP). Health Promotion (HP) includes determining factors such as the ecology, culture, socio-political context, and economy, which require systematic investigation and knowledge of HP. Objective: To describe and analyse the empirical studies on HP in nursing education and to highlight their results. Methods: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with PI[C]OD method to answer the following questions: What is taught about HP in nursing curricula? What are the meanings attributed by students when taught HP? The research was conducted in Portuguese and English and was restricted to the period between 2000-2009, in online databases, digital libraries, and open repositories of universities, following a systematic process from research to the critical appraisal of studies. The corpus for analysis consisted of eight qualitative studies, a systematic literature review of qualitative empirical studies, a Masters thesis with qualitative methodology, and a Ph.D. thesis with mixed methods. The participants were teachers and/or students. Results – Research findings conclude that teachers’ knowledge is weak concerning the substantive side of the curriculum. The content is focused on the activities of Health Education (HE) and skills are centred on prevention. The content is fragmented and there is no communication between modules. Students attribute different meanings, they consider HP to have little relevance to the real world experiences of nursing, showing a clear need for a specific teaching bock for the basic concepts, integrated blocks to add depth and to understand HP. They also feel they need concrete practical examples in order to reflect on the theory. The Master’s thesis showed that the students’ development of skills within the training and intervention of HP mainly refer to a categorisation paradigm focused on prevention. The PhD thesis points out that, in the nursing course, the predominant group of values of the HP program are the Pathogenic values. Conclusions: Given the demands on nurses as health promoters in the XXI century, and knowing that HP is a process with positive effects on citizens’ health, the patients themselves being participants in it, HP should be included in nursing curricula so that students can consolidate their knowledge and develop certain attitudes and skills. The development of curricula is focused on a traditional dominant paradigm of HE, although there is some experience in the constructivist paradigm of HP. The meanings attributed by the students to HP learning clearly reveal the traditional paradigm during theoretical and practical training. From this analysis three themes emerged: the knowledge of teachers in curriculum construction which encompasses the socio-political side, substantive side and socio-professional side; the knowledge of teachers on HP in curricular development include HP conceptual references, contents, and pedagogic strategies; and the meanings attributed by students to HP learning with the which include HP conceptual references, curriculum construction, curriculum operationalization, personal beliefs, pedagogic strategies, and experiences in the clinical practice.Um dos principais desafios da educação em enfermagem é ampliar as capacidades dos estudantes para serem promotores de saúde no século XXI. A evidência científica defende, um grande tema visível nos curricula de graduação e pós-graduação, para formar profissionais com capacidade e credibilidade à luz da comunidade científica da Promoção da Saúde (PrS), com a inclusão dos determinantes de saúde, tais como aspetos, culturais, sociopolíticos e económicos, o que requer investigação sistemática e conhecimento da PrS. Objetivo: descrever e analisar estudos empíricos sobre a PrS na educação em enfermagem evidenciando os seus resultados. Método: Revisão sistemática da literatura pelo método PI[C]OD, a partir das questões: Qual a mobilização do conhecimento pelos professores sobre a PrS nos curricula de enfermagem? Quais os significados atribuídos pelos estudantes à aprendizagem da PrS? Pesquisa efetuada em português e inglês restrito ao período de 2000-2009, em bases de dados on-line; bibliotecas digitais e repositórios de universidades, seguindo um processo sistemático desde a pesquisa à avaliação crítica dos estudos. Constituíram o corpus para a análise, oito artigos e uma revisão sistemática de literatura, todos de natureza qualitativa, uma tese de mestrado com metodologia qualitativa e uma tese de doutoramento com estudo misto, sobre o fenómeno da PrS nos curricula de enfermagem, cujos participantes foram professores e/ou estudantes. Resultados – Os achados mostram que os conhecimentos dos professores são débeis na vertente substantiva do currículo. Os conteúdos são centrados nas atividades de Educação para a Saúde (EpS), e as competências na prevenção. Há fragmentação dos conteúdos e não há comunicação entre as disciplinas. Os estudantes consideram a PrS com pouca relevância nas experiências do mundo real da enfermagem manifestando necessidade de um módulo específico para os conceitos básicos; módulos integrados para aprofundamento e compreensão da PrS e expressam necessidade de exemplos concretos da prática para reflexão em teoria. Na tese de mestrado observámos que o desenvolvimento de competências pelos estudantes na formação e intervenção em PrS referem-se essencialmente a um paradigma de categorização, com ênfase na prevenção. A tese de doutoramento salienta que nos programas do curso de enfermagem, o eixo de valores da PrS predominante é o Patogénico. Conclusões – Face às exigências aos enfermeiros como promotores de saúde no século XXI, e sabendo que a PrS é um processo com efeitos positivos na saúde dos cidadãos enquanto sujeitos participativos na mesma, a PrS deverá ser incluída nos curricula em enfermagem para que os estudantes consolidem saberes, e desenvolvam atitudes e aptidões. O conhecimento dos professores sobre PrS na construção e desenvolvimento curricular focaliza-se num paradigma dominante tradicional de EpS embora haja algumas experiências do paradigma construtivista da PrS. Os significados atribuídos pelos estudantes à aprendizagem da PrS são reveladores do paradigma tradicional, na formação teórica e de estágio. Da análise emergiram três temas: conhecimento dos professores sobre a PrS na construção curricular com as categorias: vertente sociopolítica, vertente substantiva e vertente socioprofissional; Conhecimento dos professores sobre a PrS no desenvolvimento curricular com as categorias: referencial conceptual da PrS, conteúdos e estratégias pedagógicas; Significados atribuídos pelos estudantes à aprendizagem da PrS, com as categorias: referencial conceptual da PrS; construção curricular; operacionalização do currículo; crenças pessoais; estratégias pedagógicas; experiencias da prática clínica.Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa - ESEL/ CIDNUR2014-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2.94https://doi.org/10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2.94Pensar Enfermagem ; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2014): Journal of Nursing Pensar Enfermagem; 20-44Pensar Enfermagem ; Vol. 18 N.º 2 (2014): Revista Científica Pensar Enfermagem; 20-441647-55260873-890410.56732/pensarenf.v18i2reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://pensarenfermagem.esel.pt/index.php/esel/article/view/94https://pensarenfermagem.esel.pt/index.php/esel/article/view/94/89Figueiredo, Maria do CarmoAmendoeira, Joséinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-26T10:37:58Zoai:pensarenfermagem.esel.pt:article/94Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:31:10.176214Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
Promoção da saúde nos curricula de Enfermagem: conhecimento dos professores e significados atribuídos pelos estudantes: revisão sistemática da literatura
title Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
spellingShingle Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
Figueiredo, Maria do Carmo
health promotion
nursing education
curriculum
meanings of learning
promoção da saúde
educação em enfermagem
currículo
significados sobre a aprendizagem
title_short Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
title_full Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
title_fullStr Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
title_sort Health promotion in Nursing curricula: the knowledge of teachers and the meanings attributed by students: systematic literature review
author Figueiredo, Maria do Carmo
author_facet Figueiredo, Maria do Carmo
Amendoeira, José
author_role author
author2 Amendoeira, José
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Figueiredo, Maria do Carmo
Amendoeira, José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv health promotion
nursing education
curriculum
meanings of learning
promoção da saúde
educação em enfermagem
currículo
significados sobre a aprendizagem
topic health promotion
nursing education
curriculum
meanings of learning
promoção da saúde
educação em enfermagem
currículo
significados sobre a aprendizagem
description ntroduction: One of the main challenges of nursing education is to expand the capacity of students to be health promoters in the 21st century. Scientific evidence suggests that the creation of a grand theme in the curricula of undergraduate and postgraduate courses would help give students skills and credibility related to Health Promotion (HP). Health Promotion (HP) includes determining factors such as the ecology, culture, socio-political context, and economy, which require systematic investigation and knowledge of HP. Objective: To describe and analyse the empirical studies on HP in nursing education and to highlight their results. Methods: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with PI[C]OD method to answer the following questions: What is taught about HP in nursing curricula? What are the meanings attributed by students when taught HP? The research was conducted in Portuguese and English and was restricted to the period between 2000-2009, in online databases, digital libraries, and open repositories of universities, following a systematic process from research to the critical appraisal of studies. The corpus for analysis consisted of eight qualitative studies, a systematic literature review of qualitative empirical studies, a Masters thesis with qualitative methodology, and a Ph.D. thesis with mixed methods. The participants were teachers and/or students. Results – Research findings conclude that teachers’ knowledge is weak concerning the substantive side of the curriculum. The content is focused on the activities of Health Education (HE) and skills are centred on prevention. The content is fragmented and there is no communication between modules. Students attribute different meanings, they consider HP to have little relevance to the real world experiences of nursing, showing a clear need for a specific teaching bock for the basic concepts, integrated blocks to add depth and to understand HP. They also feel they need concrete practical examples in order to reflect on the theory. The Master’s thesis showed that the students’ development of skills within the training and intervention of HP mainly refer to a categorisation paradigm focused on prevention. The PhD thesis points out that, in the nursing course, the predominant group of values of the HP program are the Pathogenic values. Conclusions: Given the demands on nurses as health promoters in the XXI century, and knowing that HP is a process with positive effects on citizens’ health, the patients themselves being participants in it, HP should be included in nursing curricula so that students can consolidate their knowledge and develop certain attitudes and skills. The development of curricula is focused on a traditional dominant paradigm of HE, although there is some experience in the constructivist paradigm of HP. The meanings attributed by the students to HP learning clearly reveal the traditional paradigm during theoretical and practical training. From this analysis three themes emerged: the knowledge of teachers in curriculum construction which encompasses the socio-political side, substantive side and socio-professional side; the knowledge of teachers on HP in curricular development include HP conceptual references, contents, and pedagogic strategies; and the meanings attributed by students to HP learning with the which include HP conceptual references, curriculum construction, curriculum operationalization, personal beliefs, pedagogic strategies, and experiences in the clinical practice.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2.94
https://doi.org/10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2.94
url https://doi.org/10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2.94
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pensarenfermagem.esel.pt/index.php/esel/article/view/94
https://pensarenfermagem.esel.pt/index.php/esel/article/view/94/89
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa - ESEL/ CIDNUR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa - ESEL/ CIDNUR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pensar Enfermagem ; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2014): Journal of Nursing Pensar Enfermagem; 20-44
Pensar Enfermagem ; Vol. 18 N.º 2 (2014): Revista Científica Pensar Enfermagem; 20-44
1647-5526
0873-8904
10.56732/pensarenf.v18i2
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133580010455040