Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://web.esenfc.pt/?url=QrotphCO |
Resumo: | Aim: To analyze the empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese undergraduates. Background: Empathy is a fundamental skill for nursing practice and should be analyzed during the student's education. Methods: Descriptive study with cross-sectional design. Participants were 968 undergraduate students, including 215 (22.2%) Brazilians from a university in the state of Sa˜o Paulo and 753 (77.8%) Portuguese students from a higher education institution in central Portugal. The Portuguese and Brazilian versions of the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient have good internal consistency and reliability. Ethical considerations: In Brazil, approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sa˜o Paulo at Ribeira˜o Preto College of Nursing (protocol 191/2016) and in Portugal, from the Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Coimbra Higher School of Nursing (protocol P362-09/2016). Results: Most (86%) participants were female and aged between 20 and 24 years. In the general profile analysis between both groups, the domains "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes" scored higher. Gender differences exist for the feeling of empathy and systemizing, as women scored better on the short version of the Empathy Quotient and men on the Systemizing Quotient. Conclusion: As demonstrated in the domain scores for "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes," the undergraduate nursing students analyzed have the ability to deal intuitively and spontaneously with social situations; they are also characterized as methodical people, who like to follow rules, and experience practice better than theory, and the women have a higher empathetic level than men, who in turn are more systemizing. |
id |
RCAP_33b7f01a0b8a722a96217b3eef10550a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:10059 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduatesEmpathyinterpersonal relationsnursingSystemizing QuotientstudentsAim: To analyze the empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese undergraduates. Background: Empathy is a fundamental skill for nursing practice and should be analyzed during the student's education. Methods: Descriptive study with cross-sectional design. Participants were 968 undergraduate students, including 215 (22.2%) Brazilians from a university in the state of Sa˜o Paulo and 753 (77.8%) Portuguese students from a higher education institution in central Portugal. The Portuguese and Brazilian versions of the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient have good internal consistency and reliability. Ethical considerations: In Brazil, approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sa˜o Paulo at Ribeira˜o Preto College of Nursing (protocol 191/2016) and in Portugal, from the Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Coimbra Higher School of Nursing (protocol P362-09/2016). Results: Most (86%) participants were female and aged between 20 and 24 years. In the general profile analysis between both groups, the domains "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes" scored higher. Gender differences exist for the feeling of empathy and systemizing, as women scored better on the short version of the Empathy Quotient and men on the Systemizing Quotient. Conclusion: As demonstrated in the domain scores for "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes," the undergraduate nursing students analyzed have the ability to deal intuitively and spontaneously with social situations; they are also characterized as methodical people, who like to follow rules, and experience practice better than theory, and the women have a higher empathetic level than men, who in turn are more systemizing.SAGE Journal2020-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://web.esenfc.pt/?url=QrotphCOenghttp://web.esenfc.pt/?url=QrotphCOinfo:doi:10.1177/0969733019833132Oliveira, Luís Miguel Nunes deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-07-16T00:00:00Zoai:repositorio.esenfc.pt:10059Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:12:56.551451Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
title |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
spellingShingle |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates Oliveira, Luís Miguel Nunes de Empathy interpersonal relations nursing Systemizing Quotient students |
title_short |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
title_full |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
title_fullStr |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
title_sort |
Empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese nursing undergraduates |
author |
Oliveira, Luís Miguel Nunes de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Luís Miguel Nunes de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Luís Miguel Nunes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Empathy interpersonal relations nursing Systemizing Quotient students |
topic |
Empathy interpersonal relations nursing Systemizing Quotient students |
description |
Aim: To analyze the empathizing and systemizing profiles of Brazilian and Portuguese undergraduates. Background: Empathy is a fundamental skill for nursing practice and should be analyzed during the student's education. Methods: Descriptive study with cross-sectional design. Participants were 968 undergraduate students, including 215 (22.2%) Brazilians from a university in the state of Sa˜o Paulo and 753 (77.8%) Portuguese students from a higher education institution in central Portugal. The Portuguese and Brazilian versions of the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient have good internal consistency and reliability. Ethical considerations: In Brazil, approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Sa˜o Paulo at Ribeira˜o Preto College of Nursing (protocol 191/2016) and in Portugal, from the Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Coimbra Higher School of Nursing (protocol P362-09/2016). Results: Most (86%) participants were female and aged between 20 and 24 years. In the general profile analysis between both groups, the domains "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes" scored higher. Gender differences exist for the feeling of empathy and systemizing, as women scored better on the short version of the Empathy Quotient and men on the Systemizing Quotient. Conclusion: As demonstrated in the domain scores for "Social Skills," "Contents," and "Processes," the undergraduate nursing students analyzed have the ability to deal intuitively and spontaneously with social situations; they are also characterized as methodical people, who like to follow rules, and experience practice better than theory, and the women have a higher empathetic level than men, who in turn are more systemizing. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://web.esenfc.pt/?url=QrotphCO |
url |
http://web.esenfc.pt/?url=QrotphCO |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://web.esenfc.pt/?url=QrotphCO info:doi:10.1177/0969733019833132 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Journal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Journal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817550728149860352 |