Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Pedro Santos, Cunha, Marisa, Vaz, Rui, Pereira, Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/25502
Resumo: Background: Patients' recall of their preoperative status is seldom used to assess surgical outcomes because of concerns of inaccuracy and bias. Objective: The present study aims to measure the significance of this recall bias and its repercussion on patients' recollection of their preoperative status. Methods: Patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine diseases during the period of one year (n=198) were included in this study. EQ-5D (including EQ VAS), COMI Neck (including Neck Pain and Shoulder/Arm Pain NRS), COMI Back (including Back Pain and Buttock/Leg Pain NRS), NDI and ODI were completed preoperatively. One year after surgery, patients were asked to complete 2 sets of the same questionnaires, one regarding their postoperative status and the other one regarding their recall of the preoperative status. Results: There was poor to moderate agreement between recalled and collected preoperative scores for all PROMs. Patients' recollection of their preoperative status was accurate for patients who underwent cervical spine surgery, but not after lumbar spine surgery. Patients satisfied with the outcome after lumbar spine surgery recalled significantly worse scores compared to the preoperatively collected. Conclusions: Using patients' recall of their preoperative status may lead to an overestimation of the surgery effectiveness, particularly for lumbar spine surgery. The self-assessed surgery effectiveness interferes with the recollection of the baseline status.
id RCAP_376bdf341d052baa6abfc535c5201335
oai_identifier_str oai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/25502
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?Treatment OutcomePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and Questionnairesdegenerative spine diseasespatient recallrecall biasspine surgeryBackground: Patients' recall of their preoperative status is seldom used to assess surgical outcomes because of concerns of inaccuracy and bias. Objective: The present study aims to measure the significance of this recall bias and its repercussion on patients' recollection of their preoperative status. Methods: Patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine diseases during the period of one year (n=198) were included in this study. EQ-5D (including EQ VAS), COMI Neck (including Neck Pain and Shoulder/Arm Pain NRS), COMI Back (including Back Pain and Buttock/Leg Pain NRS), NDI and ODI were completed preoperatively. One year after surgery, patients were asked to complete 2 sets of the same questionnaires, one regarding their postoperative status and the other one regarding their recall of the preoperative status. Results: There was poor to moderate agreement between recalled and collected preoperative scores for all PROMs. Patients' recollection of their preoperative status was accurate for patients who underwent cervical spine surgery, but not after lumbar spine surgery. Patients satisfied with the outcome after lumbar spine surgery recalled significantly worse scores compared to the preoperatively collected. Conclusions: Using patients' recall of their preoperative status may lead to an overestimation of the surgery effectiveness, particularly for lumbar spine surgery. The self-assessed surgery effectiveness interferes with the recollection of the baseline status.Repositório ComumRodrigues, RicardoSilva, Pedro SantosCunha, MarisaVaz, RuiPereira, Paulo2019-01-03T23:54:59Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/25502eng10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.174info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-20T11:08:16Zoai:comum.rcaap.pt:10400.26/25502Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:49:03.798109Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
title Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
spellingShingle Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
Rodrigues, Ricardo
Treatment Outcome
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
degenerative spine diseases
patient recall
recall bias
spine surgery
title_short Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
title_full Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
title_fullStr Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
title_full_unstemmed Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
title_sort Can We Assess the Success of Surgery for Degenerative Spinal Diseases Using Patients' Recall of Their Preoperative Status?
author Rodrigues, Ricardo
author_facet Rodrigues, Ricardo
Silva, Pedro Santos
Cunha, Marisa
Vaz, Rui
Pereira, Paulo
author_role author
author2 Silva, Pedro Santos
Cunha, Marisa
Vaz, Rui
Pereira, Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Comum
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Ricardo
Silva, Pedro Santos
Cunha, Marisa
Vaz, Rui
Pereira, Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Treatment Outcome
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
degenerative spine diseases
patient recall
recall bias
spine surgery
topic Treatment Outcome
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
degenerative spine diseases
patient recall
recall bias
spine surgery
description Background: Patients' recall of their preoperative status is seldom used to assess surgical outcomes because of concerns of inaccuracy and bias. Objective: The present study aims to measure the significance of this recall bias and its repercussion on patients' recollection of their preoperative status. Methods: Patients submitted to surgery due to degenerative spine diseases during the period of one year (n=198) were included in this study. EQ-5D (including EQ VAS), COMI Neck (including Neck Pain and Shoulder/Arm Pain NRS), COMI Back (including Back Pain and Buttock/Leg Pain NRS), NDI and ODI were completed preoperatively. One year after surgery, patients were asked to complete 2 sets of the same questionnaires, one regarding their postoperative status and the other one regarding their recall of the preoperative status. Results: There was poor to moderate agreement between recalled and collected preoperative scores for all PROMs. Patients' recollection of their preoperative status was accurate for patients who underwent cervical spine surgery, but not after lumbar spine surgery. Patients satisfied with the outcome after lumbar spine surgery recalled significantly worse scores compared to the preoperatively collected. Conclusions: Using patients' recall of their preoperative status may lead to an overestimation of the surgery effectiveness, particularly for lumbar spine surgery. The self-assessed surgery effectiveness interferes with the recollection of the baseline status.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
2019-01-03T23:54:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/25502
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/25502
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.174
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130356390035456