Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396 |
Resumo: | Perceptions of organisational culture made by three categories of staff playing managerial roles in each of two Portuguese Universities (one public and the other private) were compared using a questionnaire adapted from the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and translated into Portuguese. The four scales of the questionnaire, designed to measure the Cultures of Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy and Market orientation were found to have adequate internal reliabilities, though a factor analysis raised doubts about the construct (factor) validity of two of the scales (Clan and Adhocracy). Application of a MANOVA to scores on the four scales of organisational culture showed, as hypothesised, that the private university was perceived to have significantly stronger cultures of Market orientation and Hierarchy than the public university. No overall difference was found between the universities for the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy. However, general managerial staff in both Universities perceived the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy to be stronger than was the case for technical managerial staff. |
id |
RCAP_386d0ba23ad72a00fbf08f3610d55748 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/13396 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case studyOrganisational cultureAssessmentPortuguese higher educationCompeting valuesManagerial rolePerceptions of organisational culture made by three categories of staff playing managerial roles in each of two Portuguese Universities (one public and the other private) were compared using a questionnaire adapted from the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and translated into Portuguese. The four scales of the questionnaire, designed to measure the Cultures of Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy and Market orientation were found to have adequate internal reliabilities, though a factor analysis raised doubts about the construct (factor) validity of two of the scales (Clan and Adhocracy). Application of a MANOVA to scores on the four scales of organisational culture showed, as hypothesised, that the private university was perceived to have significantly stronger cultures of Market orientation and Hierarchy than the public university. No overall difference was found between the universities for the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy. However, general managerial staff in both Universities perceived the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy to be stronger than was the case for technical managerial staff.Kluwer Academic Publishers2017-05-16T15:00:45Z2008-01-01T00:00:00Z20082017-05-16T14:57:54Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396eng0018-156010.1007/s10734-007-9080-6Ferreira, A.Hill, M. M.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T02:40:15Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/13396Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T02:40:15Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
title |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
spellingShingle |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study Ferreira, A. Organisational culture Assessment Portuguese higher education Competing values Managerial role |
title_short |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
title_full |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
title_fullStr |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
title_sort |
Organisational cultures in public and private Portuguese universities: a case study |
author |
Ferreira, A. |
author_facet |
Ferreira, A. Hill, M. M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hill, M. M. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, A. Hill, M. M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Organisational culture Assessment Portuguese higher education Competing values Managerial role |
topic |
Organisational culture Assessment Portuguese higher education Competing values Managerial role |
description |
Perceptions of organisational culture made by three categories of staff playing managerial roles in each of two Portuguese Universities (one public and the other private) were compared using a questionnaire adapted from the Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument and translated into Portuguese. The four scales of the questionnaire, designed to measure the Cultures of Clan, Adhocracy, Hierarchy and Market orientation were found to have adequate internal reliabilities, though a factor analysis raised doubts about the construct (factor) validity of two of the scales (Clan and Adhocracy). Application of a MANOVA to scores on the four scales of organisational culture showed, as hypothesised, that the private university was perceived to have significantly stronger cultures of Market orientation and Hierarchy than the public university. No overall difference was found between the universities for the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy. However, general managerial staff in both Universities perceived the cultures of Clan and Adhocracy to be stronger than was the case for technical managerial staff. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z 2008 2017-05-16T15:00:45Z 2017-05-16T14:57:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396 |
url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-10423 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/13396 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0018-1560 10.1007/s10734-007-9080-6 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Kluwer Academic Publishers |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Kluwer Academic Publishers |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817546291186499584 |