A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7 |
Resumo: | Although the deontic, responsibility/caring, and aretaic moralities have been extensively investigated, the relation among them, namely the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and responsibility moralities, have rarely been studied. To fill in this gap is the main goal of this study. In the first part, we set the context for the study of the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and caring moralities, while arguing that Kohlberg’s theory is mainly a deontic moral theory. Second, we elaborate on the reasons why Kohlberg did not introduce an aretaic morality into his theory. Third, we show that Kohlberg’s reasons to exclude this type of morality from his moral theory are problematic. Fourth, we argue that much could be gained if moral psychology took the aretaic morality and its relation to the deontic and caring/responsibility moralities into account. Fifth, we present the main findings of an exploratory research on preadolescents’ (n = 32) and adolescents’ (n = 32) deontic, aretaic and responsibility evaluations of hypothetical actions, and analyze the relations among these evaluations. Finally, we summarize the main ideas of this study; refer to some of its limitations; point to some examples for future research; and claim that our suggestion of an aretaic-deontic-responsibility model may contribute to the understanding of one’s moral functioning. However, this suggestion requires further methodological and empirical efforts. |
id |
RCAP_3b52a4d85b6d4571f2ef08c0cd10b805 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:impactum-journals.uc.pt:article/7544 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility MoralitiesUma súplica pelo estudo da relação entre a Moralidade Aretaica e as Moralidades Deôntica e de Responsabilidadearetaic moralitydeontic moralitycaring moralitymoral functioningKohlbergmoralidade aretaicamoralidade deônticamoralidade da responsabilidadefuncionamento moralKohlbergAlthough the deontic, responsibility/caring, and aretaic moralities have been extensively investigated, the relation among them, namely the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and responsibility moralities, have rarely been studied. To fill in this gap is the main goal of this study. In the first part, we set the context for the study of the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and caring moralities, while arguing that Kohlberg’s theory is mainly a deontic moral theory. Second, we elaborate on the reasons why Kohlberg did not introduce an aretaic morality into his theory. Third, we show that Kohlberg’s reasons to exclude this type of morality from his moral theory are problematic. Fourth, we argue that much could be gained if moral psychology took the aretaic morality and its relation to the deontic and caring/responsibility moralities into account. Fifth, we present the main findings of an exploratory research on preadolescents’ (n = 32) and adolescents’ (n = 32) deontic, aretaic and responsibility evaluations of hypothetical actions, and analyze the relations among these evaluations. Finally, we summarize the main ideas of this study; refer to some of its limitations; point to some examples for future research; and claim that our suggestion of an aretaic-deontic-responsibility model may contribute to the understanding of one’s moral functioning. However, this suggestion requires further methodological and empirical efforts.Embora as moralidades deôntica, aretaica e de responsabilidade tenham sido muito investigadas, a relação entre elas, nomeadamente a relação entre a moralidade aretaica e as moralidades deôntica e de responsabilidade, têm sido raramente estudadas. Estudar esta última relação é o principal objetivo deste estudo. Na 1ª parte, estabelecemos o contexto para o estudo desta relação, enquanto argumentamos que a teoria de Kohlberg é, acima de tudo, uma teoria sobre a moralidade deôntica. Na 2ª parte, elaboramos sobre as razões que levaram Kohlberg a não introduzir uma moralidade aretaica na sua teoria sobre a moralidade. Na 3ª parte, mostramos que tais razões são problemáticas. Na 4ª parte, argumentamos que há muito a ganhar se a psicologia da moralidade tiver em conta a moralidade aretaica e as suas relações com a moralidade deôntica e a moralidade da responsabilidade ou do cuidar. Na 5ª parte, apresentamos os resultados principais de uma pesquisa exploratória sobre as avaliações dêonticas, aretaicas e de responsabilidade feitas por um grupo de pré-adolescentes (n = 32) e adolescentes (n = 32) relativas a acções hipotéticas, e analisamos as relações entre tais avaliações. Finalmente, sumarizamos as principais ideias deste estudo; referimo-nos a algumas das suas limitações; sugerimos exemplos de investigações futuras; e argumentamos que as relações entre estes três tipos de moralidade podem constituir um modelo, o modelo aretaico, deôntico e de responsabilidade, que nos ajude a compreender a transição da cognição moral para a acção moral. No entanto, esta sugestão requere mais investigação metodológica e empírica.Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra2019-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7Psychologica; Vol. 62 No. 2 (2019); 117-142Psychologica; Vol. 62 N.º 2 (2019); 117-1421647-86060871-465710.14195/1647-8606_62-2reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7/5981Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Psychologicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLourenço, Orlando M.2023-05-31T13:59:46Zoai:impactum-journals.uc.pt:article/7544Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:58:19.578914Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities Uma súplica pelo estudo da relação entre a Moralidade Aretaica e as Moralidades Deôntica e de Responsabilidade |
title |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities |
spellingShingle |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities Lourenço, Orlando M. aretaic morality deontic morality caring morality moral functioning Kohlberg moralidade aretaica moralidade deôntica moralidade da responsabilidade funcionamento moral Kohlberg |
title_short |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities |
title_full |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities |
title_fullStr |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities |
title_full_unstemmed |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities |
title_sort |
A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities |
author |
Lourenço, Orlando M. |
author_facet |
Lourenço, Orlando M. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço, Orlando M. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
aretaic morality deontic morality caring morality moral functioning Kohlberg moralidade aretaica moralidade deôntica moralidade da responsabilidade funcionamento moral Kohlberg |
topic |
aretaic morality deontic morality caring morality moral functioning Kohlberg moralidade aretaica moralidade deôntica moralidade da responsabilidade funcionamento moral Kohlberg |
description |
Although the deontic, responsibility/caring, and aretaic moralities have been extensively investigated, the relation among them, namely the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and responsibility moralities, have rarely been studied. To fill in this gap is the main goal of this study. In the first part, we set the context for the study of the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and caring moralities, while arguing that Kohlberg’s theory is mainly a deontic moral theory. Second, we elaborate on the reasons why Kohlberg did not introduce an aretaic morality into his theory. Third, we show that Kohlberg’s reasons to exclude this type of morality from his moral theory are problematic. Fourth, we argue that much could be gained if moral psychology took the aretaic morality and its relation to the deontic and caring/responsibility moralities into account. Fifth, we present the main findings of an exploratory research on preadolescents’ (n = 32) and adolescents’ (n = 32) deontic, aretaic and responsibility evaluations of hypothetical actions, and analyze the relations among these evaluations. Finally, we summarize the main ideas of this study; refer to some of its limitations; point to some examples for future research; and claim that our suggestion of an aretaic-deontic-responsibility model may contribute to the understanding of one’s moral functioning. However, this suggestion requires further methodological and empirical efforts. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-18 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7 https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7 https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7/5981 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Psychologica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Psychologica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Psychologica; Vol. 62 No. 2 (2019); 117-142 Psychologica; Vol. 62 N.º 2 (2019); 117-142 1647-8606 0871-4657 10.14195/1647-8606_62-2 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1817553309020454912 |