A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lourenço, Orlando M.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7
Resumo: Although the deontic, responsibility/caring, and aretaic moralities have been extensively investigated, the relation among them, namely the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and responsibility moralities, have rarely been studied. To fill in this gap is the main goal of this study. In the first part, we set the context for the study of the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and caring moralities, while arguing that Kohlberg’s theory is mainly a deontic moral theory. Second, we elaborate on the reasons why Kohlberg did not introduce an aretaic morality into his theory. Third, we show that Kohlberg’s reasons to exclude this type of morality from his moral theory are problematic. Fourth, we argue that much could be gained if moral psychology took the aretaic morality and its relation to the deontic and caring/responsibility moralities into account. Fifth, we present the main findings of an exploratory research on preadolescents’ (n = 32) and adolescents’ (n = 32) deontic, aretaic and responsibility evaluations of hypothetical actions, and analyze the relations among these evaluations. Finally, we summarize the main ideas of this study; refer to some of its limitations; point to some examples for future research; and claim that our suggestion of an aretaic-deontic-responsibility model may contribute to the understanding of one’s moral functioning. However, this suggestion requires further methodological and empirical efforts.
id RCAP_3b52a4d85b6d4571f2ef08c0cd10b805
oai_identifier_str oai:impactum-journals.uc.pt:article/7544
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility MoralitiesUma súplica pelo estudo da relação entre a Moralidade Aretaica e as Moralidades Deôntica e de Responsabilidadearetaic moralitydeontic moralitycaring moralitymoral functioningKohlbergmoralidade aretaicamoralidade deônticamoralidade da responsabilidadefuncionamento moralKohlbergAlthough the deontic, responsibility/caring, and aretaic moralities have been extensively investigated, the relation among them, namely the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and responsibility moralities, have rarely been studied. To fill in this gap is the main goal of this study. In the first part, we set the context for the study of the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and caring moralities, while arguing that Kohlberg’s theory is mainly a deontic moral theory. Second, we elaborate on the reasons why Kohlberg did not introduce an aretaic morality into his theory. Third, we show that Kohlberg’s reasons to exclude this type of morality from his moral theory are problematic. Fourth, we argue that much could be gained if moral psychology took the aretaic morality and its relation to the deontic and caring/responsibility moralities into account. Fifth, we present the main findings of an exploratory research on preadolescents’ (n = 32) and adolescents’ (n = 32) deontic, aretaic and responsibility evaluations of hypothetical actions, and analyze the relations among these evaluations. Finally, we summarize the main ideas of this study; refer to some of its limitations; point to some examples for future research; and claim that our suggestion of an aretaic-deontic-responsibility model may contribute to the understanding of one’s moral functioning. However, this suggestion requires further methodological and empirical efforts.Embora as moralidades deôntica, aretaica e de responsabilidade tenham sido muito investigadas, a relação entre elas, nomeadamente a relação entre a moralidade aretaica e as moralidades deôntica e de responsabilidade, têm sido raramente estudadas. Estudar esta última relação é o principal objetivo deste estudo. Na 1ª parte, estabelecemos o contexto para o estudo desta relação, enquanto argumentamos que a teoria de Kohlberg é, acima de tudo, uma teoria sobre a moralidade deôntica. Na 2ª parte, elaboramos sobre as razões que levaram Kohlberg a não introduzir uma moralidade aretaica na sua teoria sobre a moralidade. Na 3ª parte, mostramos que tais razões são problemáticas. Na 4ª parte, argumentamos que há muito a ganhar se a psicologia da moralidade tiver em conta a moralidade aretaica e as suas relações com a moralidade deôntica e a moralidade da responsabilidade ou do cuidar. Na 5ª parte, apresentamos os resultados principais de uma pesquisa exploratória sobre as avaliações dêonticas, aretaicas e de responsabilidade feitas por um grupo de pré-adolescentes (n = 32) e adolescentes (n = 32) relativas a acções hipotéticas, e analisamos as relações entre tais avaliações. Finalmente, sumarizamos as principais ideias deste estudo; referimo-nos a algumas das suas limitações; sugerimos exemplos de investigações futuras; e argumentamos que as relações entre estes três tipos de moralidade podem constituir um modelo, o modelo aretaico, deôntico e de responsabilidade, que nos ajude a compreender a transição da cognição moral para a acção moral. No entanto, esta sugestão requere mais investigação metodológica e empírica.Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra2019-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7Psychologica; Vol. 62 No. 2 (2019); 117-142Psychologica; Vol. 62 N.º 2 (2019); 117-1421647-86060871-465710.14195/1647-8606_62-2reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7/5981Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Psychologicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLourenço, Orlando M.2023-05-31T13:59:46Zoai:impactum-journals.uc.pt:article/7544Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:58:19.578914Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
Uma súplica pelo estudo da relação entre a Moralidade Aretaica e as Moralidades Deôntica e de Responsabilidade
title A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
spellingShingle A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
Lourenço, Orlando M.
aretaic morality
deontic morality
caring morality
moral functioning
Kohlberg
moralidade aretaica
moralidade deôntica
moralidade da responsabilidade
funcionamento moral
Kohlberg
title_short A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
title_full A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
title_fullStr A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
title_full_unstemmed A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
title_sort A plea for the study of the relation between the Aretaic Morality and the Deontic and Responsibility Moralities
author Lourenço, Orlando M.
author_facet Lourenço, Orlando M.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lourenço, Orlando M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv aretaic morality
deontic morality
caring morality
moral functioning
Kohlberg
moralidade aretaica
moralidade deôntica
moralidade da responsabilidade
funcionamento moral
Kohlberg
topic aretaic morality
deontic morality
caring morality
moral functioning
Kohlberg
moralidade aretaica
moralidade deôntica
moralidade da responsabilidade
funcionamento moral
Kohlberg
description Although the deontic, responsibility/caring, and aretaic moralities have been extensively investigated, the relation among them, namely the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and responsibility moralities, have rarely been studied. To fill in this gap is the main goal of this study. In the first part, we set the context for the study of the relation between the aretaic and the deontic and caring moralities, while arguing that Kohlberg’s theory is mainly a deontic moral theory. Second, we elaborate on the reasons why Kohlberg did not introduce an aretaic morality into his theory. Third, we show that Kohlberg’s reasons to exclude this type of morality from his moral theory are problematic. Fourth, we argue that much could be gained if moral psychology took the aretaic morality and its relation to the deontic and caring/responsibility moralities into account. Fifth, we present the main findings of an exploratory research on preadolescents’ (n = 32) and adolescents’ (n = 32) deontic, aretaic and responsibility evaluations of hypothetical actions, and analyze the relations among these evaluations. Finally, we summarize the main ideas of this study; refer to some of its limitations; point to some examples for future research; and claim that our suggestion of an aretaic-deontic-responsibility model may contribute to the understanding of one’s moral functioning. However, this suggestion requires further methodological and empirical efforts.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-18
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7
https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7
url https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_62-2_7
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7
https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/psychologica/article/view/1647-8606_62-2_7/5981
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Psychologica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2019 Psychologica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psychologica; Vol. 62 No. 2 (2019); 117-142
Psychologica; Vol. 62 N.º 2 (2019); 117-142
1647-8606
0871-4657
10.14195/1647-8606_62-2
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131654268125184