Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87606 |
Resumo: | This scoping review examines the research landscape about publics’ views on the ethical challenges of AI. To elucidate how the concerns voiced by the publics are translated within the research domain, this study scrutinizes 64 publications sourced from PubMed® and Web of ScienceTM. The central inquiry revolves around discerning the motivations, stakehold- ers, and ethical quandaries that emerge in research on this topic. The analysis reveals that innovation and legitimation stand out as the primary impetuses for engaging the public in deliberations concerning the ethical dilemmas associated with AI technologies. Supplementary motives are rooted in educational endeavors, democratization initiatives, and inspirational pursuits, whereas politicization emerges as a comparatively infrequent incentive. The study participants predominantly comprise the general public and professional groups, followed by AI system developers, industry and business manag- ers, students, scholars, consumers, and policymakers. The ethical dimensions most commonly explored in the literature encompass human agency and oversight, followed by issues centered on privacy and data governance. Conversely, topics related to diversity, nondiscrimination, fairness, societal and environmental well-being, technical robustness, safety, trans- parency, and accountability receive comparatively less attention. This paper delineates the concrete operationalization of calls for public involvement in AI governance within the research sphere. It underscores the intricate interplay between ethical concerns, public involvement, and societal structures, including political and economic agendas, which serve to bolster technical proficiency and affirm the legitimacy of AI development in accordance with the institutional norms that underlie responsible research practices. |
id |
RCAP_3dfdb3bbda5053580095e6a69b12103a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/87606 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping reviewResponsible researchPublic views'Artificial intelligenceEthicsMotivationsPublic involvementLegitimacyCiências Sociais::SociologiaThis scoping review examines the research landscape about publics’ views on the ethical challenges of AI. To elucidate how the concerns voiced by the publics are translated within the research domain, this study scrutinizes 64 publications sourced from PubMed® and Web of ScienceTM. The central inquiry revolves around discerning the motivations, stakehold- ers, and ethical quandaries that emerge in research on this topic. The analysis reveals that innovation and legitimation stand out as the primary impetuses for engaging the public in deliberations concerning the ethical dilemmas associated with AI technologies. Supplementary motives are rooted in educational endeavors, democratization initiatives, and inspirational pursuits, whereas politicization emerges as a comparatively infrequent incentive. The study participants predominantly comprise the general public and professional groups, followed by AI system developers, industry and business manag- ers, students, scholars, consumers, and policymakers. The ethical dimensions most commonly explored in the literature encompass human agency and oversight, followed by issues centered on privacy and data governance. Conversely, topics related to diversity, nondiscrimination, fairness, societal and environmental well-being, technical robustness, safety, trans- parency, and accountability receive comparatively less attention. This paper delineates the concrete operationalization of calls for public involvement in AI governance within the research sphere. It underscores the intricate interplay between ethical concerns, public involvement, and societal structures, including political and economic agendas, which serve to bolster technical proficiency and affirm the legitimacy of AI development in accordance with the institutional norms that underlie responsible research practices.Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on).SpringerUniversidade do MinhoMachado, HelenaSilva, SusanaNeiva, Laura2023-12-192023-12-19T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/87606engMachado, H., Silva, S., & Neiva, L. (2023). Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review. AI and Ethics.2730-59532730-596110.1007/s43681-023-00387-1https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-023-00387-1.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-12-30T01:30:20Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/87606Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:55:36.082734Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
title |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review Machado, Helena Responsible research Public views' Artificial intelligence Ethics Motivations Public involvement Legitimacy Ciências Sociais::Sociologia |
title_short |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
title_full |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
title_sort |
Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review |
author |
Machado, Helena |
author_facet |
Machado, Helena Silva, Susana Neiva, Laura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Susana Neiva, Laura |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Machado, Helena Silva, Susana Neiva, Laura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Responsible research Public views' Artificial intelligence Ethics Motivations Public involvement Legitimacy Ciências Sociais::Sociologia |
topic |
Responsible research Public views' Artificial intelligence Ethics Motivations Public involvement Legitimacy Ciências Sociais::Sociologia |
description |
This scoping review examines the research landscape about publics’ views on the ethical challenges of AI. To elucidate how the concerns voiced by the publics are translated within the research domain, this study scrutinizes 64 publications sourced from PubMed® and Web of ScienceTM. The central inquiry revolves around discerning the motivations, stakehold- ers, and ethical quandaries that emerge in research on this topic. The analysis reveals that innovation and legitimation stand out as the primary impetuses for engaging the public in deliberations concerning the ethical dilemmas associated with AI technologies. Supplementary motives are rooted in educational endeavors, democratization initiatives, and inspirational pursuits, whereas politicization emerges as a comparatively infrequent incentive. The study participants predominantly comprise the general public and professional groups, followed by AI system developers, industry and business manag- ers, students, scholars, consumers, and policymakers. The ethical dimensions most commonly explored in the literature encompass human agency and oversight, followed by issues centered on privacy and data governance. Conversely, topics related to diversity, nondiscrimination, fairness, societal and environmental well-being, technical robustness, safety, trans- parency, and accountability receive comparatively less attention. This paper delineates the concrete operationalization of calls for public involvement in AI governance within the research sphere. It underscores the intricate interplay between ethical concerns, public involvement, and societal structures, including political and economic agendas, which serve to bolster technical proficiency and affirm the legitimacy of AI development in accordance with the institutional norms that underlie responsible research practices. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-19 2023-12-19T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87606 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/87606 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Machado, H., Silva, S., & Neiva, L. (2023). Publics’ views on ethical challenges of artificial intelligence: a scoping review. AI and Ethics. 2730-5953 2730-5961 10.1007/s43681-023-00387-1 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-023-00387-1.pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136442756104192 |