Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Archenti,Nélida
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Johnson,Niki
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292006000300007
Resumo: This article sets out to explore the effects of the quota law by comparing the composition by sex of the legislatures and the legislative activity of women MPs in Argentina and Uruguay since 1993 to 2003 (first ten years with quotas in Argentina). In 1991 Argentina became the first country in the world to establish by law a quota system that guarantees women’s access to parliament. This institutional reform produced an important impact on many countries of Latin America which sanctioned similar laws. In contrast, in 2003 Uruguay failed to pass the third bill presented since 1988 proposing the introduction of a similar quota system, and remains one of the few countries in the Region that has not introduced a quota law. At the present, Argentine women deputies comprise over a third of members of the Chamber of Representatives, while just 11 per cent of members of the Uruguayan Chamber of Deputies are women. The main objective of this paper is to undertake a comparative study of the Argentinean and Uruguayan cases based on an analysis of women MPs’ parliamentary activity, focusing on the bills they present, in order to identify effects of quotas on the design of parliamentary gender agenda. The central hypothesis is that quotas have an outstanding influence engendering legislative agenda however other relevant factors must be taken into account in order to understand the whole process. These would contribute to the comprehension of the presence of a clear gender agenda in the Uruguayan case. These other variables include levels of gender awareness among female deputies and inter-party networking around a gender legislative agenda.
id RCAP_4099aa88f0b57482bef5880a106441f0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0873-65292006000300007
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguaypolitical representationgenderquotasLatin AmericaThis article sets out to explore the effects of the quota law by comparing the composition by sex of the legislatures and the legislative activity of women MPs in Argentina and Uruguay since 1993 to 2003 (first ten years with quotas in Argentina). In 1991 Argentina became the first country in the world to establish by law a quota system that guarantees women’s access to parliament. This institutional reform produced an important impact on many countries of Latin America which sanctioned similar laws. In contrast, in 2003 Uruguay failed to pass the third bill presented since 1988 proposing the introduction of a similar quota system, and remains one of the few countries in the Region that has not introduced a quota law. At the present, Argentine women deputies comprise over a third of members of the Chamber of Representatives, while just 11 per cent of members of the Uruguayan Chamber of Deputies are women. The main objective of this paper is to undertake a comparative study of the Argentinean and Uruguayan cases based on an analysis of women MPs’ parliamentary activity, focusing on the bills they present, in order to identify effects of quotas on the design of parliamentary gender agenda. The central hypothesis is that quotas have an outstanding influence engendering legislative agenda however other relevant factors must be taken into account in order to understand the whole process. These would contribute to the comprehension of the presence of a clear gender agenda in the Uruguayan case. These other variables include levels of gender awareness among female deputies and inter-party networking around a gender legislative agenda.Editora Mundos Sociais2006-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292006000300007Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas n.52 2006reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292006000300007Archenti,NélidaJohnson,Nikiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:10:40Zoai:scielo:S0873-65292006000300007Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:22:06.857223Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
title Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
spellingShingle Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
Archenti,Nélida
political representation
gender
quotas
Latin America
title_short Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
title_full Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
title_fullStr Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
title_full_unstemmed Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
title_sort Engendering the legislative agenda with and without the quota: A comparative study of Argentina and Uruguay
author Archenti,Nélida
author_facet Archenti,Nélida
Johnson,Niki
author_role author
author2 Johnson,Niki
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Archenti,Nélida
Johnson,Niki
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv political representation
gender
quotas
Latin America
topic political representation
gender
quotas
Latin America
description This article sets out to explore the effects of the quota law by comparing the composition by sex of the legislatures and the legislative activity of women MPs in Argentina and Uruguay since 1993 to 2003 (first ten years with quotas in Argentina). In 1991 Argentina became the first country in the world to establish by law a quota system that guarantees women’s access to parliament. This institutional reform produced an important impact on many countries of Latin America which sanctioned similar laws. In contrast, in 2003 Uruguay failed to pass the third bill presented since 1988 proposing the introduction of a similar quota system, and remains one of the few countries in the Region that has not introduced a quota law. At the present, Argentine women deputies comprise over a third of members of the Chamber of Representatives, while just 11 per cent of members of the Uruguayan Chamber of Deputies are women. The main objective of this paper is to undertake a comparative study of the Argentinean and Uruguayan cases based on an analysis of women MPs’ parliamentary activity, focusing on the bills they present, in order to identify effects of quotas on the design of parliamentary gender agenda. The central hypothesis is that quotas have an outstanding influence engendering legislative agenda however other relevant factors must be taken into account in order to understand the whole process. These would contribute to the comprehension of the presence of a clear gender agenda in the Uruguayan case. These other variables include levels of gender awareness among female deputies and inter-party networking around a gender legislative agenda.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292006000300007
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292006000300007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0873-65292006000300007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mundos Sociais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora Mundos Sociais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas n.52 2006
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137305269633024