CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sobral, Sónia Rolland
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3579
Resumo: The difficulties of many students in introductory programming courses and the consequent failure and drop out make it necessary to look for motivation strategies for them to be successful. One of the strategies that is touted in the literature is self-assessment to compromise and motivate students. As we had doubts about the possibility of this strategy, we did an experiment and asked the students to predict the grades of the two tests and the two projects during a semester. Even knowing the correction grid and exercises that involve programming languages, which shows the result to the programmer, we found that the students' forecasts were not very accurate. In the first test we found that the worst students said they were going to get reasonable grades and much better than reality, while the best students thought they had worse grades than they actually had. The other moments of evaluation did not have as severe results, but forecasts continued to be inaccurate. We did tests by gender, by age, for being a freshman or not, for having taken a computer course in high school and for previous knowledge of programming languages: none of these variables proved to be as significant as the students' grades and their corresponding insecurity-fear or optimism-unconscious.
id RCAP_410eaa95fad7eb7bc2236234c3f41172
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uportu.pt:11328/3579
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?CS1Grade predictIntroduction to programmingMotivation strategiesThe difficulties of many students in introductory programming courses and the consequent failure and drop out make it necessary to look for motivation strategies for them to be successful. One of the strategies that is touted in the literature is self-assessment to compromise and motivate students. As we had doubts about the possibility of this strategy, we did an experiment and asked the students to predict the grades of the two tests and the two projects during a semester. Even knowing the correction grid and exercises that involve programming languages, which shows the result to the programmer, we found that the students' forecasts were not very accurate. In the first test we found that the worst students said they were going to get reasonable grades and much better than reality, while the best students thought they had worse grades than they actually had. The other moments of evaluation did not have as severe results, but forecasts continued to be inaccurate. We did tests by gender, by age, for being a freshman or not, for having taken a computer course in high school and for previous knowledge of programming languages: none of these variables proved to be as significant as the students' grades and their corresponding insecurity-fear or optimism-unconscious.IJIET2021-07-06T14:32:51Z2021-01-01T00:00:00Z2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/3579eng2010-3689 (Electronic)10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.8.1539Sobral, Sónia Rollandinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-06-15T02:12:04ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
title CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
spellingShingle CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
Sobral, Sónia Rolland
CS1
Grade predict
Introduction to programming
Motivation strategies
title_short CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
title_full CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
title_fullStr CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
title_full_unstemmed CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
title_sort CS1 Student Grade Prediction: Unconscious Optimism vs Insecurity?
author Sobral, Sónia Rolland
author_facet Sobral, Sónia Rolland
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sobral, Sónia Rolland
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CS1
Grade predict
Introduction to programming
Motivation strategies
topic CS1
Grade predict
Introduction to programming
Motivation strategies
description The difficulties of many students in introductory programming courses and the consequent failure and drop out make it necessary to look for motivation strategies for them to be successful. One of the strategies that is touted in the literature is self-assessment to compromise and motivate students. As we had doubts about the possibility of this strategy, we did an experiment and asked the students to predict the grades of the two tests and the two projects during a semester. Even knowing the correction grid and exercises that involve programming languages, which shows the result to the programmer, we found that the students' forecasts were not very accurate. In the first test we found that the worst students said they were going to get reasonable grades and much better than reality, while the best students thought they had worse grades than they actually had. The other moments of evaluation did not have as severe results, but forecasts continued to be inaccurate. We did tests by gender, by age, for being a freshman or not, for having taken a computer course in high school and for previous knowledge of programming languages: none of these variables proved to be as significant as the students' grades and their corresponding insecurity-fear or optimism-unconscious.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-06T14:32:51Z
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3579
url http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3579
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2010-3689 (Electronic)
10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.8.1539
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IJIET
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IJIET
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777302555489992704