Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cerca, Nuno
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Pier, Gerald B., Oliveira, Rosário, Azeredo, Joana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1830
Resumo: The main goal of this work was to evaluate the adhesion to acrylic of several clinical strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus using both static and dynamic adhesion methods, and to compare the results obtained with these two methods. Adhesion was evaluated using the static slide method with different washing procedures, and the parallel plate flow chamber method. The extent of S. epidermidis adhesion, assessed by both methods, was greater than that of S. haemolyticus. The number of bacteria which adhered using the static method was lower than that using the dynamic method. It was found that the simple static method, when performed with an accurate washing procedure, can be as effective as the dynamic flow method for assessing differences in the adherence capacity of strains. Although the dynamic flow method yielded more overall information, its greater complexity and cost may not always justify its use for certain experimental comparisons. This investigation has shown that simple static adhesion methods, when performed accurately, can be used to evaluate differences in adhesion capacity.
id RCAP_4199f6d9306e9f669ab35dd8158d4cb2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/1830
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic methodAdhesionParallel flow plateSlide static methodStaphylococcus epidermidisStaphylococcus haemolyticusScience & TechnologyThe main goal of this work was to evaluate the adhesion to acrylic of several clinical strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus using both static and dynamic adhesion methods, and to compare the results obtained with these two methods. Adhesion was evaluated using the static slide method with different washing procedures, and the parallel plate flow chamber method. The extent of S. epidermidis adhesion, assessed by both methods, was greater than that of S. haemolyticus. The number of bacteria which adhered using the static method was lower than that using the dynamic method. It was found that the simple static method, when performed with an accurate washing procedure, can be as effective as the dynamic flow method for assessing differences in the adherence capacity of strains. Although the dynamic flow method yielded more overall information, its greater complexity and cost may not always justify its use for certain experimental comparisons. This investigation has shown that simple static adhesion methods, when performed accurately, can be used to evaluate differences in adhesion capacity.NIH - grant AI 46706.Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) – Programa Operacional “Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovação” (POCTI) - POCTI/ESP/42688/2001, grant SFRH/BD/8676/2002.ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoCerca, NunoPier, Gerald B.Oliveira, RosárioAzeredo, Joana20042004-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/1830eng"Research in microbiology". ISSN 0923-2508. 155:9 (2004) 755-760.0923-250810.1016/j.resmic.2004.06.00515501653info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:54:04Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/1830Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:53:35.955632Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
title Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
Cerca, Nuno
Adhesion
Parallel flow plate
Slide static method
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Science & Technology
title_short Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
title_full Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
title_sort Comparative evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) adherence to acrylic by a static method and a parallel-plate flow dynamic method
author Cerca, Nuno
author_facet Cerca, Nuno
Pier, Gerald B.
Oliveira, Rosário
Azeredo, Joana
author_role author
author2 Pier, Gerald B.
Oliveira, Rosário
Azeredo, Joana
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cerca, Nuno
Pier, Gerald B.
Oliveira, Rosário
Azeredo, Joana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Adhesion
Parallel flow plate
Slide static method
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Science & Technology
topic Adhesion
Parallel flow plate
Slide static method
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
Science & Technology
description The main goal of this work was to evaluate the adhesion to acrylic of several clinical strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus using both static and dynamic adhesion methods, and to compare the results obtained with these two methods. Adhesion was evaluated using the static slide method with different washing procedures, and the parallel plate flow chamber method. The extent of S. epidermidis adhesion, assessed by both methods, was greater than that of S. haemolyticus. The number of bacteria which adhered using the static method was lower than that using the dynamic method. It was found that the simple static method, when performed with an accurate washing procedure, can be as effective as the dynamic flow method for assessing differences in the adherence capacity of strains. Although the dynamic flow method yielded more overall information, its greater complexity and cost may not always justify its use for certain experimental comparisons. This investigation has shown that simple static adhesion methods, when performed accurately, can be used to evaluate differences in adhesion capacity.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1830
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1830
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Research in microbiology". ISSN 0923-2508. 155:9 (2004) 755-760.
0923-2508
10.1016/j.resmic.2004.06.005
15501653
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133132731973632