Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2015 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12980 |
Summary: | The performance appraisal has a very important role in the strategic objectives of the organization, because it contributes to its efficacy (Aguinis, 2007). However, some limitations of top-down performance appraisal like the subjectivity have been proposed other evaluations, like 360-degree evaluation (Kondrasuk, 2012). This is a specific evaluation that considers more than one appraiser (Brutus & Gorriti, 2005). The purpose of this research is to know if the application of 360-degree evaluation influences organizational communication. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study through the interviews with experts. The results that will be presented are still preliminary and have theoretical and practical applications. In general, we conclude that 360-degree evaluation could be advantageous for organizational communication (e.g. active voice of employees; symmetrical and bi-directional communication). |
id |
RCAP_41f19af5ba6bb7130b3c7c4a8b6eff50 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12980 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts?Performance Appraisal360-degree evaluationOrganizational CommunicationThe performance appraisal has a very important role in the strategic objectives of the organization, because it contributes to its efficacy (Aguinis, 2007). However, some limitations of top-down performance appraisal like the subjectivity have been proposed other evaluations, like 360-degree evaluation (Kondrasuk, 2012). This is a specific evaluation that considers more than one appraiser (Brutus & Gorriti, 2005). The purpose of this research is to know if the application of 360-degree evaluation influences organizational communication. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study through the interviews with experts. The results that will be presented are still preliminary and have theoretical and practical applications. In general, we conclude that 360-degree evaluation could be advantageous for organizational communication (e.g. active voice of employees; symmetrical and bi-directional communication).Associação Portuguesa de Profissionais em Sociologia Industrial, das Organizações e do Trabalho2017-04-18T09:50:36Z2015-01-01T00:00:00Z20152019-05-17T10:00:57Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/12980eng0871-4835Mourão, R. A.Miranda, S.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T18:00:54Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12980Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:32:22.057363Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
title |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
spellingShingle |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? Mourão, R. A. Performance Appraisal 360-degree evaluation Organizational Communication |
title_short |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
title_full |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
title_fullStr |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
title_sort |
Communication in organizations and 360-degree evaluation: what is the relationship between the two concepts? |
author |
Mourão, R. A. |
author_facet |
Mourão, R. A. Miranda, S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miranda, S. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mourão, R. A. Miranda, S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Performance Appraisal 360-degree evaluation Organizational Communication |
topic |
Performance Appraisal 360-degree evaluation Organizational Communication |
description |
The performance appraisal has a very important role in the strategic objectives of the organization, because it contributes to its efficacy (Aguinis, 2007). However, some limitations of top-down performance appraisal like the subjectivity have been proposed other evaluations, like 360-degree evaluation (Kondrasuk, 2012). This is a specific evaluation that considers more than one appraiser (Brutus & Gorriti, 2005). The purpose of this research is to know if the application of 360-degree evaluation influences organizational communication. We conducted a qualitative exploratory study through the interviews with experts. The results that will be presented are still preliminary and have theoretical and practical applications. In general, we conclude that 360-degree evaluation could be advantageous for organizational communication (e.g. active voice of employees; symmetrical and bi-directional communication). |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z 2015 2017-04-18T09:50:36Z 2019-05-17T10:00:57Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12980 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12980 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
0871-4835 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Profissionais em Sociologia Industrial, das Organizações e do Trabalho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Profissionais em Sociologia Industrial, das Organizações e do Trabalho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134885078630400 |