Brain teasers: putting up a fight

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Cláudia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/18104
Resumo: Our underlying question echoes the concern of many teachers: how can we motivate today’s students in our increasingly technological era? Considering that the current educational system dates back to the Industrial Revolution, it is wholly unfit to grapple with students’ interests and engagements. There are scholars who liken the educational organisation to an assembly line, according to which pupils are grouped in a class by “date of manufacture”, disregarding all personal traits and constraints that necessarily distinguish all students from Basic Education to Higher Education. Despite growing discussions and numerous attempts to change systems throughout the world, we are still obsessed with the use of coursebooks, with standardising testing, with the distinction between bright/ academic/ high-mark and non-bright/ non-academic/ low-mark students and with a number of unfathomable dichotomies. We seek to discuss a number of inconsistencies we perceive in the Portuguese education system and how they may hamper an up-to-date educational approach and prevent the dethroning of the prevailing mainstream education paradigm. The current Finnish system, considered to be among the best in the world, may serve as the role model, stressing out that standardisation does not equal quality no more than frenetic evaluation equals acquisition of knowledge and lifelong skills. Critical thinking may entail the answer and enable us as teachers to tease students’ brains, as well as ours, bringing in a sense of purpose and the bigger picture to have a saying in the game. But will a selection of classroom strategies and activities that bring about critical thinking suffice if we are confronted with a blind administrative and bureaucratic monster? Can teachers and students alike put up a fight? Can our brains be teased into forward motion?
id RCAP_428fd34f6bbdbf9d71e8eea128d6b5a7
oai_identifier_str oai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/18104
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Brain teasers: putting up a fightTraditional educationModern schoolCritical thinkingOur underlying question echoes the concern of many teachers: how can we motivate today’s students in our increasingly technological era? Considering that the current educational system dates back to the Industrial Revolution, it is wholly unfit to grapple with students’ interests and engagements. There are scholars who liken the educational organisation to an assembly line, according to which pupils are grouped in a class by “date of manufacture”, disregarding all personal traits and constraints that necessarily distinguish all students from Basic Education to Higher Education. Despite growing discussions and numerous attempts to change systems throughout the world, we are still obsessed with the use of coursebooks, with standardising testing, with the distinction between bright/ academic/ high-mark and non-bright/ non-academic/ low-mark students and with a number of unfathomable dichotomies. We seek to discuss a number of inconsistencies we perceive in the Portuguese education system and how they may hamper an up-to-date educational approach and prevent the dethroning of the prevailing mainstream education paradigm. The current Finnish system, considered to be among the best in the world, may serve as the role model, stressing out that standardisation does not equal quality no more than frenetic evaluation equals acquisition of knowledge and lifelong skills. Critical thinking may entail the answer and enable us as teachers to tease students’ brains, as well as ours, bringing in a sense of purpose and the bigger picture to have a saying in the game. But will a selection of classroom strategies and activities that bring about critical thinking suffice if we are confronted with a blind administrative and bureaucratic monster? Can teachers and students alike put up a fight? Can our brains be teased into forward motion?Instituto Politécnico de BragançaBiblioteca Digital do IPBMartins, Cláudia2018-10-23T09:11:38Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10198/18104engMartins, Cláudia Susana Nunes (2017). Brain teasers: putting up a fight. In II Encontro Internacional de Formação na Docência (INCTE): Livro de atas. Bragança: Instituto Politécnico de Bragança. p. 87-94. ISSN 978-972-745-222-4978-972-745-222-4info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-21T10:41:25Zoai:bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt:10198/18104Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T23:08:08.910947Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brain teasers: putting up a fight
title Brain teasers: putting up a fight
spellingShingle Brain teasers: putting up a fight
Martins, Cláudia
Traditional education
Modern school
Critical thinking
title_short Brain teasers: putting up a fight
title_full Brain teasers: putting up a fight
title_fullStr Brain teasers: putting up a fight
title_full_unstemmed Brain teasers: putting up a fight
title_sort Brain teasers: putting up a fight
author Martins, Cláudia
author_facet Martins, Cláudia
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital do IPB
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Cláudia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Traditional education
Modern school
Critical thinking
topic Traditional education
Modern school
Critical thinking
description Our underlying question echoes the concern of many teachers: how can we motivate today’s students in our increasingly technological era? Considering that the current educational system dates back to the Industrial Revolution, it is wholly unfit to grapple with students’ interests and engagements. There are scholars who liken the educational organisation to an assembly line, according to which pupils are grouped in a class by “date of manufacture”, disregarding all personal traits and constraints that necessarily distinguish all students from Basic Education to Higher Education. Despite growing discussions and numerous attempts to change systems throughout the world, we are still obsessed with the use of coursebooks, with standardising testing, with the distinction between bright/ academic/ high-mark and non-bright/ non-academic/ low-mark students and with a number of unfathomable dichotomies. We seek to discuss a number of inconsistencies we perceive in the Portuguese education system and how they may hamper an up-to-date educational approach and prevent the dethroning of the prevailing mainstream education paradigm. The current Finnish system, considered to be among the best in the world, may serve as the role model, stressing out that standardisation does not equal quality no more than frenetic evaluation equals acquisition of knowledge and lifelong skills. Critical thinking may entail the answer and enable us as teachers to tease students’ brains, as well as ours, bringing in a sense of purpose and the bigger picture to have a saying in the game. But will a selection of classroom strategies and activities that bring about critical thinking suffice if we are confronted with a blind administrative and bureaucratic monster? Can teachers and students alike put up a fight? Can our brains be teased into forward motion?
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2018-10-23T09:11:38Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10198/18104
url http://hdl.handle.net/10198/18104
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Martins, Cláudia Susana Nunes (2017). Brain teasers: putting up a fight. In II Encontro Internacional de Formação na Docência (INCTE): Livro de atas. Bragança: Instituto Politécnico de Bragança. p. 87-94. ISSN 978-972-745-222-4
978-972-745-222-4
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Politécnico de Bragança
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799135339344822272