Sepsis Mortality Prediction Based on Predisposition, Infection and Response

• Autor(a) principal: Moreno, R
• Data de Publicação: 2008
• Outros Autores: Metnitz, B, Adler, L, Hoechtl, A, Bauer, P, Metnitz, P, SAPS 3 Investigators
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/1428
• topic: Doença Crónica; Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas; Infecção Hospitalar; Mortalidade; Bases de Dados Factuais; Susceptibilidade a Doença; Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas; Mortalidade Hospitalar; Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos; Sépsis; Índice de Gravidade da Doença; Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos; Choque Séptico; Microbiologia; Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistémica

OBJECTIVE: To empirically test, based on a large multicenter, multinational database, whether a modified PIRO (predisposition, insult, response, and organ dysfunction) concept could be applied to predict mortality in patients with infection and sepsis. DESIGN: Substudy of a multicenter multinational cohort study (SAPS 3). PATIENTS: A total of 2,628 patients with signs of infection or sepsis who stayed in the ICU for >48 h. Three boxes of variables were defined, according to the PIRO concept. Box 1 (Predisposition) contained information about the patient's condition before ICU admission. Box 2 (Injury) contained information about the infection at ICU admission. Box 3 (Response) was defined as the response to the infection, expressed as a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score after 48 h. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Most of the infections were community acquired (59.6%); 32.5% were hospital acquired. The median age of the patients was 65 (50-75) years, and 41.1% were female. About 22% (n=576) of the patients presented with infection only, 36.3% (n=953) with signs of sepsis, 23.6% (n=619) with severe sepsis, and 18.3% (n=480) with septic shock. Hospital mortality was 40.6% overall, greater in those with septic shock (52.5%) than in those with infection (34.7%). Several factors related to predisposition, infection and response were associated with hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: The proposed three-level system, by using objectively defined criteria for risk of mortality in sepsis, could be used by physicians to stratify patients at ICU admission or shortly thereafter, contributing to a better selection of management according to the risk of death.