Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170 |
Resumo: | Resource consumption and related waste production are still rapidly increasing all over the world, leading to social and environmental challenges and to the production of the so-called ‘wastescapes’. Peri-urban areas—in-between urban and rural territories—are particularly vulnerable and prone to develop into wastescapes because they are generally characterised by mixed functions and/or monofunctional settlements, as well as by fragmentation in a low-density territory that is often crossed by large infrastructure networks. Moreover, peri-urban areas are generally the selected locations for the development of plants for waste management. In this way, they are crossed by waste flows of a different nature, in a landscape of operational infrastructures and wasted landscapes. Implementing Circular Economy (CE) principles, interpreting waste and wastescapes as resources, is a way to significantly reduce raw material and (soil) resource consumption, improving cities’ metabolism. A circular approach can positively affect the spatial, social and environmental performances of peri-urban areas. However, the transition towards a CE presents many challenges. This article outlines an approach to address these challenges, presenting a co-creation process among researchers, experts and stakeholders within Living Labs (LLs) processes. LLs are physical and virtual spaces, aiming at the co-creation of site-specific eco-innovative solutions (EIS) and strategies. In the LLs, public–private–people partnerships are developed by applying an iterative methodology consisting of five phases: Co-Exploring, Co-Design, Co-Production, Co-Decision, and Co-Governance. This article presents a case study approach, analysing the co-creation methodology applied in two peri-urban living labs, located in the Metropolitan Areas of Naples (Italy) and Amsterdam (The Netherlands), within REPAiR Horizon2020 research project. |
id |
RCAP_431d7ef40292ad60b767e5082d4b2db5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2170 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approachcircular economy; circular metabolism; circular waste management; co-creation; co-governance; living labs; peri-urban living labs; resource scarcity; waste management; wastescapesResource consumption and related waste production are still rapidly increasing all over the world, leading to social and environmental challenges and to the production of the so-called ‘wastescapes’. Peri-urban areas—in-between urban and rural territories—are particularly vulnerable and prone to develop into wastescapes because they are generally characterised by mixed functions and/or monofunctional settlements, as well as by fragmentation in a low-density territory that is often crossed by large infrastructure networks. Moreover, peri-urban areas are generally the selected locations for the development of plants for waste management. In this way, they are crossed by waste flows of a different nature, in a landscape of operational infrastructures and wasted landscapes. Implementing Circular Economy (CE) principles, interpreting waste and wastescapes as resources, is a way to significantly reduce raw material and (soil) resource consumption, improving cities’ metabolism. A circular approach can positively affect the spatial, social and environmental performances of peri-urban areas. However, the transition towards a CE presents many challenges. This article outlines an approach to address these challenges, presenting a co-creation process among researchers, experts and stakeholders within Living Labs (LLs) processes. LLs are physical and virtual spaces, aiming at the co-creation of site-specific eco-innovative solutions (EIS) and strategies. In the LLs, public–private–people partnerships are developed by applying an iterative methodology consisting of five phases: Co-Exploring, Co-Design, Co-Production, Co-Decision, and Co-Governance. This article presents a case study approach, analysing the co-creation methodology applied in two peri-urban living labs, located in the Metropolitan Areas of Naples (Italy) and Amsterdam (The Netherlands), within REPAiR Horizon2020 research project.Cogitatio2019-09-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2170Urban Planning; Vol 4, No 3 (2019): Facilitating Circular Economy in Urban Planning; 5-182183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2170https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2170/2170Copyright (c) 2019 Libera Amenta, Anna Attademo, Hilde Remøy, Gilda Berruti, Maria Cerreta, Enrico Formato, Maria Federica Palestino, Michelangelo Russohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmenta, LiberaAttademo, AnnaRemøy, HildeBerruti, GildaCerreta, MariaFormato, EnricoPalestino, Maria FedericaRusso, Michelangelo2022-12-20T11:00:15Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2170Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:08.003623Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
title |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
spellingShingle |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach Amenta, Libera circular economy; circular metabolism; circular waste management; co-creation; co-governance; living labs; peri-urban living labs; resource scarcity; waste management; wastescapes |
title_short |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
title_full |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
title_fullStr |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
title_sort |
Managing the Transition towards Circular Metabolism: Living Labs as a Co-Creation Approach |
author |
Amenta, Libera |
author_facet |
Amenta, Libera Attademo, Anna Remøy, Hilde Berruti, Gilda Cerreta, Maria Formato, Enrico Palestino, Maria Federica Russo, Michelangelo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Attademo, Anna Remøy, Hilde Berruti, Gilda Cerreta, Maria Formato, Enrico Palestino, Maria Federica Russo, Michelangelo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Amenta, Libera Attademo, Anna Remøy, Hilde Berruti, Gilda Cerreta, Maria Formato, Enrico Palestino, Maria Federica Russo, Michelangelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
circular economy; circular metabolism; circular waste management; co-creation; co-governance; living labs; peri-urban living labs; resource scarcity; waste management; wastescapes |
topic |
circular economy; circular metabolism; circular waste management; co-creation; co-governance; living labs; peri-urban living labs; resource scarcity; waste management; wastescapes |
description |
Resource consumption and related waste production are still rapidly increasing all over the world, leading to social and environmental challenges and to the production of the so-called ‘wastescapes’. Peri-urban areas—in-between urban and rural territories—are particularly vulnerable and prone to develop into wastescapes because they are generally characterised by mixed functions and/or monofunctional settlements, as well as by fragmentation in a low-density territory that is often crossed by large infrastructure networks. Moreover, peri-urban areas are generally the selected locations for the development of plants for waste management. In this way, they are crossed by waste flows of a different nature, in a landscape of operational infrastructures and wasted landscapes. Implementing Circular Economy (CE) principles, interpreting waste and wastescapes as resources, is a way to significantly reduce raw material and (soil) resource consumption, improving cities’ metabolism. A circular approach can positively affect the spatial, social and environmental performances of peri-urban areas. However, the transition towards a CE presents many challenges. This article outlines an approach to address these challenges, presenting a co-creation process among researchers, experts and stakeholders within Living Labs (LLs) processes. LLs are physical and virtual spaces, aiming at the co-creation of site-specific eco-innovative solutions (EIS) and strategies. In the LLs, public–private–people partnerships are developed by applying an iterative methodology consisting of five phases: Co-Exploring, Co-Design, Co-Production, Co-Decision, and Co-Governance. This article presents a case study approach, analysing the co-creation methodology applied in two peri-urban living labs, located in the Metropolitan Areas of Naples (Italy) and Amsterdam (The Netherlands), within REPAiR Horizon2020 research project. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2170 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2170 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2170 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i3.2170 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/2170/2170 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Urban Planning; Vol 4, No 3 (2019): Facilitating Circular Economy in Urban Planning; 5-18 2183-7635 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130667340005376 |