Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10252 |
Resumo: | Urinalysis is a diagnostic screening test that can diagnose and monitor genitourinary, kidney and metabolic diseases even before the onset of clinical signs. Although it is an extremely useful, non-invasive, readily available and inexpensive tool it is a much-neglected test in veterinary medicine because it’s ponderous, time-consuming, imprecise and has wide variability. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interchangeable capacity of the counting cell chamber Pentasquare slide in comparison with the traditional method of urine sediment using slide and coverslip. This study included 34 patients, 17 dogs and 17 cats, that were admitted in the veterinary hospital of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (HV-UTAD) between May 2nd and July 31st of 2019. The population under study had urinalysis performed whether because a genitourinary or kidney disease was suspected or to evaluate the evolution of a previous diagnosed pathology. To every patient a type II urinalysis was performed (dipsticks and urine sediment). In all cases sediment evaluation was made with 3 preparations: one traditional method for urine sediment preparation and two preparations on the counting cell chambers in study. The statistical analysis of method comparison by using Passing-Bablock regression and Bland Altman plot demonstrated that the counting cell chambers can be used interchangeably with the slide and coverslip method. For qualitative parameters the sensitivity and specificity revealed high values, between 43% to 84% and 89% to 100% respectively. The agreement rate between methods was moderate to substantial (values from 0,47 to 0,77), assessed by the calculated Cohen’s Kappa value. Besides these values that assess the capacity of the counting cell chamber to replace the traditional method, reproducibility and repeatability were also calculated. Repeatability revealed high values of correlation between observers, being the lowest value obtained of 68% and the highest of 100%. As for reproducibility the counting cell chambers revealed correlation values of 61% to 100% for different elements, except for calcium oxalate crystals. Even though more studies are needed to evaluate the use of the Pentasquare slide as reference method for urine sediment in veterinary medicine this preliminary study verifies that counting cell chambers can be used for urine sediment evaluation in dogs and cats. |
id |
RCAP_435212ef62639c26e81b68cdd3a7638f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/10252 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary studyurinalysissedimentUrinalysis is a diagnostic screening test that can diagnose and monitor genitourinary, kidney and metabolic diseases even before the onset of clinical signs. Although it is an extremely useful, non-invasive, readily available and inexpensive tool it is a much-neglected test in veterinary medicine because it’s ponderous, time-consuming, imprecise and has wide variability. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interchangeable capacity of the counting cell chamber Pentasquare slide in comparison with the traditional method of urine sediment using slide and coverslip. This study included 34 patients, 17 dogs and 17 cats, that were admitted in the veterinary hospital of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (HV-UTAD) between May 2nd and July 31st of 2019. The population under study had urinalysis performed whether because a genitourinary or kidney disease was suspected or to evaluate the evolution of a previous diagnosed pathology. To every patient a type II urinalysis was performed (dipsticks and urine sediment). In all cases sediment evaluation was made with 3 preparations: one traditional method for urine sediment preparation and two preparations on the counting cell chambers in study. The statistical analysis of method comparison by using Passing-Bablock regression and Bland Altman plot demonstrated that the counting cell chambers can be used interchangeably with the slide and coverslip method. For qualitative parameters the sensitivity and specificity revealed high values, between 43% to 84% and 89% to 100% respectively. The agreement rate between methods was moderate to substantial (values from 0,47 to 0,77), assessed by the calculated Cohen’s Kappa value. Besides these values that assess the capacity of the counting cell chamber to replace the traditional method, reproducibility and repeatability were also calculated. Repeatability revealed high values of correlation between observers, being the lowest value obtained of 68% and the highest of 100%. As for reproducibility the counting cell chambers revealed correlation values of 61% to 100% for different elements, except for calcium oxalate crystals. Even though more studies are needed to evaluate the use of the Pentasquare slide as reference method for urine sediment in veterinary medicine this preliminary study verifies that counting cell chambers can be used for urine sediment evaluation in dogs and cats.Urinalysis is a diagnostic screening test that can diagnose and monitor genitourinary, k A análise de urina é um exame complementar de diagnóstico capaz de diagnosticar e monitorizar patologias do sistema geniturinário, de origem renal ou metabólica, mesmo antes do aparecimento de sinais clínicos. Mesmo sendo um exame extremamente útil, não-invasivo, de disponibilidade imediata e pouco dispendioso é largamente negligenciado em medicina veterinária por ser considerado trabalhoso, demorado, impreciso e com grande variabilidade de resultados. Este estudo avalia a precisão diagnóstica e capacidade de permutação da câmara de contagem de células – pentasquare – em comparação ao método tradicional de sedimento urinário usando a lâmina e lamela. Este estudo incluiu 34 pacientes, 17 cães e 17 gatos, que foram admitidos no Hospital Veterinário da Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (HV-UTAD) entre maio e julho de 2019. O exame de urina foi realizado à população em estudo por suspeita de patologias renais ou geniturinárias ou como teste de controlo de resposta a tratamento. Em todos os animais foi realizada uma análise de urina tipo II (tira reativa e sedimento urinário). Em todos os casos o sedimento foi avaliado em três preparações: uma preparação no método tradicional para sedimento urinário e duas preparações nas câmaras de contagem de células em estudo. A análise estatística de comparação de métodos realizada utilizando a regressão de Passing-Bablock e o gráfico de Bland Altman demonstrou que as câmaras de contagem de células podem ser permutadas pelo método tradicional de lâmina e lamela. Para os parâmetros qualitativos a sensibilidade e a especificidade revelaram valores altos, entre os 43% e a 84% e os 89% a 100% respetivamente. A taxa de concordância entre métodos, estimada pelo valor de Cohen’s Kappa, foi de moderada a substancial, sendo o menor valor obtido de 0,47 e o maior de 0,77. Além dos valores calculados que estimam a capacidade de a câmara de células poder substituir o método tradicional, também os valores de reprodutibilidade e repetibilidade foram calculados. A repetibilidade revelou valores de correlação entre observadores elevados, de 68% a 100% para os diferentes elementos. A reprodutibilidade mostrou valores de correlação entre 61% a 100% para os diferentes elementos, com a exceção dos valores obtidos para o parâmetrodos cristais de oxalato de cálcio. Ainda que mais estudos sejam necessários para avaliar o uso da câmara pentasquare como método de referência na avaliação do sedimento urinário em medicina veterinária, este estudo preliminar verifica que estas câmaras podem ser utilizadas para a análise de sedimento urinário em cães e gatos.2020-11-11T11:28:50Z2020-02-05T00:00:00Z2020-02-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10348/10252engParra, Wendy Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-02T12:54:37Zoai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/10252Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:05:59.192773Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
title |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
spellingShingle |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study Parra, Wendy Silva urinalysis sediment |
title_short |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
title_full |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
title_fullStr |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
title_sort |
Validation of fast-read microscopic slide on urine sediment examination of dogs and cats – a preliminary study |
author |
Parra, Wendy Silva |
author_facet |
Parra, Wendy Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Parra, Wendy Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
urinalysis sediment |
topic |
urinalysis sediment |
description |
Urinalysis is a diagnostic screening test that can diagnose and monitor genitourinary, kidney and metabolic diseases even before the onset of clinical signs. Although it is an extremely useful, non-invasive, readily available and inexpensive tool it is a much-neglected test in veterinary medicine because it’s ponderous, time-consuming, imprecise and has wide variability. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interchangeable capacity of the counting cell chamber Pentasquare slide in comparison with the traditional method of urine sediment using slide and coverslip. This study included 34 patients, 17 dogs and 17 cats, that were admitted in the veterinary hospital of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (HV-UTAD) between May 2nd and July 31st of 2019. The population under study had urinalysis performed whether because a genitourinary or kidney disease was suspected or to evaluate the evolution of a previous diagnosed pathology. To every patient a type II urinalysis was performed (dipsticks and urine sediment). In all cases sediment evaluation was made with 3 preparations: one traditional method for urine sediment preparation and two preparations on the counting cell chambers in study. The statistical analysis of method comparison by using Passing-Bablock regression and Bland Altman plot demonstrated that the counting cell chambers can be used interchangeably with the slide and coverslip method. For qualitative parameters the sensitivity and specificity revealed high values, between 43% to 84% and 89% to 100% respectively. The agreement rate between methods was moderate to substantial (values from 0,47 to 0,77), assessed by the calculated Cohen’s Kappa value. Besides these values that assess the capacity of the counting cell chamber to replace the traditional method, reproducibility and repeatability were also calculated. Repeatability revealed high values of correlation between observers, being the lowest value obtained of 68% and the highest of 100%. As for reproducibility the counting cell chambers revealed correlation values of 61% to 100% for different elements, except for calcium oxalate crystals. Even though more studies are needed to evaluate the use of the Pentasquare slide as reference method for urine sediment in veterinary medicine this preliminary study verifies that counting cell chambers can be used for urine sediment evaluation in dogs and cats. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-11T11:28:50Z 2020-02-05T00:00:00Z 2020-02-05 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10252 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10348/10252 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137147699068928 |