The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crowther, David
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Abreu, Rute, David, Fátima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10314/532
Resumo: Most corporations in the world are currently trying to distance themselves from the excesses and misbehaviours which have been manifest in recent years by those corporations which have been symbolised as rogue corporations. Many would consider that these corporations have however behaved no differently to most others and have merely been found out. Nevertheless the distancing of the rogues from the rest has led to a tremendous resurgence of interest in behaviour which has been classified as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). So, corporations are busy repackaging their behaviour as CSR and redesignating their spinmasters as Directors of CSR, for there is much evidence that little has changed in corporate behaviour except for this repackaging - the power of the semiotic being far more potent in the modem world that the power of actual action, and also obviating the need for such action. It is a central argument of this paper that CSR is a myth. So, the myth is founded on the arrogance of corporate managers, due to failures in Agency Theory; predicated in the ignorance of interpreters of corporate activity, dazzled by the power of the semiotic; and which legitimates corporate expropriation on an undiminished scale. This research will discuss the social contract between corporations and society; the perspective of stakeholder context; the dialectics of organisational performance; the Agency Theory and CSR; the measurement and evaluation of performance; and the accountability for performance. CSR involved a wide range of concepts, principals, methodologies and a large diversity of empirical analysis. The corporate excesses, which are starting to become disclosed and which are affecting large numbers of people, have raised an awareness of the social behaviours of corporations. This is one reason why the issue of corporate social responsibility has become a much more prominent feature of the corporate landscape. There are probably many reasons for the attention given to this phenomenon not least of which is the corporate excesses witnessed in recent years.
id RCAP_43ebb4678df92fb94dab2ece676f7491
oai_identifier_str oai:bdigital.ipg.pt:10314/532
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling The Myth of Corporate Social ResponsibilityAccountabilityResponsibilityCorporate Social ReportAgency TheoryMost corporations in the world are currently trying to distance themselves from the excesses and misbehaviours which have been manifest in recent years by those corporations which have been symbolised as rogue corporations. Many would consider that these corporations have however behaved no differently to most others and have merely been found out. Nevertheless the distancing of the rogues from the rest has led to a tremendous resurgence of interest in behaviour which has been classified as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). So, corporations are busy repackaging their behaviour as CSR and redesignating their spinmasters as Directors of CSR, for there is much evidence that little has changed in corporate behaviour except for this repackaging - the power of the semiotic being far more potent in the modem world that the power of actual action, and also obviating the need for such action. It is a central argument of this paper that CSR is a myth. So, the myth is founded on the arrogance of corporate managers, due to failures in Agency Theory; predicated in the ignorance of interpreters of corporate activity, dazzled by the power of the semiotic; and which legitimates corporate expropriation on an undiminished scale. This research will discuss the social contract between corporations and society; the perspective of stakeholder context; the dialectics of organisational performance; the Agency Theory and CSR; the measurement and evaluation of performance; and the accountability for performance. CSR involved a wide range of concepts, principals, methodologies and a large diversity of empirical analysis. The corporate excesses, which are starting to become disclosed and which are affecting large numbers of people, have raised an awareness of the social behaviours of corporations. This is one reason why the issue of corporate social responsibility has become a much more prominent feature of the corporate landscape. There are probably many reasons for the attention given to this phenomenon not least of which is the corporate excesses witnessed in recent years.Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão da Guarda, Portugal2011-05-16T10:35:40Z2011-05-162005-03-14T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10314/532http://hdl.handle.net/10314/532por1645-6920Crowther, DavidAbreu, RuteDavid, Fátimainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-30T02:55:36ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
title The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
spellingShingle The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
Crowther, David
Accountability
Responsibility
Corporate Social Report
Agency Theory
title_short The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
title_full The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
title_fullStr The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
title_full_unstemmed The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
title_sort The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility
author Crowther, David
author_facet Crowther, David
Abreu, Rute
David, Fátima
author_role author
author2 Abreu, Rute
David, Fátima
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crowther, David
Abreu, Rute
David, Fátima
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Accountability
Responsibility
Corporate Social Report
Agency Theory
topic Accountability
Responsibility
Corporate Social Report
Agency Theory
description Most corporations in the world are currently trying to distance themselves from the excesses and misbehaviours which have been manifest in recent years by those corporations which have been symbolised as rogue corporations. Many would consider that these corporations have however behaved no differently to most others and have merely been found out. Nevertheless the distancing of the rogues from the rest has led to a tremendous resurgence of interest in behaviour which has been classified as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). So, corporations are busy repackaging their behaviour as CSR and redesignating their spinmasters as Directors of CSR, for there is much evidence that little has changed in corporate behaviour except for this repackaging - the power of the semiotic being far more potent in the modem world that the power of actual action, and also obviating the need for such action. It is a central argument of this paper that CSR is a myth. So, the myth is founded on the arrogance of corporate managers, due to failures in Agency Theory; predicated in the ignorance of interpreters of corporate activity, dazzled by the power of the semiotic; and which legitimates corporate expropriation on an undiminished scale. This research will discuss the social contract between corporations and society; the perspective of stakeholder context; the dialectics of organisational performance; the Agency Theory and CSR; the measurement and evaluation of performance; and the accountability for performance. CSR involved a wide range of concepts, principals, methodologies and a large diversity of empirical analysis. The corporate excesses, which are starting to become disclosed and which are affecting large numbers of people, have raised an awareness of the social behaviours of corporations. This is one reason why the issue of corporate social responsibility has become a much more prominent feature of the corporate landscape. There are probably many reasons for the attention given to this phenomenon not least of which is the corporate excesses witnessed in recent years.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-03-14T00:00:00Z
2011-05-16T10:35:40Z
2011-05-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10314/532
http://hdl.handle.net/10314/532
url http://hdl.handle.net/10314/532
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1645-6920
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão da Guarda, Portugal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão da Guarda, Portugal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777304488955084800