Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34781 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_18 |
Resumo: | Multisensorial design usually relies on vision, audition and haptic senses for interacting with devices, generally leaving taste and smell aside from conventional modes used in most device interfaces. The feedback we get by interacting with appliances is mostly visual, auditive or haptic. We may agree that smell or taste may be secondary to the above referred senses due to several features, some related with cognition and others due to technical constraint. The role of taste and smell as a communicative feature from a device may not be obvious. However, these two senses may be of use. In taste we have the usage of Bitrex® as a safety feature being the most bitter substance in order to avoid ingestion of countless different products. Similarly, the intentional use of an unpleasant smell to prevent people from staying in a given space can be considered a good example of its usage. The use of scent as a secondary sense to help on experiences causing a prosody effect is also possible with smell. This paper will explore the role that a smell may have as a modality to be used in designing devices. |
id |
RCAP_455a0c02c63104fdfc38861c639b24c5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34781 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial designScentMultisensorialDesignOlfactoryModalityMultisensorial design usually relies on vision, audition and haptic senses for interacting with devices, generally leaving taste and smell aside from conventional modes used in most device interfaces. The feedback we get by interacting with appliances is mostly visual, auditive or haptic. We may agree that smell or taste may be secondary to the above referred senses due to several features, some related with cognition and others due to technical constraint. The role of taste and smell as a communicative feature from a device may not be obvious. However, these two senses may be of use. In taste we have the usage of Bitrex® as a safety feature being the most bitter substance in order to avoid ingestion of countless different products. Similarly, the intentional use of an unpleasant smell to prevent people from staying in a given space can be considered a good example of its usage. The use of scent as a secondary sense to help on experiences causing a prosody effect is also possible with smell. This paper will explore the role that a smell may have as a modality to be used in designing devices.Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon Scool of Architecture, CIAUD – Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and DesignSpringer Nature Switzerland2023-02-27T16:00:45Z2023-02-272020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/34781http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34781https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_18pormiguelbual@gmail.com742Bual, Miguelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:37:28Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34781Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:23:12.231956Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
title |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
spellingShingle |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design Bual, Miguel Scent Multisensorial Design Olfactory Modality |
title_short |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
title_full |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
title_fullStr |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
title_sort |
Scent as a modality – Study on the olfactory sense in multisensorial design |
author |
Bual, Miguel |
author_facet |
Bual, Miguel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bual, Miguel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Scent Multisensorial Design Olfactory Modality |
topic |
Scent Multisensorial Design Olfactory Modality |
description |
Multisensorial design usually relies on vision, audition and haptic senses for interacting with devices, generally leaving taste and smell aside from conventional modes used in most device interfaces. The feedback we get by interacting with appliances is mostly visual, auditive or haptic. We may agree that smell or taste may be secondary to the above referred senses due to several features, some related with cognition and others due to technical constraint. The role of taste and smell as a communicative feature from a device may not be obvious. However, these two senses may be of use. In taste we have the usage of Bitrex® as a safety feature being the most bitter substance in order to avoid ingestion of countless different products. Similarly, the intentional use of an unpleasant smell to prevent people from staying in a given space can be considered a good example of its usage. The use of scent as a secondary sense to help on experiences causing a prosody effect is also possible with smell. This paper will explore the role that a smell may have as a modality to be used in designing devices. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z 2023-02-27T16:00:45Z 2023-02-27 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34781 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34781 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_18 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34781 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_18 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
miguelbual@gmail.com 742 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature Switzerland |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer Nature Switzerland |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136714818584576 |