From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004 |
Resumo: | With the adoption of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) in 2003, the European Union (EU) for the first time introduced benchmarking procedures in the realm of democracy promotion, while also establishing the principles of 'positive conditionality' and differentiation. In order to exploit its full potential, however, this strategy must be able to define how political development can effectively be measured and monitored, along with the benchmarks chosen for this purpose. Applying insights of democratic and transition theories to the Action Plans concluded with Jordan and Tunisia, the contribution shows that the ENP suffers from the absence of analytical depth as far as concepts and processes of democratization are concerned, along with an arbitrary and largely useless selection of pseudo-benchmarks. While undermining the effectiveness of the leverage model of democratization policies, the EU's lack of clarity and determination seriously contradicts the declared objectives of its democracy promotion policy. |
id |
RCAP_45a4966d51c414bb652773909d54565d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/7004 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policyDemocracy promotionEU foreign policyJordanTunisiaEuropean neighbourhood policyWith the adoption of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) in 2003, the European Union (EU) for the first time introduced benchmarking procedures in the realm of democracy promotion, while also establishing the principles of 'positive conditionality' and differentiation. In order to exploit its full potential, however, this strategy must be able to define how political development can effectively be measured and monitored, along with the benchmarks chosen for this purpose. Applying insights of democratic and transition theories to the Action Plans concluded with Jordan and Tunisia, the contribution shows that the ENP suffers from the absence of analytical depth as far as concepts and processes of democratization are concerned, along with an arbitrary and largely useless selection of pseudo-benchmarks. While undermining the effectiveness of the leverage model of democratization policies, the EU's lack of clarity and determination seriously contradicts the declared objectives of its democracy promotion policy.Taylor & Francis/Routledge2014-04-29T09:29:54Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Z2011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004eng1351-0347Del Sarto, Raffaella A.Schumacher, Tobiasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:44:30Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/7004Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:21:08.113760Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
title |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
spellingShingle |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy Del Sarto, Raffaella A. Democracy promotion EU foreign policy Jordan Tunisia European neighbourhood policy |
title_short |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
title_full |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
title_fullStr |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
title_sort |
From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy |
author |
Del Sarto, Raffaella A. |
author_facet |
Del Sarto, Raffaella A. Schumacher, Tobias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schumacher, Tobias |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Del Sarto, Raffaella A. Schumacher, Tobias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Democracy promotion EU foreign policy Jordan Tunisia European neighbourhood policy |
topic |
Democracy promotion EU foreign policy Jordan Tunisia European neighbourhood policy |
description |
With the adoption of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) in 2003, the European Union (EU) for the first time introduced benchmarking procedures in the realm of democracy promotion, while also establishing the principles of 'positive conditionality' and differentiation. In order to exploit its full potential, however, this strategy must be able to define how political development can effectively be measured and monitored, along with the benchmarks chosen for this purpose. Applying insights of democratic and transition theories to the Action Plans concluded with Jordan and Tunisia, the contribution shows that the ENP suffers from the absence of analytical depth as far as concepts and processes of democratization are concerned, along with an arbitrary and largely useless selection of pseudo-benchmarks. While undermining the effectiveness of the leverage model of democratization policies, the EU's lack of clarity and determination seriously contradicts the declared objectives of its democracy promotion policy. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z 2011 2014-04-29T09:29:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
1351-0347 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis/Routledge |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis/Routledge |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134771869122560 |