From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Del Sarto, Raffaella A.
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Schumacher, Tobias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004
Resumo: With the adoption of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) in 2003, the European Union (EU) for the first time introduced benchmarking procedures in the realm of democracy promotion, while also establishing the principles of 'positive conditionality' and differentiation. In order to exploit its full potential, however, this strategy must be able to define how political development can effectively be measured and monitored, along with the benchmarks chosen for this purpose. Applying insights of democratic and transition theories to the Action Plans concluded with Jordan and Tunisia, the contribution shows that the ENP suffers from the absence of analytical depth as far as concepts and processes of democratization are concerned, along with an arbitrary and largely useless selection of pseudo-benchmarks. While undermining the effectiveness of the leverage model of democratization policies, the EU's lack of clarity and determination seriously contradicts the declared objectives of its democracy promotion policy.
id RCAP_45a4966d51c414bb652773909d54565d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/7004
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policyDemocracy promotionEU foreign policyJordanTunisiaEuropean neighbourhood policyWith the adoption of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) in 2003, the European Union (EU) for the first time introduced benchmarking procedures in the realm of democracy promotion, while also establishing the principles of 'positive conditionality' and differentiation. In order to exploit its full potential, however, this strategy must be able to define how political development can effectively be measured and monitored, along with the benchmarks chosen for this purpose. Applying insights of democratic and transition theories to the Action Plans concluded with Jordan and Tunisia, the contribution shows that the ENP suffers from the absence of analytical depth as far as concepts and processes of democratization are concerned, along with an arbitrary and largely useless selection of pseudo-benchmarks. While undermining the effectiveness of the leverage model of democratization policies, the EU's lack of clarity and determination seriously contradicts the declared objectives of its democracy promotion policy.Taylor & Francis/Routledge2014-04-29T09:29:54Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Z2011info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004eng1351-0347Del Sarto, Raffaella A.Schumacher, Tobiasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:44:30Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/7004Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:21:08.113760Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
title From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
spellingShingle From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
Del Sarto, Raffaella A.
Democracy promotion
EU foreign policy
Jordan
Tunisia
European neighbourhood policy
title_short From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
title_full From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
title_fullStr From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
title_full_unstemmed From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
title_sort From Brussels with love: leverage, benchmarking, and the action plans with Jordan and Tunisia in the EU's democratization policy
author Del Sarto, Raffaella A.
author_facet Del Sarto, Raffaella A.
Schumacher, Tobias
author_role author
author2 Schumacher, Tobias
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Del Sarto, Raffaella A.
Schumacher, Tobias
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy promotion
EU foreign policy
Jordan
Tunisia
European neighbourhood policy
topic Democracy promotion
EU foreign policy
Jordan
Tunisia
European neighbourhood policy
description With the adoption of the European neighbourhood policy (ENP) in 2003, the European Union (EU) for the first time introduced benchmarking procedures in the realm of democracy promotion, while also establishing the principles of 'positive conditionality' and differentiation. In order to exploit its full potential, however, this strategy must be able to define how political development can effectively be measured and monitored, along with the benchmarks chosen for this purpose. Applying insights of democratic and transition theories to the Action Plans concluded with Jordan and Tunisia, the contribution shows that the ENP suffers from the absence of analytical depth as far as concepts and processes of democratization are concerned, along with an arbitrary and largely useless selection of pseudo-benchmarks. While undermining the effectiveness of the leverage model of democratization policies, the EU's lack of clarity and determination seriously contradicts the declared objectives of its democracy promotion policy.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
2011
2014-04-29T09:29:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/7004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1351-0347
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis/Routledge
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis/Routledge
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134771869122560